Community opinion on these 2 accounts - page 3.

cabalism13

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1166

🤩Finally Married🤩

Quote from: Argie021213 on April 26, 2018, 01:15:03 AM

I have some points to consider upon reviewing these two concerned accounts.
First: The exchanges of merit obviously shows that these people are related to each other, perhaps friends.
Second: They have different style of post, it's just that since they're friends, they copy each other message to raise concern upon reviewing about their weekly campaign result.
IMO these were not alts of each other but rather friends.

You're Absolutely Right. This Accusation is a BIG MISTAKE. I hope Sir Yahoo will take a consideration to this issue.

Quote

Yeah, were you in the same room with them when they sent what amounts to the exact same PM to Yahoo62278?

YES. I can actually prove it. Because We're on a group chat for us BCT Members, I know you don't even give a shit on bounty spammers but this isn't the issue here.

Quote

Why would two different people write the same message?Why would the second message sender paraphrase the first message?

Actually their actions might be wrong as for one person just asked on what to do, and the second person just copied his message and edit it with their linked accounts, since it was a PM, they didnt mind it if it was just a copy paste or something, as I think COPY/PASTE is only PROHIBITED on the posts

Quote

I don't buy it at all, and I've seen enough of this bullshit behavior by bounty spammers to not believe a story like you're spinning. Let's hear what others have to say.

You don't have to buy it, it just happened that I know them, and some of us on our Group would possibly send proofs. It's not just me who'll testify about their innocence.

EDITED: FOR THE PHARMACIST

Of course, it's only necessary for us to help this persons. YOU CAN'T JUST HAVE IT YOUR WAY ON PUTTING RED MARKS AS YOU ALWAYS DO. SOMETIMES YOU'LL ALSO MAKE A FALSE JUDGEMENT SUCH AS THIS. You may actually have your reason to give them RED TRUST, but since that we're defending on this guys, SOONER OR LATER YOU'LL REALIZE THAT THIS WAS JUST A MISTAKE AND REMOVE THOSE RED MARKS ON THEM.

And REALLY?... Don't ever include me on those shitposters... Don't Judge A Person Just Because They Created A Single Mistake.

Quote

I'm curious as to whether he's gong to show up here to defend himself and what his excuse is going to be.

They'll Be Here Soon. Just wait until then.

vinz7229

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 128

Quote from: Argie021213 on April 26, 2018, 01:15:03 AM

I have some points to consider upon reviewing these two concerned accounts.
First: The exchanges of merit obviously shows that these people are related to each other, perhaps friends.
Second: They have different style of post, it's just that since they're friends, they copy each other message to raise concern upon reviewing about their weekly campaign result.
IMO these were not alts of each other but rather friends.

that's true, giving atleast 1-2 merits to a particular person is good but i know it is againts the rule. and as far as i know i only give 2 merits to satry which i think she deserved to have that merit. Satry and I know each other for the reason that she is my officemate and we decided to create a bitcoin group so that we can help each other if someone needs helps when it comes to bitcoin matter. you can also check our BTC ADDRESS that we usually use in joining signature and bounty campaign. WE use COINS.PH wallet address in our country which requires a one time application and also requesting for a valid identification information. you can visit this links for future reference. https://coins.ph/user-agreement/

AmoreJaz

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

i try to stay out of these kind of things , But this is just a bit over the top obvious ! looking at their past posting and history = visible similarities that cannot be repeated by mere coincidence.
and i am sure that these are the same person.
this is my humble opinion!

if needed i can set up a way to prove one way or the other on my servers and do a full verification
i can set up a secured chat room and i will block all VPN and TOR networks and will run a script to scan the host and all the connection of the clients at the same time. if in-fact they are completely different they will not have any connecting IP's
but it will be two separate private chats and when i ask the same question to on they both have to answer basically the same . i have done this a few times in the past for proof and have caught each suspect in their tracts as they do not know how i am tracing them and how deep i can scan for their connections thru their ip addresses or even how i am doing it.
certainly it is not failsafe but it hasnt failed yet!

Amore Jaz

Argie021213

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

I have some points to consider upon reviewing these two concerned accounts.
First: The exchanges of merit obviously shows that these people are related to each other, perhaps friends.
Second: They have different style of post, it's just that since they're friends, they copy each other message to raise concern upon reviewing about their weekly campaign result.
IMO these were not alts of each other but rather friends.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 7005

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: cabalism13 on April 26, 2018, 01:06:53 AM

I've joined this discussion to clear their account from having Neg Trust. Truly Satry is one of my Mentors here and she even lend me a money for my needs.[/size]

Yeah, were you in the same room with them when they sent what amounts to the exact same PM to Yahoo62278? Why would two different people write the same message? Why would the second message sender paraphrase the first message?

I don't buy it at all, and I've seen enough of this bullshit behavior by bounty spammers to not believe a story like you're spinning. Let's hear what others have to say.

