Clinton Refuses To Say Whether Or Not She Wiped The Server - page 2.

godlyitems

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: peterson33 on August 20, 2015, 07:35:07 AM

There are many shades of grey in relation to insanity. Also, you might want to check on the definition of colloquialism. Never too late to upgrade ones reading comprehension !

A neurosurgeon that can't figure out that a single human cell is not a living human ? Is a loony bird.

A person that can't figure out the difference between having a religious belief, and forcing that belief on others by the age of 60 should not even be allowed to vote never mind electing this dude into office.

And more diversions.

Now focus like a laser here, this thread is about Hillary not Carson.

Quote from: engwell on August 20, 2015, 06:40:55 AM

The dems are in full panic mode...lolz!

....but what difference does it make?

Yes note the attempts to divert to Bush and abortion here.

godlyitems

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: peterson33 on August 20, 2015, 06:38:34 AM

You have never presented any science that explains why "Science dictates life begins at conception". Naked claims repeated over and over again to not count as a scientific explanation.

You can not even get the terminology correct "Human Life" would be the term you are looking for.

This summary gives 5 different scientific perspectives on when human life begins.

https://www.franklincollege.edu/science_courses/bioethics/When%20does%20human%20life%20begin.pdf

This is from a developmental Biology Textbook and not some biased pro life website.

Unlike our short little quotes which lack context and explanation or rational for claims made. This summary goes into detail about the various arguments.

Yes I have and gave you a link to the thread where it is being discuss further along with other such citations.

But your desperate need to divert here is noted, getting hard to defend Hillary isn't it.

godlyitems

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:36:24 AM

And where were you at that time? You're 62 now, right?

BTW, Hillary and Bill warned Bush about Al qaeda

But where were you on 9/11? I was panicking, trying to find out if loved ones were alive on Manhattan

And yes it does have to do with felony counts, whenBush tried to blame 9/11 on Iraq. Actually it's worse than a felony. He lied about Iraq being involved. There is no doubt about that now. We know Iraq was not involved.

And yet, we sent our own over there to die for nothing. That makes me sick. It should make you sick too. We had no business in Iraq. And now look at it. Look what we did. And now we have more terrorists who hate us.

And you are seriously upset about Benghazi? Wow. Not sure what to say at this point.

Dodges noted, getting a little tough to defend Hillary I see. If you want to make phony claims about Bush and 9/11 start a thread on it.

This is being "upset" that Hillary Clinton more and more looks like she committed a felony in the handling of classified information. You aren't?

peterson33

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: rio3232 on August 20, 2015, 06:50:37 AM

Yes tell us the facts you used to determine the renowned brain surgeon is a loony bird. Also there is no such thing as basically insane. You are either insane or you arent. Now that weve established that backtrack....perhaps you could give us your looney facts.

There are many shades of grey in relation to insanity. Also, you might want to check on the definition of colloquialism. Never too late to upgrade ones reading comprehension !

A neurosurgeon that can't figure out that a single human cell is not a living human ? Is a loony bird.

A person that can't figure out the difference between having a religious belief, and forcing that belief on others by the age of 60 should not even be allowed to vote never mind electing this dude into office.

fungfung

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Amazing so its some down to the Support Hilary no matter what because George Bush ( both of them) were horrible Presidents. /facepalm

Kenchaa

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

"That decision is made by an official. I was that official. I made the decision."

And dems can't see the problem?

They should be in straight jackets. They're a danger to themselves as well as society in general.

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:31:08 AM

Who was president and who made the decisions? Was Hillary the Commander in Chief? Did I miss that?

If you think Presidents make that decision, it's far, far, far, far worse than I thought.

Explains a lot, though.

I'm glad I don't have to read a constant stream of such nonsense. Thank God for forum features.

rio3232

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 04:31:37 AM

Well, you must have missed the entire George W Bush presidency. Welcome to the precedent set by that. Let's look at the lives cost by that, shall we?

Oh wait, war time president, lives lost do not matter, right? Even if it were for no reason? Even if all the reasons were lies? Hey, no problem.

I'll tell you something right now- I have had friends and loved ones lost in W's pointless war. That resulted in tens of thousands of lives lost. For what?

