Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 700. (Read 3839391 times)
is anyone experiencing any unpaid balance issues flycastpool not increasing for over an hour
cpu usage 30% with 3 gpu ( 2x 280x and 1 7950), hash increased with ~12 %
Just tested Claymore V2.0
Got a speed bump on all my RX480 8Gb and RX470 8gb
V1:
46-50 sols
V2:
48-55 sols. Sometime even upto 57 sols!
GPU0 and GPU2 = RX480 8GB
Running modded bios.
Some said power usage are more. For me, it is about the same reading from my smartplug (with history log)
Note: GPU3 alway the slowest one even on eth and connected to dual 1440p monitor. I am using Core i7 3770 non-k. Had to turn off CPU mining to achieve higher hashing. Once I turn on -t 4. It slow down by 10 sols for all 4 cards.
https://postimg.org/image/wq72s40dj/
https://postimg.org/image/wq72s40dj/
Got a speed bump on all my RX480 8Gb and RX470 8gb
V1:
46-50 sols
V2:
48-55 sols. Sometime even upto 57 sols!
GPU0 and GPU2 = RX480 8GB
Running modded bios.
Some said power usage are more. For me, it is about the same reading from my smartplug (with history log)
Note: GPU3 alway the slowest one even on eth and connected to dual 1440p monitor. I am using Core i7 3770 non-k. Had to turn off CPU mining to achieve higher hashing. Once I turn on -t 4. It slow down by 10 sols for all 4 cards.
https://postimg.org/image/wq72s40dj/
https://postimg.org/image/wq72s40dj/
CPU over 85%
hash rate like past and a little lower
I think V1.0 Beta better than other versions .
hash rate like past and a little lower
I think V1.0 Beta better than other versions .
As I said earlier, I confirmed issue with high CPU usage and will try to fix it asap, this issue is related to OpenCL bug, miner must not load CPU.
CPU over 85%
hash rate like past and a little lower
I think V1.0 Beta better than other versions .
hash rate like past and a little lower
I think V1.0 Beta better than other versions .
I had to remove v1.0 and v1.1 from google drive and mega, because I was pointed that I used a small part of mrb's work.
It will take up to 24 hours to revise my code and create own implementation, then I will upload updated version.
Details are:
It will take up to 24 hours to revise my code and create own implementation, then I will upload updated version.
Details are:
Code:
mrb> Claymore, you took and reused my blake.c code and didn't include the copyright notice as required by silentarmy's MIT license:
mrb> https://forum.z.cash/t/silentarmy-v3-now-a-full-miner-multi-gpu-stratum/3580/640
mrb> I request that you cease infringing by:
mrb> (1) either including the full "License" section of silentarmy's README.md along with your distribution of your zcash miner,
mrb> (2) or stop using my blake.c code.
mrb>
mrb> Of course this is only ~100 lines of code, and we are all lazy programmers and I understand why you did it :) but you ought to do the right thing.
mrb> Thanks,
mrb> -Marc Bevand
[/quote]
Oh, you are correct, I really missed this point. I was in a big hurry to release first version asap, so I concentrated on main Wagner's algo,
blake is not interesting for me at this point since it takes only 10% of total GPU time and it's trivial in fact, blake algo is not that I can call something new.
But to make some start point asap I included your blake.c into my sources and then forgot about it and did not create my implementation. That's what happens if you are in a hurry.
It is very unpleasant situation for me, I will do the following:
1. I remove v1.0 and v1.1 versions of my miner. In fact, I already removed current packages from google drive and MEGA, I will upload updated versions soon.
In next version I will remove your blake.c from my sources.
2. I apologize, it's only my fault that I used this part of your code. I was not going to do it in public version.
3. I want to send you some compensation from my ZEC dev fee if you don't mind, just send me your ZEC address.
4. I'm not going to hide my fault in any way, I will post this message in my miner thread in first post.
Thank you for doing the right thing. I fetched your new tarball Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v1.1 Beta - LINUX - Catalyst 15.12.tar.gz and can confirm you included the MIT license as mandated in your "Readme!!!.txt" file, as quoted below.
You are in no way obligated to "pay" me. But if you feel this can help re-establish some of your image and reputation, feel free to publicly send to my donation address t1cVviFvgJinQ4w3C2m2CfRxgP5DnHYaoFC
You are now fully compliant with the MIT license. I hope my SILENTARMY code was useful to you
Code:
==========
This miner uses some code of SILENTARMY OpenCL GPU Zcash Equihash solver:
# License
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Marc Bevand
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
-Marc Bevand
I'm happy that we close this issue! I also donated 5 ZEC (about 2BTC at current prices) to your address t1cVviFvgJinQ4w3C2m2CfRxgP5DnHYaoFC
Confirming huge CPU load . due of that lve got hashrate drop from 270 to 230-250. 2*470+4*280x
Back to 1.1
Back to 1.1
on 2.0
High cpu usage and it hard crashed on one of my rigs with 290s, went back to 1.1/
Which is a royal pain in the ass to get going again after hard crash because this is my trouble maker rig
High cpu usage and it hard crashed on one of my rigs with 290s, went back to 1.1/
Which is a royal pain in the ass to get going again after hard crash because this is my trouble maker rig
v2 report
7950 went up by 5 % to 43 h/s
r9 380x same about 31 h/s
anyone with r9 380x here gets more , can u help me with this ?
7950 went up by 5 % to 43 h/s
r9 380x same about 31 h/s
anyone with r9 380x here gets more , can u help me with this ?
Just tried version 2 on a miner with 7970s and another with 370, hashrate decreased by 20 points. From 110h/s to 90h/s, for the first one, and 140h/s to 120h/s for the second one.
... even with "-allpools 1" set there are DefFee: ZEC: Job timeouts in V2 
... seems to be a problem with the eu pools. Once it hits us1-zcash.flypool.org it works.
... seems to be a problem with the eu pools. Once it hits us1-zcash.flypool.org it works.
Try silentarmy versus this - at least on Linux, it seems... the same. So I poked around and pulled the IL and ISA from Claymore's.... the shit IS basically silentarmy, from what I can see. I didn't check every kernel, but it looks like it.
Have you implemented your own kernel for ZEC PoW? If it has good speed, it will look like silentarmy because there is no way to create really different implementation of fast binary tree for Wagner's algo, especially on GPU. But it does not mean that it is silentarmy code. Another example is blake implementation - implement it and its machine code will look similar for all possible implementations because it requires a concrete set and order of operations.
280x up to 47-50 Sols now @ 12.15 drivers
i feel soon 280x is gonna be best cards for ZEC
i feel soon 280x is gonna be best cards for ZEC
I can confirm 280x looks pretty awesome. I wonder where the peak hash rate could be, over 60sol/s?
Zcash is now less profitable than etc, I think people will start switching back over.
Well we had a good 6 day run.
Well we had a good 6 day run.
on a 6 card system with just a dual core with v2.0 it will max out the cpu and bring down the hash rate of the gpus. 216sols
v1.0 didnt do this. so im back to v1.0. 255sols
v1.0 didnt do this. so im back to v1.0. 255sols
I can start start amd tools, amd monitor no gpu info, no temerature etc use diferend drivers. windows 7 .
mining is ok. 4x R9 280x 157 M/h
mining is ok. 4x R9 280x 157 M/h
Can confirm 10% gain on my dual 290x. From 98-102 => 107-111 H/s 
But higher CPU usage and DevFee timeouts.
But higher CPU usage and DevFee timeouts.
After killing nheqminer (was running on 75% - giving ~4 H/s) i gained another 4 from the GPUs. CPU was on 90% is now on 20%.
But I get Lots of "DefFee: ZEC: Job timeouts". I am mining on equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 and "-allpools 1" is set. I just reused the config.txt from version 1.1 that was running here 24h perfect.
Reached 50 sols on rx 470. The only problem is the CPU usage tho. Thanks claymore.
Details of your GPU and setup if you don't mind?
MSI rx470 4gb, using a custom rom ofcourse. Copy paste the 1500 strap timings to 1625, 1750 and 2000. 1950 and 950 mem. Core clock cap at 1126. i7 3770k. I'm getting around 48-50 hash per card. GPU-Z shows around 55-60 watt per card. I also have to say my temps are lowered too.
v2.0:
- improved speed by 5-15% (depends on card model).
About 55H/s on stock 390X, 52H/s on stock 390 and 48H/s on stock 280X.
- improved speed by 5-15% (depends on card model).
About 55H/s on stock 390X, 52H/s on stock 390 and 48H/s on stock 280X.
280x, 48-50H/s
390, 55 H/s (touching up to 60 H/s from time to time)
290x, 55 H/s (touching up to 61.x H/s from time to time)
rx 480 46.x - 49.5 H/s
fury 52 -58 H/s
Reached 50 sols on rx 470. The only problem is the CPU usage tho. Thanks claymore.
Details of your GPU and setup if you don't mind?
Jump to: