All the posts have been counted but the payment will be sent out a bit later since I'm having some connection issues on my DNR wallet laptop.
This has been the busiest round of our campaign so far counting 20 participants!
Supercoiner111 has been excluded for changing his signature.
I'd like to post some examples, there has been 2 accounts that have made 20+ posts each, but I have counted it as 0
These are not constructive posts:https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rubick99-1203154https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gintron-1387886What I consider not to be constructive:- a broad statement in a 15 page thread referrencing nothing that was posted recently
- a few word statement referrrencing the OP which was posted a dozen pages ago
- writing something that has already been said by other people and adding nothing else
- just confirming or agreeing with someone else and writing nothing else (unless your vote is required in the thread)
What I consider constructive:- reading through the thread and making a post with the gathered information without repeating what others have said
- saying a couple of sentences, not only one (not completely necessary, but a positive thing)
Note that, constructive posts are hard to define, but unconstructive are easier.
Focus on contributing and not repeating what others have said, my thoughts are, if you just read through the thread, you'll make a constructive post.
Although I generally like the posts with plenty of text in them, one is able to make a constructive post without many words, check for example
*click*Ofcourse, I'm physically unable to read through the thread of each and single post you guys have made since I'd be reading around a 1000 threads with dozens of pages, but I can spot when someone is spamming, and
I will not allow spammers to tarnish the name of Denarius and myself.
However, I will give Gintron and Rubick99 another chance, they will not receive payment since they failed to post constructive posts and they have by all means been spamming, I might as well report their posts and there's a chance they'd get banned.
You may find this as a
warning, if your next weeks posts aren't diametrically opposed to this weeks,
you WILL be excluded, and won't be allowed back in.
I hope you will take this warning and improve your posting quality, if not you may as well leave now.
heresamemo,d3athgu1s3,ralt have not made enough constructive posts and/or didn't make an ANN post.
R0mi has missed the ANN post, but he has made 7 posts I wouldn't consider as spam, so I have sent him a PM to make that ANN post and he'll receive his payment.
Sine I have written about what I consider a constructive post, I'll also write something about the
Best Round Poster award:In order to qualify for this award, you'll have to make at least 20 posts in the round, after which I will review the quality of your posts and will award the poster with a combination of quality&quantity in promoting our signature.
So far, puwaha has almost always been winning this award as he averages on 40+ constructive posts per round, you can check out some of his posts here
*click for constructive posts*And has already expressed interest in letting someone else win the award for once, but I have always awarded him, since I thought there are 0 posters that qualify for something like this other than him.
So, this round, the qualified [by the 20+ criterion] are puwaha, FacelessCrypto, Janinjo11, Pattart, mornabo, Boriss.
As I can't keep awarding only puwaha, and he doesn't want me to, I will use the process of elimination to pick a winner each week.
Pattart and mornabo have made very "wordy" posts, but they are not something that contributes much, they nearly respond to the last replies on very broad topics.
These are posts that are absolutely worth to be paid for, but are not material for the best round poster award.
Boriss is out because of this:
http://prntscr.com/hz95at which is
completely unsatisfiying.
His other posts are not bad, but this has completely eliminated him for this award.
puwaha doesn't want the award and I'm left with FacelessCrypto and Janinjo11.
Their posts don't seem very bad.
So, this round I'm going to award FacelessCrypto.
Please note, BPR award doesn't represent how you should post.
Thank you very much for transparency.
