A huge problem with the campaigns is that the campaign managers being chosen for many of these spamfest campaigns are unaccountable and have low-standards. There needs to be some kind of standard when it comes to campaign management, and that would fix a large portion of it. This is seldom found within the campaigns run by extremely reputable campaign managers, and once it has been sniffed out it is eradicated quickly. Some kind of accountability for campaign managers, standards for being a campaign participant or something along these lines would be very beneficial to the situation.
Centralizing signature campaigns entirely sounds pretty rough, but maybe some kind of regulation on either the participants, managers or campaigns themselves would do equally well.
Centralizing signature campaigns entirely sounds pretty rough, but maybe some kind of regulation on either the participants, managers or campaigns themselves would do equally well.
I think the thing that makes the forums even more evolved is that the members feel free to work on forums, the purpose of the signature campaign I think is simply a bonus for the members. and now people are abusing it as a way of making money.
Of course BTT is based on the first bitcoin forum and was created by Satoshi, as well as BTC and altcoin now. People will have to adapt to it.
