Pages:
Author

Topic: [Closed] RESULTS are in for Bitcoin Favorites of 2011! - page 2. (Read 7184 times)

sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
I know what OP was trying to do and I truly commend them for it. Unfortunately, as could be expected  with a forum newbie trying to organize an awards ceremony based on historical data that only a veteran user would know from experience, this poll has turned out unimpressive to say the least.

Under normal circumstances I would just troll the OP, push them to correct their mistakes, and offer my assistance privately, but in this special case that the OP has refused to correct course I have decided to step up.

Feel free to continue to participate freely, but let it be known that BitTalk.TV is hosting our own awards ceremony that will be broadcast on BitTalk.TV announcing the winners. We are in no rush to hurry and for this reason we will allow a full two weeks for entries.

Since this particular award thread seems to more focused on giving away bitcoins to anyone willing to participate than actually doing a good job creating a fair contest, we will focus on rewarding individuals the proper way.

To combat cheating, add value to the votes, raise money for charity, and ensure that only serious bitcoiners are participating in the contest as contestants or voters, a microtransaction will to a specified bitcoin address will be necessary. This amount will differ slightly for those nominating themselves.

All finalists of the BitTalk.TV Best of 2011 contest in each category will:

1) be published in the BitTalk.TV magazine's January issue;
2) be broadcast in a special presentation on BitTalk.tv;
3) receive a free year subscription to the BitTalk.TV magazine (est. $30 value)
4) receive a FREE casascius coin in the mail!

The categories will be soft-listed on the official forum thread. Feel free to petition for additional categories if you believe it is appropriate.

Good luck to everyone!



Fair enough and good luck. Wait till you get the first person who nominates themselves who you don't agree with ( or better yet everyone doesn't agree with) such as say Buttcoin.org  or something what are you going to do?  My system allowed people to freely nominate as much as  freely erase who they think shouldn't be nominated and at some put "cut it off" or "last man standing" so to speak.

My poll is about as un-biased as you can get and maybe missed/inaccurate on one or two things but rather have that then being a biased based award system like yours is going to turn out to be . To be clear anyone and ample amount of time  to contacted me prior to listing it up to vote if things weren't accurate. In your poll won't allow that.   Just my 2 cents and like I said good luck! Grin

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
I know what OP was trying to do and I truly commend them for it. Unfortunately, as could be expected  with a forum newbie trying to organize an awards ceremony based on historical data that only a veteran user would know from experience, this poll has turned out unimpressive to say the least.

Under normal circumstances I would just troll the OP, push them to correct their mistakes, and offer my assistance privately, but in this special case that the OP has refused to correct course I have decided to step up.

Feel free to continue to participate freely, but let it be known that BitTalk.TV is hosting our own awards ceremony that will be broadcast on BitTalk.TV announcing the winners. We are in no rush to hurry and for this reason we will allow a full two weeks for entries.

Since this particular award thread seems to more focused on giving away bitcoins to anyone willing to participate than actually doing a good job creating a fair contest, we will focus on rewarding individuals the proper way.

To combat cheating, add value to the votes, raise money for charity, and ensure that only serious bitcoiners are participating in the contest as contestants or voters, a microtransaction will to a specified bitcoin address will be necessary. This amount will differ slightly for those nominating themselves.

All finalists of the BitTalk.TV Best of 2011 contest in each category will:

1) be published in the BitTalk.TV magazine's January issue;
2) be broadcast in a special presentation on BitTalk.tv;
3) receive a free year subscription to the BitTalk.TV magazine (est. $30 value)
4) receive a FREE casascius coin in the mail!

The categories will be soft-listed on the official forum thread. Feel free to petition for additional categories if you believe it is appropriate.

Good luck to everyone!





https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bittalktv-best-of-2011-contest-no-bullshit-56887







sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Nom Nom Nom
Why no love for Mt.Red on the pools award?  : (
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
Yep, I sent .2 from

1HuRS5U9Lg31hmmVUsYJkcPcUgxHY7v6dQ (Instawallet) to
19EMfcpF36uXzQtuDBFaL4dYnqdm5fcMmM.

Hope you get them.

