Topic: Circulating supply matters to you? - page 3. (Read 1118 times)

It doesn’t matter if a project have good response for investors. If they have strong community support with promising development and partnership many old project then we can trust him. There are many old project who have there larger investors community so you can also check there supply lot of.

A project that has a low circulating supply may not necessarily be a bad investment, but it may pose some risks, such as high volatility, low liquidity, and potential manipulation by whales or insiders. On the other hand, a project that has a high circulating supply may not necessarily be a good investment, but it may offer some benefits, such as stability, accessibility, and scalability.

Not sure. But I can tell you that any circulating supply above the "millions" is totally not worth it. That's if you're looking into coins that're ideal as a store of value. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dash all have an extremely-limited circulating supply. The max supply is also lower compared to other coins being traded on the market today. You can invest into them now, and obtain huge returns in the future (especially Bitcoin). I cannot say the same about Ethereum, Cardano, BNB, and the likes. These have large circulating supplies, making them useful only as digital cash.

Depending on your needs, will be the type of coin to choose. Be advised that just because a coin has a large circulating supply, doesn't mean it's destined to failure. It's all about how active the coin is in terms of development and innovation, and what use cases it provides to the world. As long as you play your cards right, you'll be able to avoid losing it all further down the road. Who knows which altcoins will be able to stand the test of time? Just my thoughts

I think it really affects. coins with less circulation have a pretty good development. especially if the project is needed, while the circulation is not that big. doing so will drive the quality and price of the coin. Meanwhile, coins with very large circulation sometimes tend not to be so good. this will make the coin have a lower price because the coin is easy to get. besides that, we've seen Terra fall due to having too many circulating supplies.

its almost like these total supply or even circulating supply are the only thing that holding some coins from growing further.
the massive supply just making people reluctant to invest, but even then there are many coin with massive total supply that become successful one of them are ethereum and matic.
so total supply doesn't necessarily means hard to grow for a coin but instead it might be just to keep value from being too high, its different if its meme coin though since usually they have trillions of supply it doesn't make sense sometimes. but then again those coins being labeled a meme coin for reason.

it matters so much to the point that I think when I found one coin that have such massive supply yet weak use case i'd instantly consider such coin to be just outright shit coin with no excuse whatsoever.
it just doesn't matter how many effort they spent developing their coin if these two thing which is supply and use case doesn't go really well together i'd just instantly refrain from investing.

Depend on the niche the token or coin will be used. If the niche is potentialy will be used for many people or have very big potential to be mass adopted i prefer coin with big circullation between 1 billion to 100 billion coin in circullation

Yes right circulating does matter to me because if i bought a token price 1$ from ico, ieo, ido with billion supply then this type token price never rising 1$. I was buying some token before but i was taken loss because there supply high and price death after listing exchange. Even some of project has success but if they have larger investors community.

In tokenomics, it is also important to pay attention to the coin unlocking schedule of major investors and project founders. Also pay attention to the distribution of supply between community, early investors and founders. If the funders have a large percentage of the coin supply and it will be unlocked within 6 months after listing, then such a project may be subject to rug pull risk, where the project funders will quickly sell their tokens to the community and then stop supporting their project.

For digital currency, there are various projects to support it, and it can be circulated smoothly, so it will have a high value.  There are too many types of digital currencies. It is not easy to find gold and diamond varieties from all kinds of garbage. Let's discuss, what are the specific conditions for the next cryptocurrency to appreciate?

The concept of  Circulating supply has a relevant relationship with cryptocurrencies and digital assets. Circulating supply refers to the total number of tokens of a particular cryptocurrency that are actively circulating in the market. Total supply plays an important role in determining the market value and liquidity of cryptocurrencies. A trader attraction to that token increases over the total supply. Aggregate supply that only determines the value of tokens does not act on market demand, utility, etc.

When there is a big supply but no demand in the coin the price of the coin will not be high. That is why first of all it is necessary to create the demand in the coin and only after that to create the demand of the coin and only after that to create a supply.

In first phase, I don't see circulating supply in a new project, i am looking their products how much promising and how effective it has real use cases in the market. Than circulating is important, comparing low circulating coins have good chances to increase high. But it's dose not matter if project is bad.

The capitalization of the coin depends of it supply and price of the coin. The more capitalization has the coin the more stable it is. It is very important to invest in coins with high capitalization because they are more stable.

Actually, it does matter because not every project can gain as much success as the ones you've mentioned, and we have seen what generally happens with tokens or coins that have very high supplies, look at the meme coins which have very high supplies and that is the reason why they struggle to gain significant value even if they get a lot of investments, they only manage to reach a few cents only because of their supplies which are infinite.

So generally, even if the project is good and has a good team and serves some purpose, it will have more chances of getting success and gaining a significant value over time if it has a limited supply just like Bitcoin because supply and demand do play a great role in this.

I would choose a project that already has supply circulation close to max supply. Because if a token still has a total circulation of less than 20% of the max supply then I can say that there will be a possibility that in the future the price will decrease as the amount of supply increases to the circulating supply.

I completely understand your inclination towards low-supply coins and their potential for being pumped in the crypto market. While it's true that coins with low circulating supply can be more susceptible to price manipulation, it's important to consider a range of factors when evaluating the success and long-term prospects of a cryptocurrency.

The developers and team behind a project play a crucial role in determining its credibility and future growth. Their genuine commitment to the project, technical expertise, and active engagement with the community are vital factors that can contribute to the success of a coin. It's crucial to assess the team's track record, their responsiveness to community feedback, and their ability to deliver on the project's roadmap.

While low supply can create scarcity and potentially drive up the price, it doesn't guarantee the coin's success on its own. Market demand, adoption potential, use case, technological innovation, and overall market conditions also play significant roles in shaping the destiny of a cryptocurrency.

Furthermore, it's important to acknowledge that not all low-supply coins experience significant price appreciation or gain long-term value. The crypto market is dynamic, influenced by various factors such as market sentiment, regulatory developments, and technological advancements. Therefore, it's essential to conduct thorough research and due diligence before investing in any coin, regardless of its supply metrics.

Diversification and a well-rounded investment strategy are key in navigating the crypto market. By spreading investments across different coins with varying supply levels, one can potentially mitigate risk and capitalize on different opportunities.

In summary, while low supply can increase the potential for price manipulation and pump and dump schemes, success in the crypto market is not solely dependent on supply metrics. It's crucial to evaluate the overall project, team credibility, market dynamics, and community engagement to make informed investment decisions.

Remember to stay updated, conduct thorough research, and approach the crypto market with a critical mindset. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries inherent risks, and it's important to make informed decisions aligned with your investment goals.

Yes, for me it counts is one of the first things i look at before investing, let's say that the max supply must be relatively low so as the altcoin can acquire more value over time and the team must not retain more than 20% as reserves

There are many coins in the crypto market that experience pump and dump, and I believe that coins with low circulating supply have a higher chance of being pumped compared to coins with high supply. However, I must admit that there are some exceptions to this rule, but my preference is always for low-supply coins. Nevertheless, it cannot be said that a coin will be successful just because it has a low supply. It largely depends on the developers and team behind it, their genuineness, and how actively they work on their projects. Simply having a low supply doesn't make much of a difference.

So, can you expect another xrp or ethereum to come at this moment? it's caused by ethereum has proven its reliability for long term. The new projects were only abusing the unlimited supply for shady things only.

BNB as limited supply and it's wrong if you called it has unlimited supply at this moment.