Author

Topic: COMPARISON BITCOIN MINING ASSETS (Read 2004 times)

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
November 05, 2013, 12:18:46 PM
#22
I dont see ADDICTION in the list Smiley

I have added ADDICTION, can you correct if necessary?
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 05, 2013, 12:16:14 PM
#21
There's also Nasty Fans, hashing at 420 GH/s as of right now - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nastyfans-the-bitcoin-enthusiast-fan-club-est-2012-86854

IMO Nasty Fans is not an asset and can not be added

Interesting viewpoint.  Looks like we've succeeded in removing the risks associated with operating an asset.  Grin

In all fairness though, NastyFans receives revenue not just from "BITCOIN MINING" but also running our own pool, mining LTC/NMC/DVC/I0C/IXC and selling custom silver coins.  A comparison using just the Bitcoin mining operation would be telling only 1/4 of the story anyway.  Wink
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
November 05, 2013, 11:51:28 AM
#20

Not that this makes any difference, but Active Mining is *reinvesting* 50% of the divs.  Make sure to swallow all the coffee before looking here.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
November 05, 2013, 11:36:39 AM
#19
I dont see ADDICTION in the list Smiley
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
November 05, 2013, 05:16:19 AM
#18
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 11, 2013, 03:21:10 AM
#17
I have added Activemining to the list.

Do they have concrete dates and capacities for future deployments?

I suppose the Avalon chip orders will not be deployed.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 02:04:31 PM
#16
There's also Nasty Fans, hashing at 420 GH/s as of right now - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nastyfans-the-bitcoin-enthusiast-fan-club-est-2012-86854

IMO Nasty Fans is not an asset and can not be added
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 01:33:24 PM
#15
RSM's dividend history is empty. I don't recall their contract, but I don't believe it's 100%. I think they're focused on growth.

RSM has 90% reinvestment, but first dividend will be 100% paid.

There's also Nasty Fans, hashing at 420 GH/s as of right now - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nastyfans-the-bitcoin-enthusiast-fan-club-est-2012-86854

From https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/796com-redstarminingcom-the-oldest-public-mining-security-150ths-63257
Two 400(GH/s)@28nm KNC Jupiters be added for 80,000 shares by October

So Dilution will stop at the moment dividends can pay for reinvestements?


Nasty Fans : I will look into this

Dilution was used only at the beginning, because there was no actual hashing until week ago. So no reinvestment fund. Fund should be estabilished in about 3 weeks
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 01:31:14 PM
#14
RSM's dividend history is empty. I don't recall their contract, but I don't believe it's 100%. I think they're focused on growth.

RSM has 90% reinvestment, but first dividend will be 100% paid.

There's also Nasty Fans, hashing at 420 GH/s as of right now - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nastyfans-the-bitcoin-enthusiast-fan-club-est-2012-86854

From https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/796com-redstarminingcom-the-oldest-public-mining-security-150ths-63257
Two 400(GH/s)@28nm KNC Jupiters be added for 80,000 shares by October

So Dilution will stop at the moment dividends can pay for reinvestements?


Nasty Fans : I will look into this
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 01:26:37 PM
#13
RSM's dividend history is empty. I don't recall their contract, but I don't believe it's 100%. I think they're focused on growth.

RSM has 90% reinvestment, but first dividend will be 100% paid.

There's also Nasty Fans, hashing at 420 GH/s as of right now - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nastyfans-the-bitcoin-enthusiast-fan-club-est-2012-86854
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 01:25:26 PM
#12
RSM's dividend history is empty. I don't recall their contract, but I don't believe it's 100%. I think they're focused on growth.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 01:20:04 PM
#11
I have added the dividend/reinvestment policy.

You guys have to help me out a little, because I did not follow all asset threads.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
cryptoshark
September 10, 2013, 12:50:25 PM
#10
You're missing the funniest one, ActiveMining.

yeah, 6 avalons

but Ken promised 4 TH in half of August Smiley

LOL
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
September 10, 2013, 12:48:25 PM
#9
In good times when blades was for 75BTC sales of hardware triples mining. Now it not even doubles. It's clearly visible that AM is now over valuated.

I normally would not respond to FUD as this, especially in a thread where it should not even be, but FC stated clearly that much of the current HW sales profits were being diverted to GEN2 products. Those profits are still outpacing mining revenue, we simply are not seeing them in the dividends at the moment.
legendary
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2013, 12:43:50 PM
#8
In good times when blades was for 75BTC sales of hardware triples mining. Now it not even doubles. It's clearly visible that AM is now over valuated.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 12:39:51 PM
#7
Nice work, it's simple and easy to interpret.

My only critique would be that dividends must be included in some form to make reasonable comparisons as it's a crucial component when choosing between mining assets. It doesn't matter what a particular company's hash rate is if they're keeping all the funds and the share price is not appreciating(or is declining) as share holders would be unable to unlock that increased value anyway.

I'd suggest, rather than getting into the weeds attempting to project forward dividends or APY which is obviously dependent on many factors, you instead offer a simple indicator of what portion of mining revenue is paid out as dividends. ie xx% of hashes are dispersed as dividends. bASIC-Mining pays out 70% of mining revenue on a daily basis.

Cheers.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 12:20:08 PM
#6
Useful sheet. Could you add the market cap next to the share price?

What is the value of a market cap addition?

Share volatility?
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 547
September 10, 2013, 12:17:11 PM
#5
Useful sheet. Could you add the market cap next to the share price?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
September 10, 2013, 12:06:29 PM
#4
What does Mh/btc stands for?

Edit, i got it ...

 megash/btc ... the higher it is  , higher is the efficiency?

Yes.

But that's a too simple analysis. Some of the companies listed in the spreadsheet also sell hardware, the profits of which are distributed to investors as well. Furthermore, future hashrates are just a prediction and the actual results may vary wildly.
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
September 10, 2013, 12:03:28 PM
#3
What does Mh/btc stands for?

Edit, i got it ...

 megash/btc ... the higher it is  , higher is the efficiency?
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
September 10, 2013, 10:47:28 AM
#2
Although this is extremely useful now, this would be mega useful if it included dividend information.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 10:41:24 AM
#1
UPDATE 5/11/2011

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AljXEOuLsvIqdFRuSlV1eTFjWWhhaUI0ODhHOUV4X3c#gid=0

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello guys,


I have made a google doc with the comparison between the Bitcoin mining assets.

You can find it here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AljXEOuLsvIqdFRuSlV1eTFjWWhhaUI0ODhHOUV4X3c#gid=0

Can you guys help me complete (correct) it?


Much appreciated!
Jump to: