Topic: Coinbase announcement on Monday - page 2. (Read 5718 times)

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: brg444 on January 26, 2015, 08:01:21 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

A choice of what, exactly?

Different brands, different cultures.

Money is not a trend, a brand, a culture or a fad.

You cannot slap shiny painting on it, claim it "appeals" to some people and that it makes it relevant or worthy of existing.

All of you "shibes" are going to be very sorry when you're left holding this trendy bag of worthless coins.

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 07:57:10 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 07:57:10 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

A choice of what, exactly?

Different brands, different cultures.

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

A choice of what, exactly?

Different brands, different cultures.

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

A choice of what, exactly?

Different brands, different cultures.

Ibian

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1278

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: CoinCidental on January 26, 2015, 06:49:37 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

A choice of what, exactly?

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

If you have about 3 major coins it gives people a choice. I agree that having hundreds of coins is too much.

In the case of Dogecoin it attracts different demographics and has more users than all altcoins combined.

If you want to learn more about Dogecoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=800004.0;all

Wink

CoinCidental

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1000

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

alts should be traded for btc now and discontinued /
1 international currency is the ultimate goal and btc is where the big money and development is
alts are just a distraction to new comers who will take long enough to get a basic understanding of btc without having 600 other shitcoins being pumped at the same time

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: testerman on January 25, 2015, 10:54:24 PM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

Will be nice to have altss on there as well. We need a proper regulated legal exchange for alts too.

Yes. I love Dogecoin, and I think it can bring a lot more users to crypto.

It is good to have a choice.

CoinCidental

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1000

Si vis pacem, para bellum

to the moon,

to the sun ,

to the andromeda,

to the universe!!

to the mars ........moon too near .....

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

Quote from: criptix on January 26, 2015, 05:54:38 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Quote from: dataispower on January 26, 2015, 05:34:38 AM

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

yup most likely, would also align with the leaded pics of doge and ltc on coinbase

Interesting. We shall see then.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Well, Coinbase announced their API. It's straightforward REST/JSON. There's a discussion on Hacker News. They're running on Amazon AWS, in the US East zone. They recommend that trading 'bots also run on AWS in that zone for reduced latency. Initially, there will be no fees, but later, fees will be imposed for transactions which "reduce liquidity" (i.e. are executed immediately). Putting up walls is free.

It looks like they're setting themselves up for high frequency trading. They may have huge volume, but it will be the same money going round and round.

They claim to be "licensed" in at least New York and California, but they're not on the money transmitter lists for either state.

Any opinion on this?

https://docs.exchange.coinbase.com/#currencies

Will they add alts?

yup most likely, would also align with the leaked pics of doge and ltc on coinbase

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289