Acting like that's a consistent number is deceptive. How about you post what you've mined in the last 30 days mining straight LTC? 7 days?
It's not deceptive when I stated "over the last 24 hours".
2016-01-15 16:52:01 0.94014821
2016-01-15 16:47:29 0.94424726
2016-01-15 15:37:16 0.96655597
2016-01-15 14:16:36 1.00270547
2016-01-15 13:16:03 0.98485691
2016-01-15 13:11:33 1.00144123
2016-01-15 11:51:58 1.03413524
2016-01-15 10:41:49 1.06330011
2016-01-15 10:08:22 1.0739877
2016-01-15 09:21:10 1.04084467
2016-01-15 09:19:35 1.04088614
2016-01-15 08:09:23 1.06683155
2016-01-15 08:05:52 1.08321782
2016-01-15 07:50:44 1.07357828
2016-01-15 07:48:26 1.08284067
2016-01-15 07:40:56 1.07402595
2016-01-15 06:12:14 1.06789618
2016-01-15 04:48:55 1.06564909
2016-01-15 02:04:17 1.03762004
2016-01-15 01:31:09 1.02162135
2016-01-15 00:36:08 1.04374732
2016-01-15 00:00:42 1.04150719
2016-01-14 23:51:17 1.04171219
2016-01-14 23:39:28 1.04428281
2016-01-14 22:46:16 1.03227657
2016-01-14 21:55:15 1.04169582
2016-01-14 18:02:05 1.06134439
2016-01-14 17:40:26 1.04949398
2016-01-14 17:09:37 1.02479257
2016-01-14 17:04:57 1.01613143
2016-01-14 16:52:04 1.00617923
2016-01-14 15:03:54 1.04311203
2016-01-14 14:51:11 1.04383042
2016-01-14 14:44:46 1.06109128
2016-01-14 13:37:28 1.03802968
2016-01-14 12:00:06 1.07784461
2016-01-14 11:28:28 1.06380723
2016-01-14 10:50:38 1.10848176
2016-01-14 10:35:37 1.08450193
2016-01-14 09:15:11 1.07442487
2016-01-14 09:10:55 1.08787442
2016-01-14 08:25:38 1.0815501
2016-01-14 08:11:41 1.09195458
2016-01-14 08:02:02 1.09560518
2016-01-14 06:43:28 1.10007552
2016-01-14 05:58:03 1.10469599
2016-01-14 05:47:32 1.1155524
2016-01-14 05:25:59 1.14471661
2016-01-14 04:44:12 1.16353356
2016-01-14 03:21:21 1.14088969
2016-01-14 03:13:38 1.15755184
2016-01-14 02:26:11 1.15388119
2016-01-13 22:35:36 1.12537992
2016-01-13 19:14:49 0.9598109
2016-01-13 13:24:36 0.96326292
2016-01-13 12:58:21 0.95662934
2016-01-13 11:04:26 0.92486959
2016-01-13 10:06:51 0.91222918
2016-01-13 09:19:57 0.94764741
2016-01-13 06:59:10 1.07099176
2016-01-13 06:32:58 1.06647462
2016-01-13 06:25:40 1.07349707
2016-01-13 06:14:21 1.0735337
2016-01-13 05:14:39 1.08454789
2016-01-13 05:11:02 1.10711777
2016-01-13 05:04:46 1.10971941
2016-01-13 03:27:28 1.13357004
2016-01-13 02:37:13 1.17171394
2016-01-13 02:16:54 1.15010521
2016-01-13 02:14:45 1.17887034
2016-01-13 02:08:16 1.14564313
2016-01-12 23:19:06 1.15329981
2016-01-12 23:11:26 1.17427745
2016-01-12 20:43:53 1.07703347
2016-01-12 20:01:01 1.07974413
2016-01-12 18:41:20 1.06678467
2016-01-12 18:24:55 1.06859612
2016-01-12 18:21:25 1.07787961
2016-01-12 17:00:12 1.08477909
2016-01-12 16:58:40 1.08593952
2016-01-12 15:11:57 1.09058511
2016-01-12 14:38:37 1.08847592
2016-01-12 13:36:45 1.05297228
2016-01-12 11:06:45 1.05219636
2016-01-12 11:02:26 1.06106762
2016-01-12 09:45:42 1.10338558
2016-01-12 08:17:16 1.07677188
2016-01-12 08:02:55 1.07168161
2016-01-12 06:54:30 1.07741858
2016-01-12 06:05:10 1.06059637
2016-01-12 04:40:22 1.06784553
2016-01-12 04:34:18 1.07646406
2016-01-12 04:24:38 1.0633537
2016-01-12 02:48:56 1.0437499
2016-01-12 02:11:01 1.02116234
2016-01-12 00:49:31 0.9974838
2016-01-11 23:15:49 0.77187144
2016-01-11 22:54:40 0.69355154
2016-01-11 22:13:46 0.52715498
You can see some down time, but totals 104LTC, which is consistent with the calculations of 2.5GH/s. But it's whatever, I'm done. I laughed, I cried, it was better than Jersey Boys. I'll let mindtrip call the shots from here on out.
2) if the profit potential is so great and you feel that LTC will only go higher, why not find another location to lease and keep mining 30-34 LTCs a day?
You got it! My recommendation to him is have interested miners try to find another way to procure 2.5GH/s (as those A4's we'll be here any day now) and we run these bitches into the ground as Bitcoin continues its identity crises through the halving.
Peace.