Pages:
Author

Topic: Comparing two best wagering strategies so far. - page 2. (Read 223 times)

legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1922
Shuffle.com
I'll probably use this one in the future since one of my accounts is close to hitting the next VIP rank and sports betting isn't giving me that much progress even though the rates are usually doubled or tripled in most casinos.

For me that dice strategy worked many times in past and its still a good and working strategy for anyone who wants to complete the wagering requirements to rank up in short time. I haven't used that Plinko strategy but that one also seems like a good one I guess.
It's also my go-to strategy and sometimes I adjust it a bit higher (between 1.01 to 1.10) since you're likely losing 4 or more bets in every hundred you've placed.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 785
We all know that the best strategies regarding increasing your rank is to play dice 98% win with odds 1.01 and that in theory only 2 rolls out of 100 should be lost bets yet the reality in every single f*cking casino is the same, we see much more than 2 lost bets during 100 rolls, don't even start telling me that it evens out during our game play as I have had enough of idiots telling me that while I have tested millions of rolls in this strategy, anyway that is not the point, the point is that to wager from 0.50 dollars to 60-65 dollars is a nice achievement although with dice it needs like 1 - 1.30 dollars to go there and I have found out that with Plinko 16 rows low risk is much better. It takes like 0.50 or even less to reach it and the reason is because at Plinko 16 rows low risk you only have one 0.5x where you lose money while all other bets are money back or wins, the percentage of 0.5x is 19.89% which in theory it is 1 out of 5 balls to be a lost one, even here these is not reality and does not even out through millions of balls, however this is the best strategy ever to maximize your rank, I have used IDR to tell you that with almost 0.50 dollars spent you can have it wagered at least 60 dollars which is 120x your initial amount and not a bad strategy at all.
That's an awesome strategy you just provided above at O.P, as I look forward to giving it a try anything soon to see if I will be able to make profit while applying same strategy on Plinko while betting with a minimum amount of $0.5 for complete 120 rounds. As I'm still skeptical, since the product of the outcome of a slot machine games are always a product of random algorithms.
hero member
Activity: 862
Merit: 662
Thanks for sharing your insights! Comparing the dice 98% strategy to Plinko's 16-row low-risk setup highlights a key difference: while dice offers quick wins, its all or nothing losses can be devastating. Plinko, with only 19.89% of outcomes as losses (0.5x), provides better longevity, making it a more sustainable option for players aiming to maximize wagering.

That said, as you and Agbamoni noted, gambling outcomes rely on luck. Even over millions of rolls or balls, probabilities don’t always align perfectly. Your suggestion of betting 0.05% of your bankroll is excellent for reducing risk and staying in the game longer.

Ultimately, strategies like this should be approached cautiously. Always treat gambling as entertainment, use funds you can afford to lose, and avoid chasing losses. Sharing such strategies adds value, but realistic expectations are key.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 672
Top Crypto Casino
For me that dice strategy worked many times in past and its still a good and working strategy for anyone who wants to complete the wagering requirements to rank up in short time. I haven't used that Plinko strategy but that one also seems like a good one I guess.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 291
Bitcoin in Niger State💯
I am glad you said you tried it, and it worked for you. I will try it in two days when I get some money. In the meantime, I am still skeptical about how certain I am that it is a 98% win on the casino games.

We all know that it is difficult to say there is a best strategy when we are discussing gambling. The lowest odds sometimes have been a barrier to me winning in a lot of bets. My conclusion is still the fact that it is based on luck.

At the end of the day, gambling is still a game of luck, however experience also goes a long way to determine one's ability to take advantage of opportunities. Sometimes it's also your ability to outsmart the slightest chance availed to the game which also depends on the nature of gambling game you're involved in. As to whether there's an effect of expertise in gambling, it could be answered as yes but not so significant in sight of luck.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3217
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
I think you can still able to achieve increasing your rank on other games not only on Plinko just make sure to consistently bet with a small amount.
The only difference may be the time spent, as I have experience betting on Super Ace with $0.2 on a consistent basis and switching between Fortune Gems 2 and 3 to achieve a wager of around $60, but it is time consuming.
Your strategy appears to be achievable in a relatively short period of time?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4603
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
Regardless of the strat that you use, it's still gambling and you are expected to lose in the long run. I am curious about dice and you though. When you take a loss do you increase your bet and try to recover in 1 or 2 bets or keep the same bet the whole way?

Plinko is ok but you'll find a streak of .5 hits that'll tilt ya if you're not careful.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1247
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
I am glad you said you tried it, and it worked for you. I will try it in two days when I get some money. In the meantime, I am still skeptical about how certain I am that it is a 98% win on the casino games.

We all know that it is difficult to say there is a best strategy when we are discussing gambling. The lowest odds sometimes have been a barrier to me winning in a lot of bets. My conclusion is still the fact that it is based on luck.

In any dice game in any casino there is so called 98% win chance with odds 1.01 which is considered by many to be the fastest wagering strategy to your next VIP level. I have quit depositing myself and was enjoying these December month bonus which keeps popping up like crazy nowadays and why not using all of them to at least get a nice, very nice weekly bonus next Saturday. However with that dice 98% strategy it is a bad one as you win 1.01x every time and when you lose you lose 100% of the bet while with this Plinko strategy it works better as out of 16 places you only have one place where you lose the 0.5x and when you lose you lose 50% of your bet while every other possibility is either 1x win or more so overall it keeps you playing longer although it is slower, that is the only down thing about this strategy, just wanted to share it for people having trouble increasing their ranks, always only use money you can afford to lose and don't overstretch yourself just to try this strategy.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 447
Fine by Time
I am glad you said you tried it, and it worked for you. I will try it in two days when I get some money. In the meantime, I am still skeptical about how certain I am that it is a 98% win on the casino games.

We all know that it is difficult to say there is a best strategy when we are discussing gambling. The lowest odds sometimes have been a barrier to me winning in a lot of bets. My conclusion is still the fact that it is based on luck.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1247
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
We all know that the best strategies regarding increasing your rank is to play dice 98% win with odds 1.01 and that in theory only 2 rolls out of 100 should be lost bets yet the reality in every single f*cking casino is the same, we see much more than 2 lost bets during 100 rolls, don't even start telling me that it evens out during our game play as I have had enough of idiots telling me that while I have tested millions of rolls in this strategy, anyway that is not the point, the point is that to wager from 0.50 dollars to 60-65 dollars is a nice achievement although with dice it needs like 1 - 1.30 dollars to go there and I have found out that with Plinko 16 rows low risk is much better. It takes like 0.50 or even less to reach it and the reason is because at Plinko 16 rows low risk you only have one 0.5x where you lose money while all other bets are money back or wins, the percentage of 0.5x is 19.89% which in theory it is 1 out of 5 balls to be a lost one, even here these is not reality and does not even out through millions of balls, however this is the best strategy ever to maximize your rank, I have used IDR to tell you that with almost 0.50 dollars spent you can have it wagered at least 60 dollars which is 120x your initial amount and not a bad strategy at all.

I have made this thread because many people are struggling even to reach the first level of VIP ranks, with this Plinko strategy they can do it in no time, they just have to be patient if they want to use IDR or if they use dollars they can reach it much faster. I use 0.05% of my total bankroll as a bet, you can use whatever your like.



Pages:
Jump to: