To OP:
I am not sure what you expected. I know what I expected. I expected that sooner or later China would give guidance on BTC. And I DID NOT for one minute expect China would say BTC was awesome, go get some, we will make it an official secondary currency.
Contrary - I actually posted a thread/poll a week ago asking people what they thought would happen to the price of BTC if/when China banned bitcoin.
I expected something from China. The fact that they haven't banned it is a positive.
In fact they called it a commodity. An investment vehicle. That's not too bad.
They said banks and financial institutions couldn't deal with it, so we won't have it on the China stock market or have a China ETF. That's a bummer, but I don't think any reasonable person would have expected this.
Can merchants accept it now? That's what everyone is debating. But it looks like they can, as I don't think China has a stipulation on what a merchant can accept as payment, AS LONG as the merchant pays taxes on the profit of what they sold.
Maybe I'm wrong, but you don't know the answer to this. We will find out sooner than later.
ANYWAY, the point here is that you seem to think that BTC and the world economy in general begin and end with China.
I strongly disagree. Bitcoin does not need communist China on board.
If Bitcoin gets to be traded as a commodity in China and some merchants accept it as payment then that a BONUS.
What did you REALLY expect? Bitcoin to go to the moon without taking a bunch of punches. The world news on BTC the last 2 months has been better than my wildest dreams. We are WAY OVERDUE for bad news, for blow back, for regulatory powers to flex their muscles.
That has to be expected.
Maybe that put a damper on your plans to see your BTC worth 10k each next year.
Sorry about that.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin, the honey badger, don't give a shit.
If you can't buy stuff with bitcoins as some believe is the new regulation, then I stand by what I said: that Bitcoin has been rendered pretty useless within China. I never said this would kill Bitcoin or anything of that sort. I do believe it should have a profound effect on the current price (which I'll admit hasn't really materialized to this point) because the catalyst for moving from 120$ to 1200$ was in one word, China.
There was this premise building (started by the Winklevoss twins) that the USA was forced to accept Bitcoin because otherwise it would push innovation to China - that premise has now fallen flat on its face. The US could take similar action against Bitcoin, perhaps even go a bit further, and Bitcoin's progress will have been pushed back considerably. I imagine many nations following in the footsteps of both China and the US if they take a similar stance on BTC.
So now Bitcoin is once again highly reliant on the US government to stay afloat and possibly thrive. That is a highly dangerous place to be in considering the implications of what a successful Bitcoin adoption means to the USD. Unless large institutional money enters its way into BTC, I foresee a drawn out correction in BTC back into the mid hundreds.