And you cry about a few diplomats? I have words for you, and they are not kind. Regardless of what happened in your imagination of Benghazi, GW Bush sent many Americans to their deaths for NOTHING. NOTHING about Iraq was true, not one damn thing.

That should (*)(*)(*)(*) you off, but it doesn't. You know why? POLITICS. And the fact that your side was wrong. You're more interested in winning than the truth. That cost a lot of families their loved ones.

I am damn sick and tired of this Benghazi crap from the right. I put people in their graves because of the stupid Iraq war. It was pointless and stupid, and I lost folks for nothing.

You start complaining about the Iraq war stupidity, then we can talk Benghazi. Until then, **** off.

Ummmm...mmkaay..Hillary voted for the Iraq war.

tiffany8

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Quote from: KriszDev on August 19, 2015, 01:01:41 PM

I'm sorry, but what proof do you have of these claims? The same might be said of Netanyahu, and the stunt the GOP pulled. Seems to me that many politicians have ties to foreign dignitaries in order to influence policy. I doubt you had any "outrage" over that. Just wait it that one gets used against the GOP, and I suspect at some point it will.

Proof? Clinton history---they are not known for honesty-----take a trip down memory lane at ALL of the Clinton scandals. How did he get the name "Slick Willie"? Truth telling is not one of their strong suits. They are cut from the same cloth.

rio3232

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: arul.BP on August 20, 2015, 06:47:22 AM

I'd support her over any of the clown car nut jobs you people have trotted out.
And your hypocritical partisan outrage is laughable as usual.

Great thanks for raising your hand. You are #3. This whole beat the puppy to death with a bag of kittens on live tv thing is fascinating. So do you think Hillary committed a crime?

rio3232

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: peterson33 on August 19, 2015, 01:43:31 PM

"basically insane" there is a difference. That Carson is a loony bird is a demonstrable fact.

Yes tell us the facts you used to determine the renowned brain surgeon is a loony bird. Also there is no such thing as basically insane. You are either insane or you arent. Now that weve established that backtrack....perhaps you could give us your looney facts.

arul.BP

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: rio3232 on August 19, 2015, 01:09:25 PM

Id like to see a show of hands from any forum members who after watching this will still admit they support her. That will be hilarious.

I'd support her over any of the clown car nut jobs you people have trotted out.
And your hypocritical partisan outrage is laughable as usual.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:36:24 AM

Quote from: godlyitems on August 20, 2015, 06:35:38 AM

Your trying to defend Hillary by attempting to inject Bush's roll in the war. I just reminded you Hillary's was the same.

And I was 48 years old pulling into my office when the first reports came over the radio, not that it has to do with anything about Hillary looking at some felony counts here.

And where were you at that time? You're 62 now, right?

BTW, Hillary and Bill warned Bush about Al qaeda

But where were you on 9/11? I was panicking, trying to find out if loved ones were alive on Manhattan

And yes it does have to do with felony counts, whenBush tried to blame 9/11 on Iraq. Actually it's worse than a felony. He lied about Iraq being involved. There is no doubt about that now. We know Iraq was not involved.

And yet, we sent our own over there to die for nothing. That makes me sick. It should make you sick too. We had no business in Iraq. And now look at it. Look what we did. And now we have more terrorists who hate us.

And you are seriously upset about Benghazi? Wow. Not sure what to say at this point.

I'm very upset about an overall trend, which includes Benghazi and the email problem.

I have handled classified documents and been in charge of DOD computer systems which held such material.

If I had mishandled such documents, men with guns would have came for me.

Please don't pull the "Bush" card.

engwell

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

The dems are in full panic mode...lolz!

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSrQ7YnQFFloXrgvouRnCzonxQu0QF-T7OSCGlx6SxlpqsEGx1K

....but what difference does it make?

peterson33

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote

Current Scientific Views of When Human Life Begins

Current perspectives on when human life begins range from fertilization to
gastrulation to birth and even after. Here is a brief examination of each
of the major perspectives with arguments for and against each of the
positions. Contemporary scientific literature proposes a variety of
answers to the question of when human life begins

The summary goes through 5 different current scientific perspectives on when life begins giving arguments for and against each perspective.

Your claim that "Science dictates human life begins at conception" is patently false.

You are a denier of science and a propagator of fallacy.

peterson33

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: godlyitems on August 20, 2015, 04:45:42 AM

ROFL well when it comes to this subject yes it is and the science dictates that life begins at conception when the two haploid organism each produced by a another human being join together and a new life is created at that moment. You don't get to change the science to make your position on abortion more palatable.

You have never presented any science that explains why "Science dictates life begins at conception". Naked claims repeated over and over again to not count as a scientific explanation.

You can not even get the terminology correct "Human Life" would be the term you are looking for.

This summary gives 5 different scientific perspectives on when human life begins.

https://www.franklincollege.edu/science_courses/bioethics/When%20does%20human%20life%20begin.pdf

This is from a developmental Biology Textbook and not some biased pro life website.

Unlike our short little quotes which lack context and explanation or rational for claims made. This summary goes into detail about the various arguments.

KriszDev

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: godlyitems on August 20, 2015, 06:35:38 AM

Your trying to defend Hillary by attempting to inject Bush's roll in the war. I just reminded you Hillary's was the same.

And I was 48 years old pulling into my office when the first reports came over the radio, not that it has to do with anything about Hillary looking at some felony counts here.

And where were you at that time? You're 62 now, right?

BTW, Hillary and Bill warned Bush about Al qaeda

But where were you on 9/11? I was panicking, trying to find out if loved ones were alive on Manhattan

And yes it does have to do with felony counts, whenBush tried to blame 9/11 on Iraq. Actually it's worse than a felony. He lied about Iraq being involved. There is no doubt about that now. We know Iraq was not involved.

And yet, we sent our own over there to die for nothing. That makes me sick. It should make you sick too. We had no business in Iraq. And now look at it. Look what we did. And now we have more terrorists who hate us.

And you are seriously upset about Benghazi? Wow. Not sure what to say at this point.

godlyitems

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:34:28 AM

I supported neither. I am in no quandary.

Your trying to defend Hillary by attempting to inject Bush's roll in the war. I just reminded you Hillary's was the same.

And I was 48 years old pulling into my office when the first reports came over the radio, not that it has to do with anything about Hillary looking at some felony counts here.

KriszDev

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: godlyitems on August 20, 2015, 06:31:47 AM

Who unequivocally lobby for passage making one of the more noteworthy speeches of support on the Senate floor and then proudly cast her vote?

And hey I supported the war and the decisions Bush made along with Hillary's vote.

You're the one in the quandary here not me.

I supported neither. I am in no quandary.

BTW, how old were you during 9/11? I was 34 years old on my way to work on the train in Chicago.

At the time, planes were rumored to be headed for the Sears Tower. I did not know what was going on til I got downtown. People were running up the train platforms.

I got to my office and found out one of the towers was down. Right after that, we saw the second one go down online.

That happened under GWB. NOTHING even close has happened under Obama. But yet, we are told by you GOP faithful, that nothing like that would happen under your watch. Sorry, don't believe you. You need fear to sell your ideology. You would let it happen again if it meant giving you more power. I have no doubt. 9/11 was the best thing to ever happen to GWB. He was useless before that.

Then magically, we went to Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11. A friend of mine who was a 20 year vet, quit the army. His quote? "I am not here to make money for Cheney on the backs of our kids. I am a proud veteran, but I will not be used. This is not a war to protect our people. This is disgusting."

redandblack

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:31:08 AM

Who was president and who made the decisions? Was Hillary the Commander in Chief? Did I miss that?

To paraphrase Jeff Foxworthy, "If you're discussing Bush and his military misadventures in a thread about Hillary and her server issues - You just might be a Thread Derailer."

Mind you, I'm also not sure about how abortion got in here either.

godlyitems

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: KriszDev on August 20, 2015, 06:31:08 AM

Who was president and who made the decisions? Was Hillary the Commander in Chief? Did I miss that?

Who unequivocally lobby for passage making one of the more noteworthy speeches of support on the Senate floor and then proudly cast her vote?

And hey I supported the war and the decisions Bush made along with Hillary's vote.

You're the one in the quandary here not me.

Topic: Clinton Refuses To Say Whether Or Not She Wiped The Server - page 2. (Read 3655 times)