You should also keep a copy of the launch source and update it against releases if you want to really look into it. By that I mean look at gits that are wiped clean or moved from the initial launch. Dig and you will find
Topic: Code reviews for altcoins - page 2. (Read 2127 times)
Cool. What you really should do is drop the git release repository against say the LTC or BTC source and analyse the differences.
You should also keep a copy of the launch source and update it against releases if you want to really look into it. By that I mean look at gits that are wiped clean or moved from the initial launch. Dig and you will find
You should also keep a copy of the launch source and update it against releases if you want to really look into it. By that I mean look at gits that are wiped clean or moved from the initial launch. Dig and you will find
seems like a decent service well done - will check it out .
Hello,
I just wanted to alert people to some stuff I've been doing for a while, but just now is being made public. I code review coins. Some of the reviews are requested, some I do on my own.
For reference, I only analyze the source code, it matching the ANN, and sometimes the blockchain with a local or remote block explorer. I do not analyze binary wallets, nor try to evaluate how trust worthy a developer is (though I sometimes point out when a developer is especially good or bad)
You can see my listing of reviews on Github.
Note, all of the reviews are best effort and not at all guaranteed to be exploit free. I only try to find the more obvious exploits.
My old thread was moved to the marketplace and is here. I'm not trying to really sell this as a service, and would like continual discussion around my reviews (think I am wrong about something? Tell me!) and generally I am looking to ensure coins with critical bugs or exploits are called out on it.
I just wanted to alert people to some stuff I've been doing for a while, but just now is being made public. I code review coins. Some of the reviews are requested, some I do on my own.
For reference, I only analyze the source code, it matching the ANN, and sometimes the blockchain with a local or remote block explorer. I do not analyze binary wallets, nor try to evaluate how trust worthy a developer is (though I sometimes point out when a developer is especially good or bad)
You can see my listing of reviews on Github.
Note, all of the reviews are best effort and not at all guaranteed to be exploit free. I only try to find the more obvious exploits.
My old thread was moved to the marketplace and is here. I'm not trying to really sell this as a service, and would like continual discussion around my reviews (think I am wrong about something? Tell me!) and generally I am looking to ensure coins with critical bugs or exploits are called out on it.
Jump to: