Pages:
Author

Topic: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s - page 26. (Read 231002 times)

hero member
Activity: 608
Merit: 500
Asus 66U, dd-wrt. I doubt that's the difference, though. Btw, I jinxed myself. One of the units spontaneously shut off today for several hours until I noticed it (so 800GH for several hours). A software reboot fixed things...  but still concerning.
One of my units did the same thing so don't feel bad and at least when yours runs it ran at 1600.  It shut down and I didn't notice that one of the chips had been down the whole day until I got home at night.

The same chip that shut down also runs a lot slower than the other chip-sometimes CTA1 (the bad CTA) will report only like 100Ghash until I power cycle it...really have to wonder if there's a bad core or something
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
volcanic,

they will no doubt be saved by their flagship product, a brand new 400Ghs device which will be available in only four short months!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
It's funny because in the 3 decades I have walked this planet, I have NEVER seen a product without some kind of documentation, whether it be a manual, or simply a piece of paper that says "thank you for buying.."  The only exception would be food products.
I still can't believe it, actually.  I wonder why they are so incompetent?  They had millions of dollars at their disposal, so why are they THIS bad?  I don't even have the TH/s they promised me, so how does this even make it a valid sale... I hope they get their asses handed to them by lawsuits, due to the fact they fail so hard at every aspect of business.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
Umm, even experts like their manuals.  It's just a standard thing to ship with something like this.  Don't be stupid.

apparently they don't have time to even process a refund.  How will they make time to do an instruction manual.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Umm, even experts like their manuals.  It's just a standard thing to ship with something like this.  Don't be stupid.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
They really should have had instructions.



It would be like McDonalds forgetting the straw, except that this is a $6000 product and not a happy meal.

this is not a toaster, or a router..  it is highly specialize bitcoin mining equipement.. if you don't know how, or cant figure out how to use it..  don't buy it.


PS... who reads instructions anyway Smiley :::  "honey, stop at the gas station and ask for directions."  No way!!  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
They really should have had instructions.



It would be like McDonalds forgetting the straw, except that this is a $6000 product and not a happy meal.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I tried not to laugh when I opened my box today.. this is the first computer hardware I have ever seen that DOESN'T come with a Users Manual!  Lol, WTF!  With all that extra time they spent getting this out the door, and they couldn't have someone print out a simple instruction sheet?  Oh man, Cointerra has LOSER written all over them.   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I say we start a campaign to warn all newbies not to purchase their new mining cards.  
If everyone makes at least 1 thread about it, we will raise some awareness.

Cointerra does NOT deserve any more business from ANYBODY, and no this isn't because there is no manual.
full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 100


has anyone here gotten a refund?  and how long did it take from the request?

I would get a refund asap  take advantage of this price dip
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Refund will take 2-3 weeks. That's what they said. I think it might take longer  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


has anyone here gotten a refund?  and how long did it take from the request?

why would you want a refund? unless did you order for the june batch?

april batch will be delivered when??  not looking too rosy where i stand.

also..i ordered 4th.. not 3.2 which is what looks like will be delivered with 2 terramners.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


has anyone here gotten a refund?  and how long did it take from the request?
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250

When you said " A software reboot fixed things... " do you mean you restarted CGMiner?

I would guess he meant he accessed the machine via ssh and typed "reboot" to reboot the box.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
Don
I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?
Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.
I have got up to 1.5
Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.
Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Asus 66U, dd-wrt. I doubt that's the difference, though. Btw, I jinxed myself. One of the units spontaneously shut off today for several hours until I noticed it (so 800GH for several hours). A software reboot fixed things...  but still concerning.

When you said " A software reboot fixed things... " do you mean you restarted CGMiner?
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
Hi   Undecided  how do you get on the interface password area  Huh  thanks in advance
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?
Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.
I have got up to 1.5
Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.
Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Asus 66U, dd-wrt. I doubt that's the difference, though. Btw, I jinxed myself. One of the units spontaneously shut off today for several hours until I noticed it (so 800GH for several hours). A software reboot fixed things...  but still concerning.
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.

Mines remote, but I asked what router was running and it was an Asus, but it also has Tomato running on it. 
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
I apologize if this has been asked already, but has anyone noticed any significant variance on either of the boards (from the status page)?

The first board, CTA0, is varying pretty wildly at higher power steps (~150GH/s up through 800GH/s) with quite a few errors (786 out of 378,000...not so bad, but way higher than CTA1). The only issue I've found so far is that out of the 8 cores on that board, 1 is reporting "0" voltage (all others are stable around ~620-630). Normally I didn't think that would pose such a wide swing in hash rate.

Anyone else with a [possibly] dead core?
hero member
Activity: 608
Merit: 500
I've got 3 rigs that all report 1.5-1.7 locally but only get 3.9 on any pool.  Anyone else experience this?
Thus far, I have only seen GMaxwell say that he can achieve the same hashrate as the interface claims.   Everyone else who has posted seems to be in the 1.3-1.45 TH/s range for each unit.   I believe Con addressed this already too.
I have got up to 1.5
Is that an average on one machine for a period of days or do you mean "every now and then it spikes up?"

12 hours. But the machine reports much higher....

My unit's built-in dashboard reports 1600 GH/s.  My pool (btcguild) reports about 1580 GH/s.  My custom share-logging mining dashboard calculates the hashrate at 1570 GH/s (which is a three hour average based on submitted shares).

So they are all fairly consistent for me.

Ditto. Almost identical numbers. 1620 dashboard, 1580 pool-side (Eligius 12-hour rate) which has been steady for a week.
Interesting, I wonder what the differences are between people getting the same hashrate locally and on the pool and people seeing large differences.  What kind of networking hardware do you run?  I'm using a linksys router with Tomato on it.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Just Fun!
I'm happy with them.  I prefer them primarily because they are stable while also being large enough that they don't have massive variance.

they are happy with you too... you give them 1.5-3% of your income. for what?

use p2pool and don´t support centralized mining!

Both parts of my "because..." sentence are important to me (I highlighted the second part for emphasis). 

In any case, this is off topic from this thread and we can continue the debate via PM or in the p2pool/btcguild threads.

i agree. the point is that there was a question and discussion rolled on.
Pages:
Jump to: