Get 3 hours more 
may be have got holiday didnt answers
Topic: Cloudhashers - custom mining contracts starting from 0.01 BTC - page 3. (Read 10409 times)
may be have got holiday didnt answers
Scam - Scam
they....the prison...
they....the prison...
My god..
get one hours again.
Maybe network very low to confirm bitcoin.
get one hours again.
Maybe network very low to confirm bitcoin.
we living by embarrassing
to evry timewe should know we lost our invested
Scam - Scam
they....the prison...
they....the prison...
Scam - Scam
they....the prison...
they....the prison...
Scam - Scam
they....the prison...
they....the prison...
omg, a watermark? why don't you, just write: "CLOUDHASHERS.NET - 05 JUL 2014" on piece of paper and put it on miners to be visible on picture?
Well I'll do that tomorrow, out of the office already. It is watermarked just in case.Watermark? Just in case what exactly?? Wawaminer should have watermarked it first so you couldn't steal it, you mean?
Oh, about this "out of the office already..." what a j0ke. You don't have an office farm boy. You just got right on that photoshop, didn't you? AND did one heck of a lousy job of it!
wawaminer.com huh?
...we are all gonna be crying "wawa" all the way home...
...we are all gonna be crying "wawa" all the way home...
Well the mining hardware on the pictures still looks exactly like the 200 GHS Asic SHA256 Miner from Wawaminer.com. 
Is there a magic trick that they can mine scrypt coins?!
Ah, and Wawaminer doesn't build any scrypt miner at the moment or did that in the past.
Is there a magic trick that they can mine scrypt coins?!
Ah, and Wawaminer doesn't build any scrypt miner at the moment or did that in the past.
Cloudhasher!!
frankly to said!!! when stop paying your site ? just i know how many days i have time to receiving !!!
frankly to said!!! when stop paying your site ? just i know how many days i have time to receiving !!!
As promised https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Br4LaCiCUAAeWCV.jpg
A truly great PHOTOSHOP of the original photo. Everybody, compare it for yourselves and see...
Frightening.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BryuECvCUAAlxt-.jpg:large
It's the same photo!
Wouldn't you think if this was legit, that after making the sign, you'd want to take a straight on shot, not angled? But basically this is the same photo as before...
I believe the photoshop'd "cloudhashers.net" photo is way darker than the original because cloudhashers had problems putting in a realistic reflection of the words "cloudhashers.net" and gave up ---and made the photo darker to cover up his ineptitude and the lack of a reflection. The original photo has very nice natural reflections in the area of the subsequent photoshop'd cloudhashers.net sign.
So dear "investors", how do you feel now?
I feeling lost my ivesting
Oh Cloudhashers, you're not even trying. Perspective on the 'sign' is all wrong, even if it wasn't the exact same photo, as pointed out by sillywhim.
As promised 
A truly great PHOTOSHOP of the original photo. Everybody, compare it for yourselves and see...
Frightening.
It's the same photo!
Wouldn't you think if this was legit, that after making the sign, you'd want to take a straight on shot, not angled? But basically this is the same photo as before...
I believe the photoshop'd "cloudhashers.net" photo is way darker than the original because cloudhashers had problems putting in a realistic reflection of the words "cloudhashers.net" and gave up ---and made the photo darker to cover up his ineptitude and the lack of a reflection. The original photo has very nice natural reflections in the area of the subsequent photoshop'd cloudhashers.net sign.
So dear "investors", how do you feel now?
Blockchain.info is the most appropriate for small deposits.
No it isn't you stupid people.
Everyone needs to do the "CEX shuffle dance".
Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee 
so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
...and it is pretty bothersome cloudhashers initially did not understand this (I still think they really don't even now).
What kind of confidence does this give you the customer?
It is too late for existing payouts. Not worth "spending" it at all.
What you can do though is like I outlined in past posts and go the way of CEX and let cloudhashers change the payout to what your bitcoin address is at CEX.
And then setup your Armory bitcoin address as the sweep bitcoin address at CEX and CEX will send out the multitude of transactions into ONE DAILY transaction and NO FEES to your Armory bitcoin address.
Cloudhashers has offered to create a once a day payout. Dunno exactly what they are waiting for.
As promised
Blockchain.info is the most appropriate for small deposits.
Cloudhashers.net, you still DO NOT UNDERSTAND
....
So, what does my desktop wallet software (bitcoin-qt) do automatically? Bitcoin-QT wallet will send out 2000 transactions of 0.0025 BTC each (2000 x 0.0025 BTC = 0.5 BTC). So now Bitcoin-QT wallet has the 0.5 BTC to send, but what do you know.... Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC FEE for each 1K in the transaction. Assuming here each transaction is 500 bytes, so for 2000 transactions, that's 1000K bytes. Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC x 1000 = 0.1 BTC FEE.
...
Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee
so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
Great explanation! thanks a lot.
finally it's clear what you meant with fees. Guys don't use wallets which charge you for incoming transactions. Just don't use them. it is crazy.
finally it's clear what you meant with fees. Guys don't use wallets which charge you for incoming transactions. Just don't use them. it is crazy.
Cloudhashers.net, you still DO NOT UNDERSTAND
....
So, what does my desktop wallet software (bitcoin-qt) do automatically? Bitcoin-QT wallet will send out 2000 transactions of 0.0025 BTC each (2000 x 0.0025 BTC = 0.5 BTC). So now Bitcoin-QT wallet has the 0.5 BTC to send, but what do you know.... Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC FEE for each 1K in the transaction. Assuming here each transaction is 500 bytes, so for 2000 transactions, that's 1000K bytes. Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC x 1000 = 0.1 BTC FEE.
...
Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee
so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
Great explanation! thanks a lot.
finally it's clear what you meant with fees. Guys don't use wallets which charge you for incoming transactions. Just don't use them. it is crazy.
finally it's clear what you meant with fees. Guys don't use wallets which charge you for incoming transactions. Just don't use them. it is crazy.
Cloudhashers.net, you still DO NOT UNDERSTAND
....
So, what does my desktop wallet software (bitcoin-qt) do automatically? Bitcoin-QT wallet will send out 2000 transactions of 0.0025 BTC each (2000 x 0.0025 BTC = 0.5 BTC). So now Bitcoin-QT wallet has the 0.5 BTC to send, but what do you know.... Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC FEE for each 1K in the transaction. Assuming here each transaction is 500 bytes, so for 2000 transactions, that's 1000K bytes. Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC x 1000 = 0.1 BTC FEE.
...
Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee
so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
10 days, payout full and continue
I hope that you keep this for 32 days more, i'll deposit more.
Thanks for hourly payout by admin.
I was restless
I hope that you keep this for 32 days more, i'll deposit more.
Thanks for hourly payout by admin.
I was restless
omg, a watermark? why don't you, just write: "CLOUDHASHERS.NET - 05 JUL 2014" on piece of paper and put it on miners to be visible on picture?
That can still be faked though. You need to do something unique, like put shoe on equipment. Jump to: