it is 6:05 pm in NJ gives us just under 6 hours for a third.
Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED - page 44. (Read 162886 times)
I will take every fourth block for a while
it is 6:05 pm in NJ gives us just under 6 hours for a third.
it is 6:05 pm in NJ gives us just under 6 hours for a third.
Wow a double good block 53% then 1.2%
Wow, two blocks in bout thirty minutes!!
http://ckpool.org/blocks/537980.confirmed
Pool average now 105.36
Code:
[2018-08-22 17:02:20.907] Possible block solve diff 39027755591568.484375 !
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.005] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.010] Solved block 537977 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.30x17
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.011] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.3P", "hashrate5m": "75.1P", "hashrate1hr": "75.5P", "hashrate1d": "74.8P", "hashrate7d": "70.3P"}
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.011] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.30x17:{"hashrate1m": "13.8T", "hashrate5m": "15.3T", "hashrate1hr": "15.9T", "hashrate1d": "15.3T", "hashrate7d": "12.5T"}
[2018-08-22 17:02:30.030] Hash for block height 537977 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.245] Possible block solve diff 6502168937761.557617 !
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.360] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.841] Solved block 537980 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x147
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.938] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.5P", "hashrate5m": "76.3P", "hashrate1hr": "75.6P", "hashrate1d": "74.8P", "hashrate7d": "70.3P"}
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.939] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x147:{"hashrate1m": "16.7T", "hashrate5m": "15.2T", "hashrate1hr": "16.2T", "hashrate1d": "16.7T", "hashrate7d": "16.7T"}
[2018-08-22 17:36:50.069] Hash for block height 537980 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.005] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.010] Solved block 537977 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.30x17
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.011] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.3P", "hashrate5m": "75.1P", "hashrate1hr": "75.5P", "hashrate1d": "74.8P", "hashrate7d": "70.3P"}
[2018-08-22 17:02:21.011] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.30x17:{"hashrate1m": "13.8T", "hashrate5m": "15.3T", "hashrate1hr": "15.9T", "hashrate1d": "15.3T", "hashrate7d": "12.5T"}
[2018-08-22 17:02:30.030] Hash for block height 537977 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.245] Possible block solve diff 6502168937761.557617 !
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.360] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.841] Solved block 537980 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x147
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.938] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.5P", "hashrate5m": "76.3P", "hashrate1hr": "75.6P", "hashrate1d": "74.8P", "hashrate7d": "70.3P"}
[2018-08-22 17:33:12.939] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x147:{"hashrate1m": "16.7T", "hashrate5m": "15.2T", "hashrate1hr": "16.2T", "hashrate1d": "16.7T", "hashrate7d": "16.7T"}
[2018-08-22 17:36:50.069] Hash for block height 537980 confirms block was CONFIRMED
https://btc.com/block/537977
https://btc.com/block/537980
Wow a double good block 53% then 1.2%
Wow, two blocks in bout thirty minutes!!
http://ckpool.org/blocks/537980.confirmed
Pool average now 105.36
Wow a double good block 53% then 1.2%
Wow, two blocks in bout thirty minutes!!
Wow a double good block 53% then 1.2%
Code:
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.376] Possible block solve diff 6648201862921.397461 !
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.474] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] Solved block 537830 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc43x196
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.4P", "hashrate5m": "75.2P", "hashrate1hr": "75.4P", "hashrate1d": "73.5P", "hashrate7d": "69.5P"}
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc43x196:{"hashrate1m": "20.6T", "hashrate5m": "18.5T", "hashrate1hr": "17.4T", "hashrate1d": "16.5T", "hashrate7d": "16.6T"}
[2018-08-21 18:14:02.315] Hash for block height 537830 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.474] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] Solved block 537830 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc43x196
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.4P", "hashrate5m": "75.2P", "hashrate1hr": "75.4P", "hashrate1d": "73.5P", "hashrate7d": "69.5P"}
[2018-08-21 18:09:23.480] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc43x196:{"hashrate1m": "20.6T", "hashrate5m": "18.5T", "hashrate1hr": "17.4T", "hashrate1d": "16.5T", "hashrate7d": "16.6T"}
[2018-08-21 18:14:02.315] Hash for block height 537830 confirms block was CONFIRMED
https://btc.com/block/537830
Is it still morning in Oregon?
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
yeah a 116 so so but I did a rental so it helps out.
Is it still morning in Oregon?
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
11:20am, could be debatable. Still plenty of time to double up today. Two block Tuesday? %
(groan...)
Is it still morning in Oregon?
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
11:20am, could be debatable. Still plenty of time to double up today. Two block Tuesday? %
Is it still morning in Oregon?
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
If so, then it's "a good Block morning to y'all..."
537,830
# ? $
I only ever worked on the T1, they used the same starting code for T2 - which I only ever tested remotely - and presumably T2T. I've had nothing to do with Inno since then. There's a reason my coding for the hardware was intense for a couple of months and then stopped abruptly. The relationship between myrig, halong and inno is complicated and strained, to say the least, but I'm not informed of all the details and neither do I want to be. Inno did ask me to help "advertise" their hardware, which I refused to do. That's clearly not something I would ever do for any manufacturer anyway.
Yea, shilling is a fine line anyway. You would want sales persons/marketers to do that not someone writing software/coding. I've always wondered about the happenings cause it was great to see Halong take off for a minute but seems a lot may have gotten missed with three separate entities trying to work fluidly, harmoniously through one project.
Apologies, four counting yourself.
I only ever worked on the T1, they used the same starting code for T2 - which I only ever tested remotely - and presumably T2T. I've had nothing to do with Inno since then. There's a reason my coding for the hardware was intense for a couple of months and then stopped abruptly. The relationship between myrig, halong and inno is complicated and strained, to say the least, but I'm not informed of all the details and neither do I want to be. Inno did ask me to help "advertise" their hardware, which I refused to do. That's clearly not something I would ever do for any manufacturer anyway.
Yea, shilling is a fine line anyway. You would want sales persons/marketers to do that not someone writing software/coding. I've always wondered about the happenings cause it was great to see Halong take off for a minute but seems a lot may have gotten missed with three separate entities trying to work fluidly, harmoniously through one project.
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)
This is pretty note worthy. This was for the T2T or back with with DM T1?
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)
This is pretty note worthy. This was for the T2T or back with with DM T1?
yeah it appears to be a really nice unit I will be getting another tomorrow.
Be sure to give me your link in a pm for referral.
efficiency mode has stayed in the 1444 to 1457 watt mode at my meter
and about 17.2 to 18.4 th.
I was hoping for a little better power number but i have multiple meters and will test them all.
Awesome, just click on a link to the site from bitcoinhackers.org or twitter post and just run through the order or use the same window to request a btc quote. I get 0.05% from the 2% commission they charge if a sale is earned, mfb get's the greatest (objectively) social marketer.
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
Well its simple selling gear that is set to blow up the psu makes them more money or so they think.
Your firmware is why I still own my 5 T's
and It is why I purchased the T2 Turbo model.
If you have a hundred or two hundred units in a cold place and really cheap power you can gamble that the faster settings will pay off.
If coins spike like mad you can also push the machines.
But when margins are tight or the weather is hot the efficiency and balance settings are really good.
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.) the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived.
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes.
yeah it appears to be a really nice unit I will be getting another tomorrow.
Be sure to give me your link in a pm for referral.
efficiency mode has stayed in the 1444 to 1457 watt mode at my meter
and about 17.2 to 18.4 th.
I was hoping for a little better power number but i have multiple meters and will test them all.
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived.
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes.
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived.
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase
go to bottom of this link
http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr
"workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1",
"hashrate1m": "21.8T",
"hashrate5m": "17T",
"hashrate1hr": "2.8T",
"hashrate1d": "125G",
"hashrate7d": "17.9G",
"lastshare": 1534794072,
"shares": 2534795,
"bestshare": 4768300.0,
"lns": 2533888.463873493,
"luck": 1.05,
"herp": 2649546.48057697
}
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
Jump to: