in short. the website is called "coin" desk, not "bit" desk.
so its not limited to bitcoins. and can talk abot altcoins too.
i personally hate coindesks lack of independant research and investigations as the copy and paste articles normally lack evidence or have mis-interpretations of the source.
that said, i feel coindesk is like the financial times (as an analogy only) where the OP is analogically asking why the financial times mentions the pound or yen or visa rather than just talking about dollars
That's right.But mostly coindesk writes about Blockchains, private, permissioned, without any token etc.
These are often articles about distributed databases and how horny banks and other institutions are about that.
I would be happy if they would write some article about one or the other altcoin, what barely to never happens except uncovered scams.
So imo OP is definitely having a point here.
On the other hand coindesk is a company which wants to make money and therefore everything related to crypto and "Blockchain" is fine for them to get published which I can fully understand.
Right but they are presenting the things like : X bank is running a blockchain, Y bank is testing the blockchain"
Real title: " Majority of Securities Firms Plan to Explore Blockchain This Year" - Coindesk is suggesting that all these news are related with Bitcoin which is false. These companies have nothing related with Bitcoin and they will not have.
100% no bank is paying for shits like these. The banks are not advertising on Coindesk.
I think they are just trying to mislead the readers with these news and to pump up somehow the BTC price...