Pages:
Author

Topic: Chinese community consensus to stay with Core 1MB. Meeting held Jan 24 Shenzen, - page 4. (Read 2770 times)

legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
why do u post fud and then attempt to post a relevant post

its like ur working for a bank, and ur attempts to raise blocksize

are hopeless, they just wont do it,

raising the blocksize is not a bad thing.. the debate about blocksize has been scrambled and meandered into the debate of WHO wrote a particular implementation..
im against R3 for many reasons and i dont care about all that bandcamp drama and motives..

all that matters is clean code that does exactly as expected..

all i care about is being ready for the 2mb blocks which consensus has shown will happen..(whether thats soon or in a year).. whenever the community as a whole is ready..
 it just needs to be implemented properly by everyone, without having any corrupt extra code that can be abused by R3 to make bankers happy.. or extra code to make bitcoin obsolete in favour of blockstreams 'liquid'

they are facing a halving a 50% profit squeeze they will not increase the blocksize

until bitcoin hits $2000 let the market work itslef out, banks cant wreck the code

its a public ledger and the miners will inspect any code updates,

banks want cheaper transactions, they invented the problem

with fiat inflation now they are facing obosoletion its sweet justice
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 500
Chinese community consensus to stay with Core 1MB. Meeting held Jan 24 Shenzen, many Chinese BTC companies including AntPool/Bitmain, Bither, HaoBTC, BTC123, BTCKan

Source: http://8btc.com/thread-28405-1-1.html

I really hope they do take this seriously.

China has the most interest in bitcoin these day.

Having them control the most of the bitcoin network is very dangerous. In the end people will just leave bitcoin which means they and they only will trade bitcoin.
Seeing so many investors going out, means 1 thing.

Goodbye bitcoin, and goodbye profit.

So yes I really hope they put their ignorant minds away and make a decision which will benefit the whole community and not just their pockets.

You are so right.
The chinese has been arrogant in this whole discussion. Fact is, some increase of the size is needed.

Just look how micro-transactions will stop working. Isn't that one of the pillars of bitcoin?

Sending micro transactions with low fee?
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Chinese community consensus to stay with Core 1MB. Meeting held Jan 24 Shenzen, many Chinese BTC companies including AntPool/Bitmain, Bither, HaoBTC, BTC123, BTCKan

Source: http://8btc.com/thread-28405-1-1.html

I really hope they do take this seriously.

China has the most interest in bitcoin these day.

Having them control the most of the bitcoin network is very dangerous. In the end people will just leave bitcoin which means they and they only will trade bitcoin.
Seeing so many investors going out, means 1 thing.

Goodbye bitcoin, and goodbye profit.

So yes I really hope they put their ignorant minds away and make a decision which will benefit the whole community and not just their pockets.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
why do u post fud and then attempt to post a relevant post

its like ur working for a bank, and ur attempts to raise blocksize

are hopeless, they just wont do it,

raising the blocksize is not a bad thing.. the debate about blocksize has been scrambled and meandered into the debate of WHO wrote a particular implementation..
im against R3 for many reasons and i dont care about all that bandcamp drama and motives..

all that matters is clean code that does exactly as expected..

all i care about is being ready for the 2mb blocks which consensus has shown will happen..(whether thats soon or in a year).. whenever the community as a whole is ready..
 it just needs to be implemented properly by everyone, without having any corrupt extra code that can be abused by R3 to make bankers happy.. or extra code to make bitcoin obsolete in favour of blockstreams 'liquid'
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
there are only 100 nodes in china.. who cares..
the community consensus of china is small.. its more about miners.. (separate argument)

im just glad they are not going to push out >1mb blocks.. that way us 5000 full node users can upgrade to be ready for >1mb (as a buffer) way before miners start deciding to spit them out.

much better that miners wait, which is exactly what they should do to avoid their attempts getting orphaned.. rather than miners spitting them out too eagerly and them losing out

now i feel more comfortable with my larger maxblocksize because i know the chinese miners wont be spitting out lots of orphans just yet, my setting can happily sit there and be not important for a while. until everyone else upgrades and then.. and only then will miners spit out bigger blocks

why do u post fud and then attempt to post a relevant post

its like ur working for a bank, and ur attempts to raise blocksize

are hopeless, they just wont do it,
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
there are only 100 nodes in china.. who cares..
the community consensus of china is small.. its more about miners.. (separate argument)

im just glad they are not going to push out >1mb blocks.. that way us 5000 full node users can upgrade to be ready for >1mb (as a buffer) way before miners start deciding to spit them out.

much better that miners wait, which is exactly what they should do to avoid their attempts getting orphaned.. rather than miners spitting them out too eagerly and them losing out

now i feel more comfortable with my larger maxblocksize because i know the chinese miners wont be spitting out lots of orphans just yet, my setting can happily sit there and be not important for a while. until everyone else upgrades and then.. and only then will miners spit out bigger blocks
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
good. maybe Chinese bitcoin community with their mining power can put an end to this block size debate that is hurting bitcoin by dividing people into two groups.

That's the beautiful thing about it. They're putting the end to the debate every 10 minutes by mining smaller than 1MB block.

And we have 394800 smaller than 1MB blocks!
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
Chinese community consensus to stay with Core 1MB. Meeting held Jan 24 Shenzen, many Chinese BTC companies including AntPool/Bitmain, Bither, HaoBTC, BTC123, BTCKan

Source: http://8btc.com/thread-28405-1-1.html

good. maybe Chinese bitcoin community with their mining power can put an end to this block size debate that is hurting bitcoin by dividing people into two groups.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
Satoshi Nakamoto participated the meeting as well. He voiced his opinion that we should keep the 1MB limit that we respected since the creation of Bitcoin back in 2008.

is that supposed to be a joke?
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
Satoshi Nakamoto participated the meeting as well. He voiced his opinion that we should keep the 1MB limit that we respected since the creation of Bitcoin back in 2008.
sr. member
Activity: 689
Merit: 269
Chinese community consensus to stay with Core 1MB. Meeting held Jan 24 Shenzen, many Chinese BTC companies including AntPool/Bitmain, Bither, HaoBTC, BTC123, BTCKan

Source: http://8btc.com/thread-28405-1-1.html
Pages:
Jump to: