I'd like to be reviewed for the campaign, please.
Bitcoin Address: 1itod1vPdh4rCtaJiewNQjd4JnfZw7ZTN
Current Post Count: 1851
Current Rank: Hero
Thanks.
Accepted. Let me know when you change signatures and I'll add you to the list of participants.
I think you should consider the re-registering. You would be able to hold all the good writers in your campaign and wont lose them because they were too late. You could consistently better the quality of the posts this way instead randomly getting new people inside. I think that would lead to a better quality campaign. Thats a point i dont like with this campaign since it brings in insecurity. You wouldnt know if you wouldnt need to find a new campaign after the timeframe is over. You only would need a bit too slow and you would need to remember this all the time. I think many good writers dont like to bother with things like that. They only want to write and when they could get paid by the way then its a bonus.
Only my thoughts...
Fair points, and I appreciate your feedback, but I think the current rules are fair for participants as is. I post here when I send a payment out, and users can always look at the spreadsheet to see when their payments are due. (I consistently send payments out at exactly midnight the day they're due, Bitcointalk time, which is GMT time) If they know they'll be gone that day, they can let me know a day or two in advance via PM and I'll register them for another month.
However, if for some reason they aren't able to let me know within 24 hours after payment being sent, or before the payment is sent, chances are their slot won't have been filled if they re-register two or three days after their payment has been sent.
Most monthly campaigns seem to follow similar rules to this, as well as past monthly campaigns too, and it seems to have worked out fairly well for those campaigns.
