This statement is nonsense [let me add that I have nothing to do with these three particular coins]. Volume defines what is 'good' at a given time as it's traded among people's money. I could care less about a coin that has $100M marketcap but a very low daily volume. It's completely irrelevant to me, hence not good.
I do not share your ideological thinking. I see things through a capitalistic rather than ideological lens, you see.
You knowledge of the cryptocoins is very limited then. Bitcoindark was created to try and steal some fame of Darkcoin, failed utterly.I do not share your ideological thinking. I see things through a capitalistic rather than ideological lens, you see.
Looks like cloak was/is being abandoned.
Stellar is just stellar, if you read enough in the past days (probably, hell most likely did not) you would have known.
The volume just shows where the whales are having their fun.
Let me add that I had cloak and sold it at the recent high.
LaudaM, you do not understand. Bitcoindark, for instance, has both rise and volume. From my standpoint, this is good. I do not ideologically judge a coin at all - I judge its market value best reflected by its volume. I do not care whether it's called Dogecoin or Bitcoindark or Laudacoin, whether it is premined or not or this or that, I care whether it is traded at a high volume or not. Stellar, for example, is extremely popular and has a high volume, a great market for trading. You must understand that your entire point is of ideological nature, hence completely useless to me. If it's able to increase my capital, it is good. Capital is important to me, not ideology.
p.s. bitcointalk-account status does not correlate with knowledge of cryptocurrency markets. why so arrogant?
