Looking forward to it. This really could help the currency/community.
YC
Any new updates and buzz?
YC
YC
More news coming soon (I promise). Thanks for your continued support.
Topic: Coinye [KOI/COYE] You can't kill a gayfish. - page 16. (Read 715923 times)
F1k,
Looking forward to it. This really could help the currency/community.
YC
More news coming soon (I promise). Thanks for your continued support.
Looking forward to it. This really could help the currency/community.
YC
More news coming soon (I promise). Thanks for your continued support.
It's a pity of this logo cute, the months passed, it's actually still alive, but without a good exchange!
We should pick a good exchange and start voting to get on it.
Any new updates and buzz?
YC
YC
More news coming soon (I promise). Thanks for your continued support.
It's a pity of this logo cute, the months passed, it's actually still alive, but without a good exchange!
Any new updates and buzz?
YC
I'm the only one they could get in touch with that is not willing to settle. With what they want, if I read it correctly, they will need to go through the Dutch legal system first. That will take them another year at least.
Only then can the case in NY proceed.
If they remove me as a defendant they only have 'untraceable' people left. I don't know the US legal system but I imagine that a ruling against people who's existence can not be proven is not going to happen.
That leads me to conclude that I am their only shot at getting a ruling to ban Coinye.
Would they be willing to spend a year or maybe two in Dutch courts to try and ban Coinye? They did not even try to look up my home address...
YC
Is there a possibility the entire lawsuit gets thrown out?
YC
YC
I'm the only one they could get in touch with that is not willing to settle. With what they want, if I read it correctly, they will need to go through the Dutch legal system first. That will take them another year at least.
Only then can the case in NY proceed.
If they remove me as a defendant they only have 'untraceable' people left. I don't know the US legal system but I imagine that a ruling against people who's existence can not be proven is not going to happen.
That leads me to conclude that I am their only shot at getting a ruling to ban Coinye.
Would they be willing to spend a year or maybe two in Dutch courts to try and ban Coinye? They did not even try to look up my home address...
Everything works perfectly fine.
This site provides everything what you need to start with coinye: http://coinyethecoin.com/
There are even automatically updated nodes:
Instead of checking the new official site, people are asking same questions again and again.
This site provides everything what you need to start with coinye: http://coinyethecoin.com/
There are even automatically updated nodes:
Quote
addnode=5.19.247.206:41338
addnode=108.58.177.204:41338
addnode=118.200.17.76:41338
addnode=211.101.15.143:41338
addnode=108.58.177.204:41338
addnode=118.200.17.76:41338
addnode=211.101.15.143:41338
Instead of checking the new official site, people are asking same questions again and again.
Doesn't make sense since the circulation is still going.
YC
There are no active nodes.
I was with this program from inception and never had a problem with my wallet syncing, but now it shows there are NO active connections to the network.
I even pasted this long ass list into the config file and restarted and nothing.
http://pastebin.com/j1N3Msqr
I am guessing everyone finally gave up?!?!?
YC
Good to see its not dead, thats an accomplishment!!!
There are no active nodes.
I was with this program from inception and never had a problem with my wallet syncing, but now it shows there are NO active connections to the network.
I even pasted this long ass list into the config file and restarted and nothing.
http://pastebin.com/j1N3Msqr
I am guessing everyone finally gave up?!?!?
Good to see its not dead, thats an accomplishment!!!
There are no active nodes.
I was with this program from inception and never had a problem with my wallet syncing, but now it shows there are NO active connections to the network.
I even pasted this long ass list into the config file and restarted and nothing.
http://pastebin.com/j1N3Msqr
I am guessing everyone finally gave up?!?!?
Good to see its not dead, thats an accomplishment!!!
coye is dead?
Diff is at 1.4 and the circulation is 72,551,260,782. If I am not mistaken that is more than 50% of the total supply of the coin?!
With that being said, how do we continue to take advantage of this? Seems like if the suit does drop, it would be less risk for exchanges to list the coin. Liquidity would increase as well. Where is the rest of the community?
YC
YC
And it won't stop. There is too much coins in too many hands. Only problem is the lolsuit, they are suing people,exchanges, so it can't be widely used as a means of payment. I'm sure that if they will drop the lawsuit, price will go up. It will be possible to develop something for the coin without worries about being sued.
But its obvious they will go for the "kill", because they have the time(but I don't think that time works on their favour). Kanye probably has the money to do it, don't know if he actually wants to do this. It will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars(he hired probably the best lawyers) and he has NOTHING to gain. That's also possible future market cap of coinye, at least Kanye thinks so.
But its obvious they will go for the "kill", because they have the time(but I don't think that time works on their favour). Kanye probably has the money to do it, don't know if he actually wants to do this. It will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars(he hired probably the best lawyers) and he has NOTHING to gain. That's also possible future market cap of coinye, at least Kanye thinks so.
And it won't stop. There is too much coins in too many hands. Only problem is the lolsuit, they are suing people,exchanges, so it can't be widely used as a means of payment. I'm sure that if they will drop the lawsuit, price will go up. It will be possible to develop something for the coin without worries about being sued.
But its obvious they will go for the "kill", because they have the time(but I don't think that time works on their favour). Kanye probably has the money to do it, don't know if he actually wants to do this. It will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars(he hired probably the best lawyers) and he has NOTHING to gain. That's also possible future market cap of coinye, at least Kanye thinks so.
But its obvious they will go for the "kill", because they have the time(but I don't think that time works on their favour). Kanye probably has the money to do it, don't know if he actually wants to do this. It will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars(he hired probably the best lawyers) and he has NOTHING to gain. That's also possible future market cap of coinye, at least Kanye thinks so.
How can you establish buzz with these new findings? People need to get excited. Crazy enough is that half the circulation of coins is out there and it is not stopping. What happens when all coins are in circulation and the suit gets dropped?
I'm the only one they could get in touch with that is not willing to settle. With what they want, if I read it correctly, they will need to go through the Dutch legal system first. That will take them another year at least.
Only then can the case in NY proceed.
If they remove me as a defendant they only have 'untraceable' people left. I don't know the US legal system but I imagine that a ruling against people who's existence can not be proven is not going to happen.
That leads me to conclude that I am their only shot at getting a ruling to ban Coinye.
Would they be willing to spend a year or maybe two in Dutch courts to try and ban Coinye? They did not even try to look up my home address...
Is there a possibility the entire lawsuit gets thrown out?
YC
YC
I'm the only one they could get in touch with that is not willing to settle. With what they want, if I read it correctly, they will need to go through the Dutch legal system first. That will take them another year at least.
Only then can the case in NY proceed.
If they remove me as a defendant they only have 'untraceable' people left. I don't know the US legal system but I imagine that a ruling against people who's existence can not be proven is not going to happen.
That leads me to conclude that I am their only shot at getting a ruling to ban Coinye.
Would they be willing to spend a year or maybe two in Dutch courts to try and ban Coinye? They did not even try to look up my home address...
Is there a possibility the entire lawsuit gets thrown out?
YC
YC
I'm the only one they could get in touch with that is not willing to settle. With what they want, if I read it correctly, they will need to go through the Dutch legal system first. That will take them another year at least.
Only then can the case in NY proceed.
If they remove me as a defendant they only have 'untraceable' people left. I don't know the US legal system but I imagine that a ruling against people who's existence can not be proven is not going to happen.
That leads me to conclude that I am their only shot at getting a ruling to ban Coinye.
Would they be willing to spend a year or maybe two in Dutch courts to try and ban Coinye? They did not even try to look up my home address...
Is there a possibility the entire lawsuit gets thrown out?
YC
At first, I will need to catch my breath because every time I read it I can't stop laughing. Words can not describe their creative interpretations.
I'm writing my response to counter most of their claims.
I wonder why they waited so long to introduce that e-mail into court, as it was sent January 23rd. I was not informed of being added to the lawsuit till February 28th. I'm unsure if my response to this is the right place or time to get clarification on that.
I'm confused about how they interpreted the e-mail, does it really read like 'if you want to sue Coinye devs sue me'? Because I never intended that. Ugh. And I was under the impression I was decently skilled in English >.>
YC
What are your next steps?
YC
YC
At first, I will need to catch my breath because every time I read it I can't stop laughing. Words can not describe their creative interpretations.
I'm writing my response to counter most of their claims.
I wonder why they waited so long to introduce that e-mail into court, as it was sent January 23rd. I was not informed of being added to the lawsuit till February 28th. I'm unsure if my response to this is the right place or time to get clarification on that.
I'm confused about how they interpreted the e-mail, does it really read like 'if you want to sue Coinye devs sue me'? Because I never intended that. Ugh. And I was under the impression I was decently skilled in English >.>
What are your next steps?
YC
YC
At first, I will need to catch my breath because every time I read it I can't stop laughing. Words can not describe their creative interpretations.
I'm writing my response to counter most of their claims.
I wonder why they waited so long to introduce that e-mail into court, as it was sent January 23rd. I was not informed of being added to the lawsuit till February 28th. I'm unsure if my response to this is the right place or time to get clarification on that.
I'm confused about how they interpreted the e-mail, does it really read like 'if you want to sue Coinye devs sue me'? Because I never intended that. Ugh. And I was under the impression I was decently skilled in English >.>
What are your next steps?
YC
YC
Okay, so we remember the video statement, right?
It took Kanye's lawyers 25 pages to respond to that.
It was a 7 minute video (and 10 seconds).
When I saw the pagecount my face was nog big enough to house my smile.
Down to business:
Their response: http://udoc.eu/reader/9ac9d8
Their evidence: http://udoc.eu/reader/697c79
They claim that based on that e-mail I sent I must be part of it all or something. I'm looking into this with my lawyers and will respond to it all. I think it is amazing how they treat both the service and the jurisdiction matters, they simply walk over international treaties by quoting American law, law that does not an can not apply to me.
A point of controversy: http://udoc.eu/reader/703c07
I received this in the same e-mail as the previous two files. How can they truthfully sign a paper where they said they sent an e-mail, and then attach it to the e-mail they just promised they had sent? Do they have a time-machine?
I'm sorry about publishing the e-mailaddresses, but this info is all in the case-docket and has been made public because of that. Therefore I feel it would hurt the honesty more if I redacted the last document than it would hurt to keep the addresses in here.
Good to see you are still among the free. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy to see your message after all that time
It took Kanye's lawyers 25 pages to respond to that.
It was a 7 minute video (and 10 seconds).
When I saw the pagecount my face was nog big enough to house my smile.
Down to business:
Their response: http://udoc.eu/reader/9ac9d8
Their evidence: http://udoc.eu/reader/697c79
They claim that based on that e-mail I sent I must be part of it all or something. I'm looking into this with my lawyers and will respond to it all. I think it is amazing how they treat both the service and the jurisdiction matters, they simply walk over international treaties by quoting American law, law that does not an can not apply to me.
A point of controversy: http://udoc.eu/reader/703c07
I received this in the same e-mail as the previous two files. How can they truthfully sign a paper where they said they sent an e-mail, and then attach it to the e-mail they just promised they had sent? Do they have a time-machine?
I'm sorry about publishing the e-mailaddresses, but this info is all in the case-docket and has been made public because of that. Therefore I feel it would hurt the honesty more if I redacted the last document than it would hurt to keep the addresses in here.
May 9 Update:
Good to see you are still among the free. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy to see your message after all that time
Is it on any platform yet?This era crooks everywhere.
Okay, so we remember the video statement, right?
It took Kanye's lawyers 25 pages to respond to that.
It was a 7 minute video (and 10 seconds).
When I saw the pagecount my face was nog big enough to house my smile.
Down to business:
Their response: http://udoc.eu/reader/9ac9d8
Their evidence: http://udoc.eu/reader/697c79
They claim that based on that e-mail I sent I must be part of it all or something. I'm looking into this with my lawyers and will respond to it all. I think it is amazing how they treat both the service and the jurisdiction matters, they simply walk over international treaties by quoting American law, law that does not an can not apply to me.
A point of controversy: http://udoc.eu/reader/703c07
I received this in the same e-mail as the previous two files. How can they truthfully sign a paper where they said they sent an e-mail, and then attach it to the e-mail they just promised they had sent? Do they have a time-machine?
I'm sorry about publishing the e-mailaddresses, but this info is all in the case-docket and has been made public because of that. Therefore I feel it would hurt the honesty more if I redacted the last document than it would hurt to keep the addresses in here.
Good to see you are still among the free. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy to see your message after all that time
It took Kanye's lawyers 25 pages to respond to that.
It was a 7 minute video (and 10 seconds).
When I saw the pagecount my face was nog big enough to house my smile.
Down to business:
Their response: http://udoc.eu/reader/9ac9d8
Their evidence: http://udoc.eu/reader/697c79
They claim that based on that e-mail I sent I must be part of it all or something. I'm looking into this with my lawyers and will respond to it all. I think it is amazing how they treat both the service and the jurisdiction matters, they simply walk over international treaties by quoting American law, law that does not an can not apply to me.
A point of controversy: http://udoc.eu/reader/703c07
I received this in the same e-mail as the previous two files. How can they truthfully sign a paper where they said they sent an e-mail, and then attach it to the e-mail they just promised they had sent? Do they have a time-machine?
I'm sorry about publishing the e-mailaddresses, but this info is all in the case-docket and has been made public because of that. Therefore I feel it would hurt the honesty more if I redacted the last document than it would hurt to keep the addresses in here.
May 9 Update:
Good to see you are still among the free. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy to see your message after all that time
Jump to: