Pages:
Author

Topic: Community and Bounty Manager - page 2. (Read 933 times)

full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 02:58:10 PM
#36
Wow... First of all this thread should be about Steve and the work that he has contributed to Gladius.

Out of the many telegram channels and ICOs I have been a part of and the many more I follow and have witnessed, I can say for certainty that Steve has done an amazing job. He has been fair, transparent, honest, hard-working. He has shown respect and courtesy to 9k+ members. He took the time out of his day to go above and beyond what was asked of him. This I have no doubt. He will be highly sought after as he is one of the best in the biz. I would gladly work with him again.

Who cares about getting into some internet/forum war with some other person who clearly has something against Steve. Clearly someone who has missed the boat and now wants to attack others for joining one of the best companies around. Who cares what status the person has here on BitcoinTalk. It has been absolutely wrong in every aspect of their replies. From the offensive terms to the knowledge of what a KYC is and how important it is for USA SEC standards and compliance. Any adjective used to describe someone else can be construed as offensive by either party. So I hold myself to higher standards than others and try and refrain from using any term that could be deemed derogatory and/or offensive to another. Not everyone has the same merits as others, that is clear.

Very ideal, I believe this post should have been so. (Sighs)
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
February 13, 2018, 02:39:43 PM
#35
He is the best manager i ever seen , handled all questions timely manner ! , we had good times , will definitely join with you again !
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
February 13, 2018, 02:37:29 PM
#34
Wow... First of all this thread should be about Steve and the work that he has contributed to Gladius.

Out of the many telegram channels and ICOs I have been a part of and the many more I follow and have witnessed, I can say for certainty that Steve has done an amazing job. He has been fair, transparent, honest, hard-working. He has shown respect and courtesy to 9k+ members. He took the time out of his day to go above and beyond what was asked of him. This I have no doubt. He will be highly sought after as he is one of the best in the biz. I would gladly work with him again.

Who cares about getting into some internet/forum war with some other person who clearly has something against Steve. Clearly someone who has missed the boat and now wants to attack others for joining one of the best companies around. Who cares what status the person has here on BitcoinTalk. It has been absolutely wrong in every aspect of their replies. From the offensive terms to the knowledge of what a KYC is and how important it is for USA SEC standards and compliance. Any adjective used to describe someone else can be construed as offensive by either party. So I hold myself to higher standards than others and try and refrain from using any term that could be deemed derogatory and/or offensive to another. Not everyone has the same merits as others, that is clear.
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 12:57:45 PM
#33
Imagine you would "reinterpret" the term "N***".
False equivalency fallacy. Do you even realize what you are comparing? Do you even know the origin of that word and the origin of pajeet? I think not.

No, as per US regulation Gladius was required to do KYC even for bounty participants. All participants submitted documents like Passport, Driving Licence, etc. and OP had done[1] exceptional efforts to compare all documents and pointed out connected accounts.
I was not aware of this. So, you are telling me that "2000 users" essentially doxxed themselves[1] to earn some satoshis? This makes the situation even worse.

Mocking others for broken English (while there isn't much problem with posts except one Russian posts) and diverting thread towards other direction ≠ Facts.
What I posted is undeniably a fact. If you can't comprehend it, then that is your problem and not mine.

The further this thread goes, the more suspicious it gets. Aside from webtricks and 1 more user (who I do not remember individually right now/can't bother to check again), all of them are shitposters.

[1] Basically, OP had access to >= 2000 (according to him) government-issued documents? If OP is even remotely similar to Quickseller, you can safely assume that all the documents will be kept. Lips sealed

For someone who likes to conserve their Joules, you definitely are giving a lot of attention to this.

Also Disagreement=Shitposting, new definition after Pajeet.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
February 13, 2018, 12:39:46 PM
#32
Imagine you would "reinterpret" the term "N***".
False equivalency fallacy. Do you even realize what you are comparing? Do you even know the origin of that word and the origin of pajeet? I think not.

No, as per US regulation Gladius was required to do KYC even for bounty participants. All participants submitted documents like Passport, Driving Licence, etc. and OP had done[1] exceptional efforts to compare all documents and pointed out connected accounts.
I was not aware of this. So, you are telling me that "2000 users" essentially doxxed themselves[1] to earn some satoshis? This makes the situation even worse.

Mocking others for broken English (while there isn't much problem with posts except one Russian posts) and diverting thread towards other direction ≠ Facts.
What I posted is undeniably a fact. If you can't comprehend it, then that is your problem and not mine.

The further this thread goes, the more suspicious it gets. Aside from webtricks and 1 more user (who I do not remember individually right now/can't bother to check again), all of them are shitposters.

[1] Basically, OP had access to >= 2000 (according to him) government-issued documents? If OP is even remotely similar to Quickseller, you can safely assume that all the documents will be kept. Lips sealed
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 106
February 13, 2018, 12:26:32 PM
#31
 Smiley okay i will talk about you now

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

you are is the best manager sir
more power for you  Wink

 Grin one merit for you
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1759
February 13, 2018, 12:18:29 PM
#30
KYC was conducted extensively after Bounty Campaign was over and from what I know it entails identity verification of the individual, he even linked all the BCT Bounty Accounts to there verified Gladius accounts.
That has literally nothing to do with actual KYC.

No, as per US regulation Gladius was required to do KYC even for bounty participants. All participants submitted documents like Passport, Driving Licence, etc. and OP had done exceptional efforts to compare all documents and pointed out connected accounts. This can also be taken as proof for accounts connected, I will post all such accounts in 'Alt Known Thread' in my free time.

Why so much negativity?
Posting facts =/= being negative.

Mocking others for broken English (while there isn't much problem with posts except one Russian posts) and diverting thread towards other direction ≠ Facts.

I am still waiting for a day when Lauda would show some friendly gesture or simply stop thinking herself to be superior than the world, finger crossed!  Lips sealed
The thought of being superior than the people that posted in this thread is not even worth the joules spent on it. Being friendly is most often a waste of time.

Whelp, at least your post history isn't bad enough to be added to the SMAS blacklist. This can't be said for the others.

I'm honored.  Roll Eyes


 Wink Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1085
Merit: 1000
ALT Add: APfc4bykKHxYSVkvzsLdQvmiTXvTgMiCRM
February 13, 2018, 12:16:24 PM
#29
great work steve, sadly that my twitter stake was not valid. but anyway thank you for your hard work and dedication. I am very happy being part of this bounty. In case you will manage another bounty, let me know. I will join again. thank you and more power!
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 284
February 13, 2018, 11:43:51 AM
#28
Hi! Thanks!

Ukraine2020    @mir2030    

Tell me, please, why I did not receive Bitcoins for my Singature company. In the table of signatures, I was specified. But not now.
My # - 1149

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Lx8l3-ZFxfk7NdgDuSwDJ2Q_waPaACqi5KBmmjDHfRM/edit#gid=0


Thank you!
                                    

Better contact him on Telegram, he's much more active there.

Thank you!

OK! =)
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 11:41:43 AM
#27
KYC was conducted extensively after Bounty Campaign was over and from what I know it entails identity verification of the individual, he even linked all the BCT Bounty Accounts to there verified Gladius accounts.
That has literally nothing to do with actual KYC.

Why so much negativity?
Posting facts =/= being negative.

I am still waiting for a day when Lauda would show some friendly gesture or simply stop thinking herself to be superior than the world, finger crossed!  Lips sealed
The thought of being superior than the people that posted in this thread is not even worth the joules spent on it. Being friendly is most often a waste of time.

Whelp, at least your post history isn't bad enough to be added to the SMAS blacklist. This can't be said for the others.

I think what's important is if the ICO team and Bounty Hunters have been satisfied or not. If you can find dissatisfaction among them, I'd consider that as real dissatisfaction.
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.

Veiled SMAS blacklist threat and of course I'm the latest addition. 😂
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 11:38:36 AM
#26
Hi! Thanks!

Ukraine2020    @mir2030    

Tell me, please, why I did not receive Bitcoins for my Singature company. In the table of signatures, I was specified. But not now.
My # - 1149

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Lx8l3-ZFxfk7NdgDuSwDJ2Q_waPaACqi5KBmmjDHfRM/edit#gid=0


Thank you!
                                    

Better contact him on Telegram, he's much more active there.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 284
February 13, 2018, 11:28:52 AM
#25
Hi! Thanks!

Ukraine2020    @mir2030    

Tell me, please, why I did not receive Bitcoins for my SIGNATURE company. In the table of signatures, I was specified. But not now.
My # - 1149

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Lx8l3-ZFxfk7NdgDuSwDJ2Q_waPaACqi5KBmmjDHfRM/edit#gid=0


Thank you!
                                    
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 11:26:25 AM
#24
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.
The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect.
Pajeet is not a racial slur. #DiDYouKnow that: Words can have different meanings? I guess not.
In the context of Bitcointalk we have established a new meaning for said word. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with. Now, stop spamming the thread with useless nonsense. Optimally, quit the forum altogether.

I concur with the Cat, Pajeet isn't directed at one race, it is more a term of endearment for any 3rd world poster who cannot speak English fluently and is only here to earn mad satoshi from sig campaigns, bounties and whatever other handouts go on here now

cat isn't racist, I know for sure they regularly speak to foreign people
How is even the new meaning Not Racial ?

It refers specifically to a stereotype that you believe in, also I think the point that it's a term of endearment should be decided by those that are referred by it and not by the ones who shout it out.

I agree with what Walterw has said and he gave an absolutely brilliant example by using the N-word.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 258
Do you need a campaign manager? PM me.
February 13, 2018, 11:01:35 AM
#23
Neither does anyone else who used this word recently for the right purpose.

You can not know that at all. There are racists everywhere, also in this forum. Although this term has been reinterpreted here, I will never use it. The reason is, I know the origin and the real meaning.
Imagine you would "reinterpret" the term "N***". The only correct thing in such a situation is never to use this term even if it is "reinterpreted", since this term has a racist origin.
There are many other terms that can be used to describe a "shitposter".

Note: I do not say and I do not believe that you are a racist or have meant it racially, but you (and by you I do not mean you, I mean all of us) should still pay attention to the choice of words, in my opinion.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
February 13, 2018, 10:39:50 AM
#22
A new definition was submitted. Urban dictionary is literally a dictionary of, often made-up, meanings. Thus, our meaning.

I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with.
Neither does anyone else who used this word recently for the right purpose.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 258
Do you need a campaign manager? PM me.
February 13, 2018, 10:37:56 AM
#21
Pajeet is not a racial slur. [...]

[...]Pajeet isn't directed at one race[...]

Quote
A slang / racial slur for a smelly dirty curry drinking hairy Indian that poos in the loo.

Source:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Pajeet
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
February 13, 2018, 10:29:30 AM
#20
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.
The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect.
Pajeet is not a racial slur. #DiDYouKnow that: Words can have different meanings? I guess not.
In the context of Bitcointalk we have established a new meaning for said word. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with. Now, stop spamming the thread with useless nonsense. Optimally, quit the forum altogether.

I concur with the Cat, Pajeet isn't directed at one race, it is more a term of endearment for any 3rd world poster who cannot speak English fluently and is only here to earn mad satoshi from sig campaigns, bounties and whatever other handouts go on here now

cat isn't racist, I know for sure they regularly speak to foreign people
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 10:27:45 AM
#19
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.
The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect.
Pajeet is not a racial slur. #DiDYouKnow that: Words can have different meanings. I guess not.
In the context of Bitcointalk we have established a new meaning for said word. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you associate yourself. Now, stop spamming the thread with useless nonsense. Optimally, quit the forum altogether.

Wow! So now an altogether new excuse. Even I can start making new meanings for all the words that are racially offensive.


Also who are you to tell me that I should leave this forum, did you create it ?


If you are so offended, leave the post. You ain't even a moderator here, why SPAM when you know nothing ?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
February 13, 2018, 10:25:22 AM
#18
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.
The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect.
Pajeet is not a racial slur. #DiDYouKnow that: Words can have different meanings? I guess not.
In the context of Bitcointalk we have established a new meaning for said word. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with. Now, stop spamming the thread with useless nonsense. Optimally, quit the forum altogether.
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 166
February 13, 2018, 10:23:07 AM
#17
KYC was conducted extensively after Bounty Campaign was over and from what I know it entails identity verification of the individual, he even linked all the BCT Bounty Accounts to there verified Gladius accounts.
That has literally nothing to do with actual KYC.

Why so much negativity?
Posting facts =/= being negative.

I am still waiting for a day when Lauda would show some friendly gesture or simply stop thinking herself to be superior than the world, finger crossed!  Lips sealed
The thought of being superior than the people that posted in this thread is not even worth the joules spent on it. Being friendly is most often a waste of time.

Whelp, at least your post history isn't bad enough to be added to the SMAS blacklist. This can't be said for the others.

I think what's important is if the ICO team and Bounty Hunters have been satisfied or not. If you can find dissatisfaction among them, I'd consider that as real dissatisfaction.
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.


The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect.
Pages:
Jump to: