Topic: Coin merger? - page 3. (Read 548 times)
I see this feasible with tokens but not coins running on different blockchain. But in this space where everyone wants to be a CEO and have access to all funds, it's going to be difficult to see such from crypto projects anytime soon.
Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?
Merging coins dont make free new money. So scam coin artists are not interested in zero sum games.
maybe the merger looks good, but the problem is whether good coins want to mess with other coins? or do you prefer to work independently?
because in reality, each project has its own way of thinking,
for example, BCH, which after the fork then becomes two parts, BCHABC and BCHSV, this indicates that each team in the project has its own individual features that should be together.
because in reality, each project has its own way of thinking,
for example, BCH, which after the fork then becomes two parts, BCHABC and BCHSV, this indicates that each team in the project has its own individual features that should be together.
Different people different technologies many other issues can arise from such mergers I think best idea is another team comes up with a better merger to join those coins with the creation of their own which still create rampant number of those coin Best idea is to go with what you have at hand
If they can successfully merge and increase their effectiveness then am sure they will be up to a great start but the issue will have to do with their administrative and also their blockchain and tech types forks can run but how well supported is it perceived is it by the public
Greed does not let it. If there was already a system, would there be so much crypto? Imagine, if the projects related to the same sector combine their power, it will be a much more robust market.
Well most of this coins are just cloned from the old and good coins, and even if they make 2 coin to be only 1 is not ok and even is not possible, because is clear one coin will die and not used anymore, and also they can't succeed because they are just clones as i say.
I'm not very sure on what exactly will happen about this merging. But I have witnessed those coins that replaced their names, forks and other changes so I think not that much difference if there will be two good coins that decided to merge as one. I cannot say about the win-win situation but since most of the altcoins has similarity in terms of usage as a payment to any service and products, I can say that if this will ever happen then the number of altcoins in the market would reduce perfectly and this can be another trending thing with crypto.
Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?
Jump to: