Of course it's hard to believe, because it's a blatant lie.
How do you know it's a blatant lie? You assume, but time will pass and this profitability will turn out to be real. What would you do then? Will you regret not believing in this astonishing profitability?
Yes you do. You know perfectly well why you're still a newbie, but if you want me say it loud I'm happy to oblige: You're a shitposting troll. You've been around long enough to know what it takes to build an account, and I'm sure you've done it before. Too bad you squandered that account by scamming people. But that's your MO, isn't it? Squander everything that's ever been given to you and burn all the bridges along the way.
No, you're wrong, I don't know why my account is still in newbie status. Please explain to me! If you call me a troll in front of everyone, then you can find out at least one quote of someone i troll? I first registered on the forum only at the end of 2019 and had never known about this forum before, until I went from the coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin page. You claim that I deceive people, where and whom did I deceive? I have not squandered this account, and you are well aware of this. That all the negative trusts were written by you and others out of malice to get back at me. Do you not repent of this, each time calling me a scammer, although not a single scam has been committed by me so far?
Trust abuse doesn't get tolerated for long around here.
I have never abused anyone's trust. On the contrary, all those who threw a red flag at me abused their authority to accuse me of a non-existent scam
This space doesn't exactly attract lemmings. Most people who get involved in crypto are able to think for themselves. If you had one or two negative feedback, you might be able to make the argument that they're inaccurate, but 8? Come on, man.
So what if I have not 2, but 8 negative trusts, but in terms of content, these 8 negative reviews are equal to one, since they accuse me of non-existent scam
You're lying again. You were asking for a $100 USDC loan, while offering 100 shittokens worth $4 as collateral. You even tried to exchange the $4 worth of shitcoins for $100 worth of other shitcoins. Deception is dishonesty, and you were being deceptive.
It's you again misleading everyone that I offered a collateral equal to $100. Here's how it was -
My post: "I need a loan of $100 for 30 days"
Jawhead999: "I don't think there's a dumb person who want to lend his money for 24 months to earn $9.92, even you're live in poor country, you can earn $9.92 in just a week for working on real life job. More importantly, you don't have any reputation and asking for non collateral loan."
My post: "I have a collateral (100 UST), but no one wants to take it"
Accordingly, it is indicated here that I have 100 UST (US Terra), not equal to 100 USDT. It's like if the dialog was built like this -
Jawhead999: "I don't think there's a dumb person who want to lend his money for 24 months to earn $9.92, even you're live in poor country, you can earn $9.92 in just a week for working on real life job. More importantly, you don't have any reputation and asking for non collateral loan."
My post: "I have a collateral (100 candy wrappers from chewing gum), but no one wants to take it"
And where is the scam? This is the answer to Jawhead999's question
No, the feedback is accurate, it's you who's spreading falsehoods and trolling.
Who am I trolling and where am I spreading falsehoods. Will you show them to everyone?