Here comes the shitposting brigade to the rescue:

Quote from: ?? on ??

We cannot judge them, We can consider as coincidence or the one was copied the other post because they have a same issue.

This user deleted his/her post?

Quote from: Argie021213 on April 26, 2018, 01:15:03 AM

IMO these were not alts of each other but rather friends.

This user (and the one above) posts almost exclusively in the mega spam threads. I wonder how they responded to this thread so fast.

Quote from: cabalism13 on April 26, 2018, 01:25:18 AM

I know you don't even give a shit on bounty spammers but this isn't the issue here.

Actuallly it very much is the issue, as I rejoice in any opportunity to paint you spamming fucks red.

cabalism13

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1166

🤩Finally Married🤩

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 26, 2018, 12:39:58 AM

There is absolutely no way those two accounts can't be the same person--and this person is an extreme dumbass for doing this, though it turned out to be a good thing for the community (albeit not for him) since he's now tagged. I reinforced your negative, Yahoo62278. This proof is about as solid as you can get IMO.

I'm curious as to whether he's gong to show up here to defend himself and what his excuse is going to be.

I completely DISAGREE with you sir, for the reason I knew this persons. They might have the same messages and this maybe the reason why you can tell that it is an alt account. BUT SADLY, your accusation isn't true for the reason I KNEW this persons and their accounts. I can send some proof that this accounts aren't related to ONE PERSON only.

I've joined this discussion to clear their account from having Neg Trust. Truly Satry is one of my Mentors here and she even lend me a money for my needs.

edited:

NOTE: I'll also have my account to be BANNED or even received a NEG trust if I'm just saying nonsense over this issue. I'm also willing to give up on my application to Byteball Sig Campaign if the said issue will not be proven as a mistake.

eldrin

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 143

Just checked their merits and they seems exchanged smerits. If only one person owns the two accounts, then he is not just abusing bounties, but merit system abuser as well.

monalia

member

Activity: 685

Merit: 14

These two accounts are using same person because merits also sharing simultaneously and PM also similar to both account. I think this merit system is easily identify the spam users in Crypto platform.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 4554

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Quote from: poptok1 on April 26, 2018, 12:44:29 AM

Those two PM's are damn similar to each other.
I think that nobody will hold a grudge against you for flagging those members. Such coincidences are rarely, truly coincidental Roll Eyes

Yet, as a prof of multi-account... tough nut to crack. If I were you, I would just ban them from my campaign and that's it, no extra red or accusations but that's just me. Maybe a simple PM from you with reprimand, rebuke and reprehension will make those guys behave?
You are a busy man, probably no time for a good investigation, I'm sure community will deliver

I'm not worried about anyone holding a grudge. Many people like me as well as a few don't, life goes on either way. I have made thew accused aware that this thread is here and that he may respond.

As far as his neg goes, if the community deems these are not alts I will remove his paint. If the majority agrees as I am pretty sure will be the case, then his neg stays because IMO cheating any campaign is grounds for a neg.

poptok1

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 756

Bobby Fischer was right

Those two PM's are damn similar to each other.
I think that nobody will hold a grudge against you for flagging those members. Such coincidences are rarely, truly coincidental Roll Eyes

Yet, as a prof of multi-account... tough nut to crack. If I were you, I would just ban them from my campaign and that's it, no extra red or accusations but that's just me. Maybe a simple PM from you with reprimand, rebuke and reprehension will make those guys behave?
You are a busy man, probably no time for a good investigation, I'm sure community will deliver

Edit: on the other hand, calling people 'sir' in the internets deserves a BAN xD

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 7005

Top Crypto Casino

There is absolutely no way those two accounts can't be the same person--and this person is an extreme dumbass for doing this, though it turned out to be a good thing for the community (albeit not for him) since he's now tagged. I reinforced your negative, Yahoo62278. This proof is about as solid as you can get IMO.

I'm curious as to whether he's gong to show up here to defend himself and what his excuse is going to be.

JustinBounty

member

Activity: 138

Merit: 15

They are quite clearly same and if you have a rule of not allowing multiple entries from the same person then they deserve a negative feedback for trying to cheat the bounty campaign.
I am only surprised why will someone send quick messages with same body (almost) and with 177 and 178 sheet numbers respectively.

The fact that they have applied for signature campaign quite closely makes it obvious that they are same

On the other hand, I really feel bad for such guys working so hard just though doing the wrong thing.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 4554

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Normally I don't look for the communities opinion on much but in this case I would like to hear some reactions and thoughts. I was in the middle of grading Byteballs twitter campaign when I received these 2 pms within a few minutes of each other. As you can see the messages are pretty damn close to the same.

Should their neg trust stay? Are these pms enough to prove they're the same person? I'll leave this open for discussion for 24 hours

Topic: Community opinion on these 2 accounts - page 3. (Read 1296 times)