Devs, you have done a good job so far.
Sure you need to change POA, but I believe that you can make a good algorithm.
I know you are "long race" and that it's important for me.
Good luck!
Topic: Closed Thread - page 99. (Read 677703 times)
Im 80% sure Starik69 is TaunSew.
I'm 99% sure its TauntStewy.
Devs stay anon and expect to run a real world bank? Wtf
YES, Like Bernie Madoff!
What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit?pli=1
Difficult for me to imagine a deal with a bank
The dev's are anon
It's not like Bitshares Stellar or Ripple with big names
So NODEpay will not launch in 20th February?
Devs stay anon and expect to run a real world bank? Wtf
What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit?pli=1
Difficult for me to imagine a deal with a bank
The dev's are anon
It's not like Bitshares Stellar or Ripple with big names
Big Names? Lol... Mt.Gox and Mark Karpeles are big names also. Dev's already said if someone needed they could be enterviewed by btt member on skype and Nodepay is already registered.
What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit?pli=1
Difficult for me to imagine a deal with a bank
The dev's are anon
It's not like Bitshares Stellar or Ripple with big names
Im 80% sure Starik69 is TaunSew.
Could you please stop quoting starik69 guys? I put him in ignore list long ago and don't want to read his poops here. Thank you in advance.
Crypti had the same scalability problems. 
This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method
This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method
Nxt also took months of real tests to start working "transparent forging" decently
Crypti had the same scalability problems.
This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method
This makes me think that both devs have no math/networking background and code their fantasies by trial and error method
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA... We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life
How many participants were there in the test ? 2.4.5 maximum of 8. When few participants POA works perfect, when we released our clients the day before yesterday, in the beginning no problems. The community does not help us in testing test no, but in a real network without problems
We are working on POA, we already know where the error occurs, the following releases POA will be improved
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
First Crypti with their failed POT, now Node with failing POA... We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
Something wrong with the devs and their brilliant algorithms when they face real life
How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
There are errors in forging POA. we now monitor these days turn on blockexplorer
We have noticed that the more peers. The more complex the algorithm POA to choose peer and fails, too many options, We will rewrite POA
How come 12718762868981431936 account forging so often? I see 44 peers at least 30 of them are active. And system can't pick up forger and choose dev's account?
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
And when will you include blockexplorer back to client? This is ridiculous.
Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js?
Thus this node is forging?
Thus this node is forging?
Go to your ip:19775, login there and close page without logging out.
clientConfig.js is not working in this version it been asked about many times.
Why my node is not as If the wallet was open, since I put the passphrase in clientConfig.js?
Thus this node is forging?
Thus this node is forging?
my node shows since a day in the node-client under "peers" only "check", what does it mean? (linux)
also i made a "lib" directory where i copied the .conf file, because the folder was not there.
also i made a "lib" directory where i copied the .conf file, because the folder was not there.
What a disappointing mess in launching new client
What is the problem? The windows client, just take 2 clicks.
But 2 fast clicks in a row is exhausting..
cAN always change it to 1 click.
What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zDlGZn7sICIA8bUPhe6jPPzGOxA4YgTgi6J4XilFpgs/edit?pli=1
What is the big deal with Nodepay?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
We can purchase a credit card and pay with node coins?
There is a Slack group or not?
Jump to: