Hello, who know when they open the spreadsheet? Thanks.
They said this would happen 24th November (today), nevertheless I still can not see any difference here lol. 
Topic: Closed - page 91. (Read 136600 times)
Hello, who know when they open the spreadsheet? Thanks.
Looks Like Great Project Who Can Be Big In The Future
Lol, what a troller hahahahha
Looks Like Great Project Who Can Be Big In The Future
And now they cannot change it legally, the bounty distribution will kill the coin price, 34.6% bounty? Fo real? Its like giving free money to others and just kill the project.
ussualy whatever alocation coin to bounty after distribution coin can down price
but slowly or fast, coin price can incraese again
so same in atlant, although alocation bounty is big, next time atlant token price can up again
And not to the organizers of ATLANT, what is the discrepancy of the white paper?
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
Boom. Perfect post.
And this is why I just went ahead and dumped my 2.7 btc worth of ATL (My ico cost) for a 90% loss. I'd rather get something then nothing. Lesson learned. Fucking crooked ass team with their full dev fund (instead of scaling it back with the actual tokens sold), and not scaling back the bounty fund which actually exceeds the ICO and pre-ICO total coin count. If you can't see the bad mathematics here, there is something wrong here. ATL will not recover from this and will be a dead coin with millions of funds raised. Fuck you....I'm out. And good luck to any of the bandwagonners that decide to stick this through.
Those numbers look beyond terrible...I didn't know it was that bad. What was the responsible smoking when allowing 34.6% of total tokens to go to bounty while investors got 24% ? Is there any precedent of ICO with these %? Are the bounty team family members of whoever took the decision or did someone just have a bad day when calculating this? The funniest now are bountyhunters trying to convince others they're not going to dump in the next 4 months and they all believe firmly in this project... I've never spoken bad of any project apart from scamconnect, but this looks bizarre and no I'm not fudding to buy in cheap..Sold my stack the first day it hit ED and couldn't be happier to get out even with small gains. Sorry for the unknowing late investors like the guy above me and good luck and patience to those who stay, you'll need it.
Of course they will dump, and seeing them saying they won't dump was the final reason I needed to get out. It will be a race to get their coins to the exchanges. Polo will never list this shit. Neither will Trex. It's a securities token.
I don't know what IQ that the one who made the computation is but he is stupid. I just hope the team would not just abandon this coin and take all the cash they can. I hope that they have been working on getting listed as many decent trading platforms after delaying the bounty distribution all this time.
And not to the organizers of ATLANT, what is the discrepancy of the white paper?
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
Boom. Perfect post.
And this is why I just went ahead and dumped my 2.7 btc worth of ATL (My ico cost) for a 90% loss. I'd rather get something then nothing. Lesson learned. Fucking crooked ass team with their full dev fund (instead of scaling it back with the actual tokens sold), and not scaling back the bounty fund which actually exceeds the ICO and pre-ICO total coin count. If you can't see the bad mathematics here, there is something wrong here. ATL will not recover from this and will be a dead coin with millions of funds raised. Fuck you....I'm out. And good luck to any of the bandwagonners that decide to stick this through.
Those numbers look beyond terrible...I didn't know it was that bad. What was the responsible smoking when allowing 34.6% of total tokens to go to bounty while investors got 24% ? Is there any precedent of ICO with these %? Are the bounty team family members of whoever took the decision or did someone just have a bad day when calculating this? The funniest now are bountyhunters trying to convince others they're not going to dump in the next 4 months and they all believe firmly in this project... I've never spoken bad of any project apart from scamconnect, but this looks bizarre and no I'm not fudding to buy in cheap..Sold my stack the first day it hit ED and couldn't be happier to get out even with small gains. Sorry for the unknowing late investors like the guy above me and good luck and patience to those who stay, you'll need it.
Of course they will dump, and seeing them saying they won't dump was the final reason I needed to get out. It will be a race to get their coins to the exchanges. Polo will never list this shit. Neither will Trex. It's a securities token.
And not to the organizers of ATLANT, what is the discrepancy of the white paper?
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
Boom. Perfect post.
And this is why I just went ahead and dumped my 2.7 btc worth of ATL (My ico cost) for a 90% loss. I'd rather get something then nothing. Lesson learned. Fucking crooked ass team with their full dev fund (instead of scaling it back with the actual tokens sold), and not scaling back the bounty fund which actually exceeds the ICO and pre-ICO total coin count. If you can't see the bad mathematics here, there is something wrong here. ATL will not recover from this and will be a dead coin with millions of funds raised. Fuck you....I'm out. And good luck to any of the bandwagonners that decide to stick this through.
Those numbers look beyond terrible...I didn't know it was that bad. What was the responsible smoking when allowing 34.6% of total tokens to go to bounty while investors got 24% ? Is there any precedent of ICO with these %? Are the bounty team family members of whoever took the decision or did someone just have a bad day when calculating this? The funniest now are bountyhunters trying to convince others they're not going to dump in the next 4 months and they all believe firmly in this project... I've never spoken bad of any project apart from scamconnect, but this looks bizarre and no I'm not fudding to buy in cheap..Sold my stack the first day it hit ED and couldn't be happier to get out even with small gains. Sorry for the unknowing late investors like the guy above me and good luck and patience to those who stay, you'll need it.
And not to the organizers of ATLANT, what is the discrepancy of the white paper?
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
Boom. Perfect post.
And this is why I just went ahead and dumped my 2.7 btc worth of ATL (My ico cost) for a 90% loss. I'd rather get something then nothing. Lesson learned. Fucking crooked ass team with their full dev fund (instead of scaling it back with the actual tokens sold), and not scaling back the bounty fund which actually exceeds the ICO and pre-ICO total coin count. If you can't see the bad mathematics here, there is something wrong here. ATL will not recover from this and will be a dead coin with millions of funds raised. Fuck you....I'm out. And good luck to any of the bandwagonners that decide to stick this through.
And not to the organizers of ATLANT, what is the discrepancy of the white paper?
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
the total number of ATL tokens was limited to 150,000,000
3.5% pre-sale 5 250 000 ATL
69% ICO 103 500 000 ATL
15% team and consultants 22 500 000
12.5% bounty 18 750 000
Sold in total for real money 13,225,026 ATL out of the possible 108,750,000 (pre-sale and ICO)
that is 12.1% of the possible, 87.9% destroyed
It turned out:
total: 54,175,041 ATL 100%
13,225,026 ATL investors (pre-sale + ICO) 24.4%
22 500 000 ATL team and consultants 41.5%
18 750 000 ATL Bounty 34.6%
The question is: why did not they destroy proportionally 87.9% of the bounty and from the team and consultants?
This is nonsense, when investors received less than the bounty for the pre-award and ICO.
Yes, and most of all this does not correspond to the ratio indicated in the white paper!
Boom. Perfect post.
The translation and moderation campaign has no spreadsheet? It's weird because I did not realize it until now.
Today there is great news about bounty - this Friday the Atlant spreadsheets will be open and will be able to check your rewards.
so tomorrow is the day when the spreadsheet will be open,,
because today i checked the spreadsheet is still locked
anyway thanks for this informations my friend
Until November 24 should is open the spreadsheet, right?
And now they cannot change it legally, the bounty distribution will kill the coin price, 34.6% bounty? Fo real? Its like giving free money to others and just kill the project.
An ICO without make bounty program doesn't guarantee it will increase the value or price of tokens. It depends on the project itself. Atlant as we know, they took seriously to running their platform. I am one of Atlant bounty participants, I will not "destroy" my project.
I dont really know what will happen. Yes, its indeed a big bounty, but due to the low volume (10000-15000$), i dont think that they can sell their bounties. The demand is just too low for such a high bounty.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
it will be the strangest bounty, with such volume I can not even imagine what will happen to the price
yes, many ICO prices fell down after bounty, but there was a small bounty, but it's huge! price, may fall more strongly
I dont really know what will happen. Yes, its indeed a big bounty, but due to the low volume (10000-15000$), i dont think that they can sell their bounties. The demand is just too low for such a high bounty.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
it will be the strangest bounty, with such volume I can not even imagine what will happen to the price
And now they cannot change it legally, the bounty distribution will kill the coin price, 34.6% bounty? Fo real? Its like giving free money to others and just kill the project.
None of us will sell our bounty, there's NOT enough liquidity for that!! Why nobody can understand that? Also we all believe in Atlant project. At least i won't see a single ATL.
And now they cannot change it legally, the bounty distribution will kill the coin price, 34.6% bounty? Fo real? Its like giving free money to others and just kill the project.
Even though it kills Atlanta is long term project and the price will boost once they start singing agreement with many more companies in coming days. Already they have many agreement in place we have to and see how in terms of development.
I dont really know what will happen. Yes, its indeed a big bounty, but due to the low volume (10000-15000$), i dont think that they can sell their bounties. The demand is just too low for such a high bounty.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
Anyways, i would prefer if they would distribute the bounties in several batches.
Yes rite "in several batches", seen that in many Icos, in a 3 or 6 months period. And now they cannot change it legally, the bounty distribution will kill the coin price, 34.6% bounty? Fo real? Its like giving free money to others and just kill the project.
I don't think so. Look at the previous coins with airdrops. Also look at Bitcoin cash, Bitcoin Gold or even Ethereum Classic. They are all basically free coins.
Jump to: