Pages:
Author

Topic: CLOSED..... - page 11. (Read 123134 times)

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 04, 2014, 02:57:32 AM
i can't solomining anymore
i have 100% reject ....

btw,
it was already hard to mine some coins with the low block reward (2qb)
and there will be even harder with pulse Sad

The amount of mining at the suprnova pool has also increased a lot, so the chances are lower. With the fixed low difficulty this might look like a lot of rejects, but f0o (obfuscode) can probably tell you more about it.
hero member
Activity: 707
Merit: 505
October 04, 2014, 02:32:16 AM
price fast approaching 500, at these low price levels small jumps = hughe percentage gains Grin
sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 250
October 03, 2014, 11:34:42 PM
i can't solomining anymore
i have 100% reject ....

btw,
it was already hard to mine some coins with the low block reward (2qb)
and there will be even harder with pulse Sad
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
October 03, 2014, 12:03:20 PM
I don’t think I missed an Update. My wallet will not connect. Last sync'd 3 weeks ago. I know pulse is alive but that wouldn’t make my wallet not connect. Did I miss something?

Thanks. I will leave it open and see if it connects with more time.
 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-587457

perhaps you need to reindex as well

It just connected. Took about 30 mins. But it connected.

it should connect way faster,
examine your conf file, some addnodes may work on old version
and slow down the start significantly


Removing all addnode= entries from the config is also worth a try Smiley
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
October 03, 2014, 10:44:34 AM
I don’t think I missed an Update. My wallet will not connect. Last sync'd 3 weeks ago. I know pulse is alive but that wouldn’t make my wallet not connect. Did I miss something?

Thanks. I will leave it open and see if it connects with more time.
 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-587457

perhaps you need to reindex as well

It just connected. Took about 30 mins. But it connected.

Edit** It just disconnected. I will have to take care of it later. I am heading out of town.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
October 03, 2014, 10:16:14 AM
I don’t think I missed an Update. My wallet will not connect. Last sync'd 3 weeks ago. I know pulse is alive but that wouldn’t make my wallet not connect. Did I miss something?

Thanks. I will leave it open and see if it connects with more time.
 
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 08:49:11 AM
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 08:11:30 AM
It's at 420 satoshi so far, it hit 800 last time, with new algo we should expect at least 1200? Shocked


Would be nice Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 03:14:20 AM
Don't forget to check out our white paper!


legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 03:03:55 AM
http://94.156.218.28:7977/ p2pool is updated now, sorry for the delay.

Thanks! Will update it in the OP!

We have notified the operator of this pool that he still has to get on the right blockchain. We will let you know when it is safe to mine here! Smiley
hero member
Activity: 707
Merit: 505
October 03, 2014, 02:16:54 AM
It's at 420 satoshi so far, it hit 800 last time, with new algo we should expect at least 1200? Shocked
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 01:55:34 AM
Growth accelerating!

After a successful launch of Quarkbar Pulse yesterday, we have grown a lot in value! After 6 weeks of innovation our value increased from 40 to 400! Before the end of the year we want to make that 2000!

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 03, 2014, 01:32:21 AM
http://94.156.218.28:7977/ p2pool is updated now, sorry for the delay.

Thanks! Will update it in the OP!
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 02, 2014, 11:34:50 AM
Value steadily on the rise!

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 02, 2014, 10:56:37 AM
FIRST PULSE BLOCKS!


6.5 hours later and we have reached a 100 blocks! This would have normally happened in 100 minutes, so this is much more efficient!

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
October 02, 2014, 10:31:47 AM
I probably dont understand the concept correctly, but if you want to lower inflation, what is the advantage over just leaving the blocktimes at 30secs and reducing the block rewards?

it's not only about the monetary inflation but also the block-inflation inside the chain.
assuming QB will go until it's end with pulse, that's over 10 years from now on... Look at BTC's blockchain with soon about 40G after only 8 years of operation. Who here likes running their own BTC wallet and having to sync (initially) ~40G?..

With pulse the blockchain size will be much smaller and syncing will be faster because pulse tries to avoid 'empty' blocks.

This explanation is only in regard to the inflation. You can read our whitepaper linked at OP for all details.

Cheers,
f0o


thanks, I missed it in the OP. The link is a bit burried I think. I just took a brief look, interesting, I already know I dont agree on everything. There is probably a discussion somewhere in this thread too, I will read this when I have more time.

This is a community coin, so new input is much appreciated! Seeing you're a hero member, you probably have some well-thought suggestions Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 398
Merit: 250
October 02, 2014, 09:21:03 AM
I probably dont understand the concept correctly, but if you want to lower inflation, what is the advantage over just leaving the blocktimes at 30secs and reducing the block rewards?

it's not only about the monetary inflation but also the block-inflation inside the chain.
assuming QB will go until it's end with pulse, that's over 10 years from now on... Look at BTC's blockchain with soon about 40G after only 8 years of operation. Who here likes running their own BTC wallet and having to sync (initially) ~40G?..

With pulse the blockchain size will be much smaller and syncing will be faster because pulse tries to avoid 'empty' blocks.

This explanation is only in regard to the inflation. You can read our whitepaper linked at OP for all details.

Cheers,
f0o


thanks, I missed it in the OP. The link is a bit burried I think. I just took a brief look, interesting, I already know I dont agree on everything. There is probably a discussion somewhere in this thread too, I will read this when I have more time.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
October 02, 2014, 08:39:56 AM
I probably dont understand the concept correctly, but if you want to lower inflation, what is the advantage over just leaving the blocktimes at 30secs and reducing the block rewards?

it's not only about the monetary inflation but also the block-inflation inside the chain.
assuming QB will go until it's end with pulse, that's over 10 years from now on... Look at BTC's blockchain with soon about 40G after only 8 years of operation. Who here likes running their own BTC wallet and having to sync (initially) ~40G?..

With pulse the blockchain size will be much smaller and syncing will be faster because pulse tries to avoid 'empty' blocks.

This explanation is only in regard to the inflation. You can read our whitepaper linked at OP for all details.

Cheers,
f0o
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
October 02, 2014, 05:37:56 AM
Awesome! Glad to see pulse in operation. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 398
Merit: 250
October 02, 2014, 05:33:34 AM
 I probably dont understand the concept correctly, but if you want to lower inflation, what is the advantage over just leaving the blocktimes at 30secs and reducing the block rewards?
Pages:
Jump to: