That activity did not go unnoticed. Not everything gets or needs to be reported on.
As for willingness to give out large loans, you don't see the full picture, and default is considered.
Patrick - Starfish BCB
Topic: [Closed]Looking for 1 more loan 8.5 bitcoin - page 2. (Read 4130 times)
He owes me 17.5+x BTC, he replied twice to my PMs, claiming he's trying to gain funds...
Another thing that bothered me (that went virtually unquestioned) was the fact that he posted on more than 1 occasion, that FUND WERE SENT yet no one received anything and when he was questioned about it once, he simply said he 'messed up'......WTFWhere did those 'messed up' funds go ? who were they sent to ?
This guy seems like nothing more than a lying piece of shit, simply looking to buy time, so the fact that he responded to a couple PM's hopefully doesn't get your hopes up.
I think this guy is gone.....as he's way too deep into it to begin selling everything he has listed for sale, in order to pay people back.
Alternatively, if he does end up selling some items, I can perhaps see some of the loans being repaid, but potential buyers run the risk of never receiving anything for their BTC sent for his goods currently for sale.
This looks like it's going to be a partial win/lose situation no matter what.
He owes me 17.5+x BTC, he replied twice to my PMs, claiming he's trying to gain funds...
So, after 104 BTC in defaulted loans, has this guy pretty much disappeared ? (well, 104 as the borrowed amount, perhaps closer to 125 as the repayment amount ?)
From what I had read, he essentially started out with a couple small loans, then shopped around, using those successful loans (not even repaid) to use as part of his 'credentials' in order to seek larger loans ?
He still seems to be actively browsing the forum, although silent....
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kujoking7-46446
So, basically, his signature is bullshit then ? as his references are received loans...not necessarily REPAID loans ?
It's sad that people like this exist.....
From what I had read, he essentially started out with a couple small loans, then shopped around, using those successful loans (not even repaid) to use as part of his 'credentials' in order to seek larger loans ?
He still seems to be actively browsing the forum, although silent....
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kujoking7-46446
Quote
Name: kujoking7
Last Active: January 25, 2012, 11:41:06 PM
Last Active: January 25, 2012, 11:41:06 PM
So, basically, his signature is bullshit then ? as his references are received loans...not necessarily REPAID loans ?
Quote
Signature:
Sold to: Orbit45244
Bought from: 72289
Borrowed from: TheHarbinger, SilverLeaf, slider1978, ineededausername
Sold to: Orbit45244
Bought from: 72289
Borrowed from: TheHarbinger, SilverLeaf, slider1978, ineededausername
It's sad that people like this exist.....
Yes, I believe that kujoking7 should mark all five threads as "OVERDUE" or at least "OPEN", not closed unless they are.
Updated information collected from all five threads:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
Code:
SilverLeaf 15.50 17.5 21st 1rEPaYbh2hHLak54cBeS8Li8v374EbaeV
TheHarbinger 8.50 10.75 (11.9) 20th 1JybK4JDGsKcuSbppNBH2mzd5dDyYnxGNp
PatrickHarnett 28.00 28+20% 30th ?
ineededausername 40.00 ? ? ?
slider1978 12.75 14.75 21st 1LRWsqp3aVrTnpqSSWU71FagrbzNsSdxDd
------------------------
TOTAL 104.75
TheHarbinger 8.50 10.75 (11.9) 20th 1JybK4JDGsKcuSbppNBH2mzd5dDyYnxGNp
PatrickHarnett 28.00 28+20% 30th ?
ineededausername 40.00 ? ? ?
slider1978 12.75 14.75 21st 1LRWsqp3aVrTnpqSSWU71FagrbzNsSdxDd
------------------------
TOTAL 104.75
Yes, I believe that kujoking7 should mark all five threads as "OVERDUE" or at least "OPEN", not closed unless they are.
Updated information collected from all five threads:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
Code:
SilverLeaf 15.50 17.5 21st 1rEPaYbh2hHLak54cBeS8Li8v374EbaeV
TheHarbinger 8.50 10.75 (11.9) 20th 1JybK4JDGsKcuSbppNBH2mzd5dDyYnxGNp
PatrickHarnett 28.00 28+20% 30th ?
ineededausername 40.00 ? ? ?
slider1978 12.75 14.75 21st 1LRWsqp3aVrTnpqSSWU71FagrbzNsSdxDd
------------------------
TOTAL 104.75
TheHarbinger 8.50 10.75 (11.9) 20th 1JybK4JDGsKcuSbppNBH2mzd5dDyYnxGNp
PatrickHarnett 28.00 28+20% 30th ?
ineededausername 40.00 ? ? ?
slider1978 12.75 14.75 21st 1LRWsqp3aVrTnpqSSWU71FagrbzNsSdxDd
------------------------
TOTAL 104.75
I put all I could gather from the various threads into the consolidated loan box above. You can quote it and add the missing information if you wish. I think the total is the main thing and I think that is correct.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
I agree it is very fascinating, and I have to say that for better or worse I'm glad to be a part of it. I think there are some great things to come and I think we are going to look back on this time with fondness. There is a historical society in the building I work in and I was down helping them with their computer systems the other day and they were showing me old documents from a bank in town that I used to work for. Some of the docs were old deposit and loan lists that the bank kept regarding customers. Really reminded me of the google doc that was started here. Back in the day will be a common phrase for some of us in the future I think
I put all I could gather from the various threads into the consolidated loan box above. You can quote it and add the missing information if you wish. I think the total is the main thing and I think that is correct.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
Starfish Bank
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
Watching the Bitcoin economy in general grow out of its infancy is very interesting... you sort of think, "hey, there's that real-world system being duplicated/adapted to bitcoin," and it's somewhat exciting to watch a free parallel economy excel at the same things that are done with fiat.
I put all I could gather from the various threads into the consolidated loan box above. You can quote it and add the missing information if you wish. I think the total is the main thing and I think that is correct.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
I do not know why, but I find this whole BTC loaning thing very fascinating. It is a study in human beings and behavior and how they deal (or don't deal) with money.
I guess the question we are asking here is: can a new system for loaning money to pseudo-anonymous people be developed.
We have banks developing, and even a credit rating system on the way. Seems to me, for better or worse, we are having to duplicate a lot of the same infrastructure that has been developed in the fiat lending industry.
Then seeing INAU putting in some extra killed that idea, and now we have an interesting set of threads.
ugh why did I do that. facepalm
Hi BurtWagner. You might also like to add that the loan due date is 1 feb. I had also headed my PM as loaning 28 and repaying 35, but (of course) 20% would only take it to 33.6.
The thing that annoyed me was checking the loan history and seeing the claims of payment and my 28 coins were simply not being used to cover those payment. Then seeing INAU putting in some extra killed that idea, and now we have an interesting set of threads.
The thing that annoyed me was checking the loan history and seeing the claims of payment and my 28 coins were simply not being used to cover those payment. Then seeing INAU putting in some extra killed that idea, and now we have an interesting set of threads.
maybe its "closed" as in no more looking for loan, filled ?
Yes, I believe that kujoking7 should mark all five threads as "OVERDUE" or at least "OPEN", not closed unless they are.
Updated information collected from all five threads:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed155-bitcoin-loan-175-btc-by-friday-jan-20th-58735
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-need-1-more-loan-1275-bitcoins-58878
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedlooking-for-1-more-loan-85-bitcoin-60166
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/found-looking-for-28-bitcoin-loan-60453
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closedfinal-loan-18-bit-coins-60469
Code:
SilverLeaf 15.50 17.5 21st 1rEPaYbh2hHLak54cBeS8Li8v374EbaeV
TheHarbinger 8.50 10.75 (11.9) 20th 1JybK4JDGsKcuSbppNBH2mzd5dDyYnxGNp
PatrickHarnett 28.00 28+20% 30th ?
ineededausername 40.00 ? ? ?
slider1978 12.75 14.75 21st 1LRWsqp3aVrTnpqSSWU71FagrbzNsSdxDd
------------------------
TOTAL 104.75
The fact that this thread is marked closed causes me great concern. 
Pay is coming
Hey kujoking7 are you going to pay these guys or do you plan to fuck them over ? Why the hell do u make false claims about payments that never went out ? I hope you sleep well at night...
Bumpitty bump bump bump...
Looks like he just put up a bunch of his stuff for sale. He may be trying to raise funds to pay you guyes off:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kujoking7-46446
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kujoking7-46446
I loaned 15.5 BTC to kujoking7, he's claiming repayment but none received. Following the issue closely.
Jump to: