community backed legal entity to defend bitcoin related projects is a must

Matthew N. Wright

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet

Quote

community backed legal entity to defend bitcoin related projects is a must

I haven't read this thread yet and I don't think I need to, but this is a direct response to the title only:

You don't want an organization to "defend" a utility, you want a standards committee to maintain it unofficially. The more legal issues there are, the bigger a target any 'official' organization would be. What you want is something like the FED, not the Treasury.

nebulus

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

... it only gets better...

They are not going to do shit. They barely have money to stay in session. Plus, stopping bitcoin is a global effort, good luck organizing that.

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Gabi on February 16, 2012, 08:05:26 AM

Bitcoin is used by terrorists and criminals, it must be stopped for national security. Who use it must be a terrorist and must be arrested.

You forgot illegal gambling, kiddieporn and tax evasion.

btc_artist

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Bitcoin!

It would probably be a good idea to try and get organizations like EFF and others on board with the idea of Bitcoin and defending it.

Spekulatius

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 15, 2012, 06:08:06 AM

The bitcoin community is capable and creative in so many ways, but when it comes to the legal field and the interfaces with real world entities, it seems like we accept everything as a force of nature. Currency is all about trust and no trust can be built if the second biggest exchange can go down so easily. Since bitcoin was born there were countless incidents of illegal confiscation of funds by banks, Paypal and others. None of them was supported by court order or any official regulator. Entrepreneurs and investors will avoid bitcoin as long as the legal cloud is hanging there. The bitcoin experiment is doomed if we won't be able to defend it legally and if we won't support each other in such cases.

The good news are: bitcoin, in most countries is perfectly ok and has a good legal case. Banks and other financial entities are not allowed to refuse bitcoin business just because they don't like it. In the open source spirit, lets join forces and resources.

What do you think is the right way to go about it?

agreed!

Rassah

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1035

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:45:27 AM

I disagree. How can you compare bitcoin to silkroad?

Silk Road - legal or illegal, no matter what laws are passed or what politicians say about it, they can't do anything about it, and it will continue to exist, simply because people don't think it's wrong, and want it to exist.
Bitcoin - legal or illegal, no matter what laws are passed or what politicians say about it, they can't do anything about it, and it will continue to exist, simply because people don't think it's wrong, and want it to exist.

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:45:27 AM

SOPA is indeed a great example, but saying the people completely ignored it?? The efforts to stop it - probably the biggest campaign in the history of web rights - was successful!

It was successful, but had it failed, things like Tor, I2P, and Namecoin would have seen a huge surge in adoption, and once they became mainstream, "legal or illegal, no matter what laws are passed or what politicians say about it, they can't do anything about it, and it will continue to exist, simply because people don't think it's wrong, and want it to exist."

Quote from: farfiman on February 16, 2012, 05:14:35 AM

If it bitcoin survives like Tor,BT and SR then we have lost the battle to making Bitcoin a real alternative.

Just as we have lost the battle to making BitTorrent a real alternative for file sharing... wait...

gregwtmtno

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

As an attorney, I think that something like the EFF, but to defend the interests of bitcoin projects would be a good idea. At the very least, the threat of a law suit would make companies think twice about how they deal with bitcoin businesses. The problem is, like everything lawyers do, it wouldn't be cheap.

Gabi

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1008

If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 06:03:17 AM

Quote from: farfiman on February 16, 2012, 05:17:33 AM

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:31:37 AM

I'm not sure how it works in the US. In Israel, where i'm from, banks are regulated and can't refuse business without legal ground. About a month ago the regulator "released the banks from their duty to provide service for gambling sites" - http://www.yogonet.com/english/2012/01/11/israel-banks-can-refuse-to-handle-transactions-for-suspicious-websites
And take my word for it, Israel is not the most liberal country when it comes to human rights...

Just wait till somebody "up there" hears about bitcoin. The Israeli regulator will whip up a bitcoin clause in the same way
faster than you can say Satoshi Nakamoto.

Maybe they will. Why just sit and watch it happened? And why letting the banks do what ever they want when it didn't yet happen?

It won't happen in the same way as there are rules in Israel against gambling and no rules [yet] against bitcoin.

And, such rules are not that easy to pass. They'll need to define what bitcoin is, to explain how it differs from facebook money and the gaming industry money, why people living in democracies can't buy bits with their money, etc. It will be even harder if we put up some fight.

Bitcoin is used by terrorists and criminals, it must be stopped for national security. Who use it must be a terrorist and must be arrested.

speedybugsy

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:31:37 AM

And, such rules are not that easy to pass. They'll need to define what bitcoin is, to explain how it differs from facebook money and the gaming industry money, why people living in democracies can't buy bits with their money, etc. It will be even harder if we put up some fight.

good point

bahatassafus

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: farfiman on February 16, 2012, 05:17:33 AM

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:31:37 AM

I'm not sure how it works in the US. In Israel, where i'm from, banks are regulated and can't refuse business without legal ground. About a month ago the regulator "released the banks from their duty to provide service for gambling sites" - http://www.yogonet.com/english/2012/01/11/israel-banks-can-refuse-to-handle-transactions-for-suspicious-websites
And take my word for it, Israel is not the most liberal country when it comes to human rights...

Just wait till somebody "up there" hears about bitcoin. The Israeli regulator will whip up a bitcoin clause in the same way
faster than you can say Satoshi Nakamoto.

Maybe they will. Why just sit and watch it happened? And why letting the banks do what ever they want when it didn't yet happen?

It won't happen in the same way as there are rules in Israel against gambling and no rules [yet] against bitcoin.

And, such rules are not that easy to pass. They'll need to define what bitcoin is, to explain how it differs from facebook money and the gaming industry money, why people living in democracies can't buy bits with their money, etc. It will be even harder if we put up some fight.

Gabi

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1008

If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat

SOPA has been stopped...

Problem, ACTA is not being stopped

http://www.stopp-acta.info/english
http://www.stopacta.info/

farfiman

legendary

Activity: 1449

Merit: 1001

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 16, 2012, 04:31:37 AM

I'm not sure how it works in the US. In Israel, where i'm from, banks are regulated and can't refuse business without legal ground. About a month ago the regulator "released the banks from their duty to provide service for gambling sites" - http://www.yogonet.com/english/2012/01/11/israel-banks-can-refuse-to-handle-transactions-for-suspicious-websites
And take my word for it, Israel is not the most liberal country when it comes to human rights...

Just wait till somebody "up there" hears about bitcoin. The Israeli regulator will whip up a bitcoin clause in the same way
faster than you can say Satoshi Nakamoto.

farfiman

legendary

Activity: 1449

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Rassah on February 15, 2012, 03:29:16 PM

I think just as Tor, BitTorrent, and Silk Road scoff at laws and exist outside/despite them, Bitcoin will exist in the same way. It's getting to the point where the government is passing laws or threatening lawsuits to try to stop something they can't control (SOPA is a great recent example), and the people are just completely ignoring them, since they will have little effect in the end (not counting the anti-SOPA protests, though if it had passed, switching to I2P or Namecoin would've meant the government would have lost even more control).

If it bitcoin survives like Tor,BT and SR then we have lost the battle to making Bitcoin a real alternative.

bahatassafus

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: Rassah on February 15, 2012, 03:29:16 PM

I think just as Tor, BitTorrent, and Silk Road scoff at laws and exist outside/despite them, Bitcoin will exist in the same way. It's getting to the point where the government is passing laws or threatening lawsuits to try to stop something they can't control (SOPA is a great recent example), and the people are just completely ignoring them, since they will have little effect in the end (not counting the anti-SOPA protests, though if it had passed, switching to I2P or Namecoin would've meant the government would have lost even more control).

I disagree. How can you compare bitcoin to silkroad? this is exactly what we should fight against if we want bitcoin to get anywhere. bitcoin is to silkroad what cash is to street dealers. not more, not less.

SOPA is indeed a great example, but saying the people completely ignored it?? The efforts to stop it - probably the biggest campaign in the history of web rights - was successful! This is exactly what i'm hoping to see with bitcoin.

bahatassafus

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: rjk on February 15, 2012, 01:50:53 PM

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 15, 2012, 06:08:06 AM

The bitcoin community is capable and creative in so many ways, but when it comes to the legal field and the interfaces with real world entities, it seems like we accept everything as a force of nature. Currency is all about trust and no trust can be built if the second biggest exchange can go down so easily. Since bitcoin was born there were countless incidents of illegal confiscation of funds by banks, Paypal and others. None of them was supported by court order or any official regulator. Entrepreneur and investors will avoid bitcoin as long as the legal cloud is hanging there. The bitcoin experiment is doomed if we won't be able to defend it legally and if we won't support each other in such cases.

The good news are: bitcoin, in most countries is perfectly ok and has a good legal case. Banks and other financial entities are not allowed to refuse bitcoin business just because they don't like it. In the open source spirit, lets join forces and resources.

What do you think is the right way to go about it?

Citation needed.

I'm not sure how it works in the US. In Israel, where i'm from, banks are regulated and can't refuse business without legal ground. About a month ago the regulator "released the banks from their duty to provide service for gambling sites" - http://www.yogonet.com/english/2012/01/11/israel-banks-can-refuse-to-handle-transactions-for-suspicious-websites
And take my word for it, Israel is not the most liberal country when it comes to human rights...
A quick search brings similar results for the UK and Canada.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2010/03/a_legal_right_to_a_bank_accoun.html
http://settlement.org/sys/faqs_detail.asp?faq_id=4000635
But, if it was that easy, i would not bring the subject up. The legal case should demonstrate the contradictions of such actions with Freedom of occupation the Bill of Rights etc.

Rassah

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1035

I think just as Tor, BitTorrent, and Silk Road scoff at laws and exist outside/despite them, Bitcoin will exist in the same way. It's getting to the point where the government is passing laws or threatening lawsuits to try to stop something they can't control (SOPA is a great recent example), and the people are just completely ignoring them, since they will have little effect in the end (not counting the anti-SOPA protests, though if it had passed, switching to I2P or Namecoin would've meant the government would have lost even more control).

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Just a thought:

I saw some lawyers accepts BTC for their services, perhaps contacting those lawyers with this idea and see what they says ?

hazek

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1003

The US government forced all Swiss banks to conform to their rules about how private they want to be. Please. There is no country or bank on this planet that isn't controlled by the status quo. What makes you think a legal team can change that.

They can and are doing what they want and we will either overcome their roadblocks or get defeated by them.

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: 4lph4zulu on February 15, 2012, 02:02:55 PM

http://eprints.ucm.es/6428/1/9.Cuenta_corriente.pdf

No hablo español.

Quote from: 4lph4zulu on February 15, 2012, 02:02:55 PM

It depends mainly on what you have signed with your bank.
Are bitcoins different from any other product?
Have banks a legal base to freeze your account if you follow AML and fiscal regulations?

True, if you have an account they can't keep your money for following regulations. But they don't have to let you set up an account in the first place, if they don't want to, and if they kick you out and return all your money, that is not illegal either.

4lph4zulu

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: rjk on February 15, 2012, 01:50:53 PM

Quote from: bahatassafus on February 15, 2012, 06:08:06 AM

The bitcoin community is capable and creative in so many ways, but when it comes to the legal field and the interfaces with real world entities, it seems like we accept everything as a force of nature. Currency is all about trust and no trust can be built if the second biggest exchange can go down so easily. Since bitcoin was born there were countless incidents of illegal confiscation of funds by banks, Paypal and others. None of them was supported by court order or any official regulator. Entrepreneur and investors will avoid bitcoin as long as the legal cloud is hanging there. The bitcoin experiment is doomed if we won't be able to defend it legally and if we won't support each other in such cases.

The good news are: bitcoin, in most countries is perfectly ok and has a good legal case. Banks and other financial entities are not allowed to refuse bitcoin business just because they don't like it. In the open source spirit, lets join forces and resources.

What do you think is the right way to go about it?

Citation needed.

http://eprints.ucm.es/6428/1/9.Cuenta_corriente.pdf

It depends mainly on what you have signed with your bank.
Are bitcoins different from any other product?
Have banks a legal base to freeze your account if you follow AML and fiscal regulations?

Topic: community backed legal entity to defend bitcoin related projects is a must (Read 2253 times)