Our mission is to test and write reviews about different BTC gambling sites. We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support. We cover: roulette, dice, poker, sportsbetting, slots, blackjack, lottery and baccarat.
We are developing an application to filter all the sites based their availability in different countries.
Visit coingambling.io to find the best BTC gambling site for your favourite game.
How do you weigh up the difference of opinion from what you see when you manually test a gambling website versus what is said about either the owners, investors and developers on various forums?
If you even think of adding scamming gambling websites to your list you will lose any credibility you might generate in future.
Do those websites pay you to get listed after review?
https://coingambling.io/cloudbet-review/ there has been a lot of activity in the Cloudbet thread here in this forum surely that should be taken in to account when users highlighted issues such as lack of cookie notification and not having GDPR European Law. So I cannot agree with all what was written in your review.
Stake, Primedice and Bitsler are excellent looking sites with excellent reputations but Betking has a disastrous reputation because of the way they promoted a non-existent 50 BTC dice game and the way its owner Dean Nolan fooled ICO investors to part with over $6.5 million which was never spent on the things the ICO whitepaper stated.
Your reviews should include more background too because when scammers like Dean Nolan and Betking can siphon off ICO funds to their own pockets then they do not deserve a positive review even if the website looks respectable.
