Bitcoin = Open source P2P money
Crypto = digital currency
Crypto is not Bitcoin. You seem to include Bitcoin in Crypto, maybe because it's listed with many of the other shitcoin on various exchanges but that doesn't change the fact that Bitcoin is not Crypto. Bitcoin is (as said by the community) Open Source P2P money. You do not need exchange accounts to transfer Bitcoin from One account to another. The privacy you get is not provided by all the Cryptocurrencies.
I understand but I also do not.
I realize there is a difference between Bitcoin and Doge. But I also think they are similar enough to be considered both part of the same category of digital Currencies, known as Crypto Currencies.
At that point we can also start saying Monero and Bitcoin are not Cryptocurrencies which I really believe is not true. Metals do have differentiating properties. Some of them are more useless than others for specific use cases. It does not make two distinct metals non metals though just because one of them provides better transfer speed of electricity.
Altcoins have started from Bitcoin. Doge lets me transfer from one Wallet to another with no need for an Exchange account. Monero provides me more Privacy than Bitcoin. Is Monero then more Bitcoin than Bitcoin because it is Open Source and offers even more Privacy?
In this attempt of aggressively separating Bitcoin and the rest of the Cryptocurrencies I think a huge unhealthy confusion is created. It is weird to read the way you classify Bitcoin versus Crypto. Bitcoin is Open Source money and Crypto is digital Currency? Money is Currency. Bitcoin is digital. So Bitcoin is Open Source digital Currency and Crypto is Digital Currency but they are different? It makes no sense.
Makes more sense to separate them by saying Bitcoin is Decentralized while other Cryptocurrencies are not. Bitcoin is Open Source while others are not. But there are Coins which are Decentralized and Open Source too. Like Monero. What category do Bitcoin and Monero fall in?