But according to rumors, some of the major investors - the wallets participating in the Etherium ICO - are affiliated with the Chinese government.
Ethereum ICO was a long time ago. During that time governments had no idea how to regulate, or even if they needed to regulate crypto. But you shouldn't use rumors as a source anyway.
"I don't have a candle", as they say. Although the first mention of China’s interests in the development of CBDC dates back to 2014, and Etherium’s ICO was in 2016. My statement did not refer to an attempt to spread such a rumor and pass it off at face value, but to the fact that there is another opinion on the issue of “China and cryptocurrencies”.
China is not fighting cryptocurrencies as innovations, but as means of payment. In this way they are trying to fight corruption and the outflow of capital abroad. Other governments do the same, but in a slightly different form (SEC, EU Commission).
This is a misconseption by people who don't understand how blockchains work in the first place.
Native tokens, or coins as a payment are inseparable part of decentralized blockchain tech. Incentives you get for protecting (mining or staking) the blockchain have to be worth something in order to motivate people to keep the chain secure. Otherwise it would need a whole new mechanism and i for one don't have a clue what kind of system that would be. Instances that claim they are only interested them as innovations, not payment methods either don't know what they are talking about, or want to sell us snake oil version of "cryptocurrencies" that are highly centralized spying network, that is operated by the authorities.
Ok, maybe I was too moralistic about “corruption and capital outflow”. Let me put it simply, we are talking about total control of the finances of citizens (of any country). Native tokens, consensuses, decentralization and other global principles of blockchain in this aspect, IMHO, are not correct to indicate. In the context of the thread, we are talking about USDT - a cryptocurrency pegged with an exchange rate to USD, the issuer of which is Tether. The National Bank and the Chinese authorities cannot regulate it, except to prohibit cross-border payments and, in general, its turnover in China, equating them to transactions with foreign currency. Therefore, comrade worker, keep the digital yuan and the catwife.