Thanks Alphonso. I see it now for some reason it wasn't showing up on the Donation total strange stuff. Thanks again!
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
Yep, I sent .2 from

1HuRS5U9Lg31hmmVUsYJkcPcUgxHY7v6dQ (Instawallet) to
19EMfcpF36uXzQtuDBFaL4dYnqdm5fcMmM.

Hope you get them.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
bitcoinbetas wins the award for running the most successful scam

I can see why you are 2nd place for worst forum member  Tongue Looks like the only winning around here will be you!
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
Nice idea and the site works well.  Thanks for doing this.  I just sent a wee bit to the fund.

Thanks and you're welcome. If you did send some bitcents lemme know I didn't see it arrive.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
bitcoinbetas wins the award for running the most successful scam
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
Nice idea and the site works well.  Thanks for doing this.  I just sent a wee bit to the fund.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
Astana has been removed from the list of Worst Forum Member of the Year, I remember to see him on the list.

I believe Astana was moved in and out a couple of times.

Also a mid-week [bump]  the votes are close ! so keep voting!
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
The future begins today
Astana has been removed from the list of Worst Forum Member of the Year, I remember to see him on the list.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
I never said I was a perfect Moderator ? and I never said I wasn't moderating it ?  I just have no say in what should be included and what shouldn't its not up to me it was up to you all. On obvious things I did my best.
Leaving out the most popular pools, high profile developers, etc while including dead pools, etc, is not moderation. If you made a decision to do so, it's basically trolling. If you didn't make a decision (I think you mentioned you just took it as-is at some point), it's unmoderated.

First, I'm not going to be able to get every developer ( wasn't up to me duh its called "nominees" for a reason) and obviously not everyone put those in so of course someone is going to get left out and your going to complain about it right ? Secondly, my moderation was only the obvious ( Grant it I don't know much about pools ) I wasn't going to "research" every entry and sure as hell wasn't going to ask everyone again what is right in wrong since its all subjective anyways. Also, like I said this isn't a scientific poll even if I did include a dead poll who cares I wanted as much humor in it as possible also if that is trolling then don't vote!  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
I never said I was a perfect Moderator ? and I never said I wasn't moderating it ?  I just have no say in what should be included and what shouldn't its not up to me it was up to you all. On obvious things I did my best.
Leaving out the most popular pools, high profile developers, etc while including dead pools, etc, is not moderation. If you made a decision to do so, it's basically trolling. If you didn't make a decision (I think you mentioned you just took it as-is at some point), it's unmoderated.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
edit: Keep in mind its a double edge sword if "locked it down" with  who I thought should be there  someone surely would complain regardless or let everyone at least have a chance to put in who they think ( whether accurate or not)  I would be damned either way so I went with one of the lesser of two evil's and stuck with a transparent method.
Saying you're doing one thing (moderating it) while doing the opposite (not moderating it) is NOT transparent.

I never said I was a perfect Moderator ? and I never said I wasn't moderating it ?  I just have no say in what should be included and what shouldn't its not up to me it was up to you all. On obvious things I did my best.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
edit: Keep in mind its a double edge sword if "locked it down" with  who I thought should be there  someone surely would complain regardless or let everyone at least have a chance to put in who they think ( whether accurate or not)  I would be damned either way so I went with one of the lesser of two evil's and stuck with a transparent method.
Saying you're doing one thing (moderating it) while doing the opposite (not moderating it) is NOT transparent.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1272
Merit: 1012
howdy
LOL awesome poll. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
I never threw anything out I went with the latest revision I had wrong or right I went with what I had. You had ample time to correct it or PM me to correct my contact information was everywhere.
I tried. You merely reassured me that you had it under control and not to worry about it:
This spreadsheet needs some moderation. Too many vandals.

Don't worry I got back up copies and I'm doing some moderation.
back-ups = revisions tracking that google docs has and once in awhile I saved a copy but every time I went back people have erased to many things I had to go with some something.

edit: Keep in mind its a double edge sword if "locked it down" with  who I thought should be there  someone surely would complain regardless or let everyone at least have a chance to put in who they think ( whether accurate or not)  I would be damned either way so I went with one of the lesser of two evil's and stuck with a transparent method.
Pages:
Jump to: