Topic: Check Lauda's untrusted feedback, before you trust her. (Read 817 times)

How did you get this account? give us enough evidence to find that account seller.
Why did you merit OgNasty? he just told you to stop mentioning his name here, don't you know he is a competitor?
Did you send merits to OgNasty to later say that Lauda didn't remove your red tag because of that merit transaction?

Is it really necessary to quote that entire wall of text just to bump the thread?

Also, you shouldn't hijack other peoples threads to air your own grievances. Start (or update) your own thread... If you're trying to highlight evidence of similar issues, just link to the appropriate thread(s).

Bump-Bump ---> Exercising your rights to remain silent again?

Delusional? Really? Forgetful?  Your group is grooming new users to become professional shills for your spam campaigns ---> In fact ---> if their posts do nothing less than support your scammy projects, then you black list them and sick your puppets to attack their reputations.  It's dirty and it has full support of the DT2 members mentioned above.

So, there's nothing wrong with this?  \/ \/ \/ But, non-professional shilling or wearing a competitive product's sig will get a blacklist?

vis -`a - vis: Blazed (DT) advertises for yahoo62278 (DT) ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/blazed-134378 ---> And yahoo62278 (DT) is also endorsed by actmyname (DT) who claims yahoo62278 "Top notch forum member" here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017 But yahoo62278 managed Chain of Points (which robbed me personally)---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/chain-of-points-signature-campaignclosed-1801121 ---> then exited ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28711786 ---> and who also managed---> Ore-Mine (fake cloudmine ponzi)   https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12353698 ---> then continued to manage the product during an obvious exit with Christmas and New Years specials https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13516198  ---> which did finally exit ( and also robbed me personally)---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.1940  And, don't forget master-P --> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13377202 ---> because he lent his name to the ore-mine scam too.

But, don't say anything ---> right?  Or, we'll get extorted, blacklisted, or painted with negative trust by your shill armies ---> right?  It's dirty.

It's obvious you're butthurt over your red trust but let's not drag me into your delusional thought process. I by no means have ever pulled off or tried pulling off any exit scam. Masterp and his bs had nothing to do with me except his retarded ass robbed me of 7btc

Laugh out Loud!  Most of the DT members are part of the trust abuse syndicate!  I've been ripped off by members of the SMAS group several times and when I complained, they sicked their sock puppets on me ---> Don't be fooled, they're only in this to propagate their scams.   However, Ognasty and Hilariousandco are a couple of the more legitimate members on the forum --- >they just don't have the power to prevent the group of other DT'ers from coordinating their attacks.  Just realize that the trust system was designed to reward the better thieves in the crypto-economic space ---> That's no secret, so just ignore the trust ratings because those with green paint are the least trustworthy on the site.  Don't trust anybody here until they've earned your trust personally, and build your own trust network because the scammers are in control here and nobody can prevent it.

They all go back and forth giving each other green trust for pulling off big scams while making false accusations and marking their competitors campaign members with red trust for simply participating in a competitive campaingn.




Yup....first honest thing you've said that I can relate to here.  The SMAS group has been abusing the trust system and ripping people off for years and nobody says a thing about it ---> In fact, they rip people off, give their victims red trust when they complain, then give one another green trust so that they can pull off better scams.  And it's all done with the blessings of the site moderators.  It's funny how obvious it is when you guys cover one another's dishonest behavior by giving each other green trust, like you congratulating yahoo62278 ( and by proximity --> master-P), after they pulled a couple huge exit scams.  So, yup, I agree ---> scams are acceptable here but bad posts are intolerable.

Last time you marked me for not providing enough proof  ---> I have the proof if you want it.

I'm was certainly not criticising the quality of English at all... and I'm not saying that the account (or any account) should be tagged simply for having "substandard" English. Honestly, I'm generally super impressed by any non-native English speaker who tries to learn English. It's a terrible language with a lot of confusing "rules" and quirks... and my skills are simply terrible... I can usually only manage "yes, no, please, thank-you and I'd like two beers, please" in most languages

But I digress, I am merely asking whether or not you are the original owner of the "AngelSky" account.

You wanted people to investigate your case, claiming you had been unfairly treated by Lauda, being placed on the SMAS list etc. By doing so, you effectively encouraged people to look into your posting history. I merely observed a large posting gap between ~2013 and 2017 and the fairly marked difference in English between the posts from 2013 and the more recent posts starting in 2017.

This generally tends to indicate that account has been "sold" (or transferred, hacked etc) and is no longer in the possession of the original owner. Now, while account sales are not strictly prohibited by any forum rule... they are generally frowned upon as they tend to facilitate scams and spammers... people buying higher ranked accounts with clean trust to either leverage that "high rank" or clean/positive trust to trick people into believing they are trustworthy... or to leverage the rank/trust to participate in sig campaigns or "bounties" and then generally litter the forum with low quality posts with, in a lot of cases, relatively poor English that do little to improve the forum.

So, my question still stands... are you the original owner of the "AngelSky" account?

You've sent him 3 -ve, after that he sent you negative for lying/spamming/whatever and after that you removed 3 negative and sent him one, and in meanwhile you opened this topic.
It looks to me like you are trolling him.

---

Not really.
Subject is Check Lauda's untrusted feedback, before you trust her and by your logic this has to apply to everyone, including you, and you have been negative tagged by timelord.
So, why don't you answer HCP's question?
 
It is very simple yes/no question.

I hope you do not meaning for trolling. Please Google that first and then you can come here. Because of the her incorrect work, now and being in this situation with red tag. If trust can be given to any person. I hope lauda would be most untrusted person in this forum. Because of her behavior and irresponsibility.

---

Complete out of box answer to my query. I know HCP is the one of the most of active person on Technical support. I really found your post most helpful to all but you are failed in my thread.

If you see the E-mail has been shared from the US and UK people normally no connects with the any grammar at all. Do you think forum, blog and chatting web apps are meant to use the Shakespeare's literature level English.

Even people does not moderate level English allow them to learn it. These kind of grammar view make the people to use Grammarly or GingerCheck. Hope you are not such kind of person.

@OP... And what would you say if something theorised that your account is a "sold" account that is not in possession of the original owner? Would you deny this and say that you are the original owner of this account since 2013?

Recent post with "sketchy" grammar and sentence structure:


Old post from 2013 (before the GIANT posting gap) showing fairly decent English:

Well its not butthurted either if you want to be pernickety its butthurt. I think butthurted is the Chinese for bumrape.. though I could be wrong, I am only taking it from the joke - what time do you go to the Chinese dentist? Toothhurty.. 2.30 get it?

That's not how you're supposed to use the word butthurted though?


"An inappropriately strong negative emotional response from a perceived personal insult. Characterized by strong feelings of shame. Frequently associated with a cessation of communication and overt hostility towards the "aggressor.""

Being butthurt usually means you're in the wrong

...how to troll lauda...

I am not sure this for Ultralite or me. If you this about him. Behaving tit for tat is not happened here. All fake negative trust rated on me not a true information. I do not know whether he think the negative I gave is right or wrong.

But few hours back I removed other negative trust which I gave her. still I did not remove the last neg trust I gave for abusing the power. Because still I getting my buthurted on my profile.

Hope she remove the negative trust since she thinks I am spreading the fake news about her. I do not want get into problem that is the only reason I have removed these negative trust I gave her. Please do the same to me.

I think he was acknowledging we all had posted our opinions on the subject.   

Thanks for the answer sir. Hope lauda will be take the red tag off from me. I really get my buthurted because her negative trust now. If it is true one. I can take it as without dragging anything. Really sad that I got negative when mistake not mine.


@lauda I have already mentioned in my last post. I request you to release from this red tag. I have done the wrong to you. I apologize for all the problem I done from my side. Please help me out.

---

I agree her good deeds as well mate people like us who are all wanna bring them with the hard opportunities will get her red tag means we will loose all the efforts done.
I expect lauda to take me off from this red tag. I acknowledge here there is no speak about her on this foum.

You got it. Really red tag paining here lot.

Please stop mentioning me in these issues that have nothing to do with me. I’ve already left feedback for Lauda and excluded him from my trust network. Talk to those who support him if you want change.

You know nobody except some made up usernames. People will behave with you the way you behave with them. Tit for tat.

Congratulations on having scooped out your (till now) working brain and having thrown it down the snake pit to join the zombie gang of bitcointalk. Still, who cares?

And forget all the good things that Lauda has done for this forum? Decision came from aTriz and not Lauda.

Again decision came from aTriz and not Lauda. You are trying to use this opportunity to drag people who are innocent simply because you yourself are not willing to accept your own bad deeds. The truth stings hard - doesnt it? I can feel ya pain. But the wise thing would be to accept it and move on. Chill out.

I know all you have replied here. If any abuses the power. That would not be asked by anyone huh? When is having the mistake purely I do not know why you are not asking herself to behave properly with the normal forum member.

Since I saw the aTriz problem, I am getting more faith over Ognasty that he can shoot out the worst people like Lauda who is use the power on normal people without valid proof.

If she indirectly linked to aTriz issue. She should be tagged for that and the issue she done to me.

Moderators don't deal with anything in the trust system. Scams are not moderated. Trust is not moderated. The only thing moderators cover is anything that violates the rules (i.e. spam, wrong section, explicitly illegal content).

The aTriz case is indirectly linked to Lauda.