How is it in any way distorted if that is the price people are willing to pay? Ripple has performed well, even prior to being re-listed. Check the charts.
Ok i will tell you.
CoinMarketCap.com is/was seen as a Benchmark which cryptocoin
gain in popularity (measured by mined coins * last price)
Now Ripple,Nxt,MasterCoin are added to the list which work like the direct opposite of Bitcoin .
They are centralised and "minted" = not mined.
So comparing a digital Currency which is minted vs. one which need time to be mined is
like cheating in a benchmark comparison, because the measurement is distorted.
Its like comparing the IQ of a kid with an developped adult.
(coin amount needs growing time vs. all coins aviable).
It is just biased.
The curiosity is, "biased" is used as argument against the people who point on the fact
the to types of currencies can not be compared on one page.
I hope i could explained the problem.
greetings
The same way some coins like Quark or other coins cheated Bitcoin by mining almost all of their coin supply in 1 year while Bitcoin will take another 130.
Quark did avoid that whole problem that BTC has where; no one can mine it effectively
and lets say ASICS drop by 70% in price - Diff will just go up ? its a bit of a catch 22 ?