Pages:
Author

Topic: Competitive analysis of Bitcoin vs Square, SumUp, iZettle, Payleven (Read 12417 times)

brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
This is a great article i love it, have bookmarked it. Thank you.
Best Regards - https://www.nnortoncomsetup.com
brand new
Activity: 0
Merit: 0
Useful info:

Fees and Pricing
The iZettle reader is incredibly easy to use and quick to set up. Also, it has some of the lowest charges in the entire payment provider industry. Here is a breakdown of some iZettle pricing:
iZettle reader: £59 + VAT, one-time cost.
Transaction fees: 1.75%
Setup fee: £0
Monthly fee: £0, though there is an optional GO PLUS service for £20 a month
PoS App: Free
On-Phone Support: Free
Daily Reporting: Free

Quoted from the Company Compare's iZettle Review Article 
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Huh, does anyone know why Barclays processes payments for this service only during Kenyan working hours? That seems bizarre even by the low standards of the banking industry. Why Kenya, of all places?

Most likely that's boilerplate text supplied by Barclays' legal department, which at some past date was borrowed and customized for use by their Kenyan subsidiary, and then never proofread or search-replaced by the developers who subsequently reused it for the UK site.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129
Thanks for the info BitPay and DublinBrian.

Do you know anything more about this Square encryption? Magstripes aren't exactly hard to duplicate, I don't see why encryption between the dongle and the phone would make any difference at all to how easy cloning is. That sounds like security theater to me.

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Mike,

Square got in trouble early on because their magnetic stripe readers had NO ENCRYPTION between the reader and the phone.  Since magnetic stripes have extra security features, this little dongle quickly became a thief's best friend to creating cloned cards.

The readers are now encrypted.

At CES back in January I would say about half of our visitors had come to our booth after they had visited Square.  Our ability to do international payments and ecommerce payments are a big plus. The dongle is meant for small, retail businesses.  For card-not-present transactions, Square charges 3.5% plus 15 cents.

The killer app for bitcoin is definitely in the internet payment space.  All these guys will trip over each other fighting for the little retailer.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
I may be wrong but I was under the impression that the reason was because most of the patents for the chip are owned by european companies (Gemalto aka Gemplus). For example, smartcards with chips in them were being used for phone booths when I visited France in the 1989.
It may be true but those smart cards were already licensed around the world, and the US also uses smartcards in many places (GSM network SIM cards, DirecTV cards, etc). I don't think smart card patents explains it.
Mobile operators in the USA vigorously resisted GSM adoption until many years after it had become a global standard. They continued with their own mobile standards like IS-136 until the late 2000s.

Similarly the US government resisted the use of the european smartcard chips in passports, and insisted on contactless RFID instead, for which they controlled the patents.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
These are all protocols and payment schemes controlled by one particular company or institution.

As such they aren't even remotely competing to Bitcoin. One of THE fundamental advantages of Bitcoin is its decentralized, independent, open, uncontrolled, unhackable, transparent, free-from-manipulation nature.

legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
Any system that involves physical credit cards with custom readers is in a way no competitor to bitcoin but there are systems like "Barclays Pingit" in the works (much cooler actually Wink ). I know of one (not sure if there is anything official yet) but I'm sure there are hundreds. It's just natural to take that step.

There is a notion that Bitcoin is good proxy currency because of it's openness it can connect to any other payment system. I think the only other universal way to go between two networks is by using banking system e.g. wire transfer, which is painful.

The Banking System does not work between arbitrary national currencies. You can't send money from USA to IR.
sr. member
Activity: 269
Merit: 250
3. Payments must be made in sterling, and an exchange rate (Link opens in a new window) will be applied when funds are converted to the local currency. Payments made on a working day will be processed immediately, if made between 8am and 5pm Kenyan time (excluding weekends and Kenyan public holidays), and the funds will be received the same day if the transfer is made before 5pm Kenyan time. Payments made after 5pm Kenyan time, or on a non-working day, will arrive the next working day.

Huh, does anyone know why Barclays processes payments for this service only during Kenyan working hours? That seems bizarre even by the low standards of the banking industry. Why Kenya, of all places?

Just a guess that there is some manual verification involved and it's done in Kenyan office.


What we have is a growing multitude of incompatible propriety systems that don't and never will talk to each other. It is like an AOL user trying to communicate with a Compuserve user in 1989.

I don't disagree but note that Bitcoin, being just "one more system" from the perspective of the user, doesn't solve that.

It might solve it one day if the "one more system" takes over, as the internet took over from AOL and CompuServe, and that's an analogy I have used in the past to talk about Bitcoin (open systems beating closed, etc). I think it's very apt.

There is a notion that Bitcoin is good proxy currency because of it's openness it can connect to any other payment system. I think the only other universal way to go between two networks is by using banking system e.g. wire transfer, which is painful.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
Here is my question: Suppose I am using a WalletBit wallet and the merchant is using one of your competitors let say BitPay, How does it work? 

It works fine, it is all based on Bitcoin.

Of course it does. It generates a bitcoin:URI with the bitcoin address and amount in an open standard that is understood across bitcoin clients worldwide including those of competitors. Just like email. Therein lies the Bitcoin's fundamental advantage over the competition.

Now how do I convert Interac (Canada) to M-Pesa (Kenya) again?
legendary
Activity: 1002
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
Bitcoin seems far better than those competitors on several aspect.  The only thing I see, is that Bitcoin adoption is in it's infancy, when bitcoin adoption will start to kick in, watch out !!
donator
Activity: 640
Merit: 500
Here is my question: Suppose I am using a WalletBit wallet and the merchant is using one of your competitors let say BitPay, How does it work? 

It works fine, it is all based on Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
Nice post indeed. But yes, this is the area we as a bitcoin payment processor want in on "Cleaning up the mess?".

         Paying for stuff                Receiving Payment





Here is my question: Suppose I am using a WalletBit wallet and the merchant is using one of your competitors let say BitPay, How does it work? 
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129
... And the same sorts of secure chips EMV uses can be applied to Bitcoin to allow untrusted fully offline trades, should that ever be in demand. ...

How would that work?

The chip generates private keys within itself and does not allow them to be exported (in the clear - encrypted backups could be allowed). It stores and signs transactions as any wallet would. The user interface might be provided by a special purpose device, or the chip can be integrated with smartphones.

However it works, when the chip signs a Bitcoin transaction using wallet keys, it also signs the transaction with a private key that was issued to the chip at manufacturing time. The purchaser can then provide the signed Bitcoin transaction, chip-specific signature over that transaction and the certificate chain proving that it's a genuine chip, all sent to the seller who then verifies all the signatures. If they match, you know the Bitcoin transaction was created by a chip that won't allow double spends to be created.

Given that modern smartcard security is extremely strong, this gives you a good level of confidence in the Bitcoin transaction. You don't have to broadcast it to the network immediately. You can broadcast it whenever is convenient, secure in the knowledge that the buyers don't have any technical way to create double spends.

In reality, custom chips+devices for this is probably too hard and not the way to go. Trusted computing (ARM TrustZone et al) can provide similar assurances, without the need to design custom chips. It can all be done in software because the boot processes are strictly controlled and keys can be encrypted under the fingerprints of specific execution environments.


I may be wrong but I was under the impression that the reason was because most of the patents for the chip are owned by european companies (Gemalto aka Gemplus). For example, smartcards with chips in them were being used for phone booths when I visited France in the 1989.

It may be true but those smart cards were already licensed around the world, and the US also uses smartcards in many places (GSM network SIM cards, DirecTV cards, etc). I don't think smart card patents explains it.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129
3. Payments must be made in sterling, and an exchange rate (Link opens in a new window) will be applied when funds are converted to the local currency. Payments made on a working day will be processed immediately, if made between 8am and 5pm Kenyan time (excluding weekends and Kenyan public holidays), and the funds will be received the same day if the transfer is made before 5pm Kenyan time. Payments made after 5pm Kenyan time, or on a non-working day, will arrive the next working day.

Huh, does anyone know why Barclays processes payments for this service only during Kenyan working hours? That seems bizarre even by the low standards of the banking industry. Why Kenya, of all places?

What we have is a growing multitude of incompatible propriety systems that don't and never will talk to each other. It is like an AOL user trying to communicate with a Compuserve user in 1989.

I don't disagree but note that Bitcoin, being just "one more system" from the perspective of the user, doesn't solve that.

It might solve it one day if the "one more system" takes over, as the internet took over from AOL and CompuServe, and that's an analogy I have used in the past to talk about Bitcoin (open systems beating closed, etc). I think it's very apt.
donator
Activity: 640
Merit: 500
Nice post indeed. But yes, this is the area we as a bitcoin payment processor want in on "Cleaning up the mess?".

         Paying for stuff                Receiving Payment



legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
These national / regional money transfer systems have one very serious problem.
We have:

Person A in Kenya using M-Pesa
Person B in the UK using Barclays Pingit
Person C in Canada using Interac

So how do payments from between A and B, B and C, or A and C work again?  But we just got started, we have also:

PayPal
Dwolla
Liberty Reserve
UKash
Paxum
PerfectMoney

...

etc etc.

What we have is a growing multitude of incompatible propriety systems that don't and never will talk to each other. It is like an AOL user trying to communicate with a Compuserve user in 1989.
sr. member
Activity: 269
Merit: 250
The solutions the OP describes are just connecting phones to the existing payment card infrastructure. I believe that model will be superceded by  banks developing their own smartphone payment apps and services. Visa and Mastercard may lose marketshare as a result.

Barclays Pingit in the UK, is one example. Neither the purchaser nor the merchant need a credit card account. You run an app on your smartphone that is linked to your bank account. You open the app, type the recipients phone number and click send. Quick and easy.

These payment apps will be heavily restricted to what they can do. Pingit has limits on amounts you can send. Banks and governments dont want people moving millions of dollars around by phone. So bitcoin will always have an advantage in that regard.

Barclays Pingit has a lot of limitations written in fine print, and those are consistant with the way how banks operate right now. So they are trying to enable mobile payments on top of existing business practice without changing it, and it will not work right away, it will take years before something like Barclays Pingit becomes competitive for general purpose transactions.

Important information
1. Terms and conditions apply. You must have a UK current account and be aged 16 or over to use Barclays Pingit. You can download the app and register to send and receive payments but if you bank elsewhere, we can set up a Barclays Pingit Wallet account for you to use. You can also register online (Link opens in a new window) to only receive payments.
 
Payments in sterling. Minimum payment of £1, the daily payment limit is £750 and the daily receiving limit is £5000. If you have received any payments, you must register within 24 hours or these will be cancelled.
 
The Barclays Pingit app only works with Android 2.2 and above, iOS 4.2 and above and BlackBerry OS 5.0 and above. You may be charged by your service provider for mobile or internet use. Business customers on certain tariffs will be charged for transactions. We can refuse to register you for Barclays Pingit or place limits on how you use it. Visit Barclays Pingit for Business customers for more information.
 
2. Subject to available funds. When sending money, you must ensure the recipients mobile number is current and correct otherwise the payment may be returned or made to the wrong person.  We won’t be liable to you if the money is sent to the wrong person as a result but we will try to recover the money which is our standard practice.
 
Barclays Features Store – terms and conditions apply. You can use the Barclays Features Store online, in branch or by calling us, to add a Feature or Pack to a Barclays Bank Account or Premier Current Account. Packs are available for a monthly fee. You may need to register or apply for certain Features. These may also incur separate fees or charges. The Barclays Features Store cannot be used for certain accounts. For more information and to read the terms and conditions visit featuresstore.barclays.co.uk
 
3. Payments must be made in sterling, and an exchange rate (Link opens in a new window) will be applied when funds are converted to the local currency. Payments made on a working day will be processed immediately, if made between 8am and 5pm Kenyan time (excluding weekends and Kenyan public holidays), and the funds will be received the same day if the transfer is made before 5pm Kenyan time. Payments made after 5pm Kenyan time, or on a non-working day, will arrive the next working day.
 
4. Barclays does not charge you for this Service. An exchange rate will be applied when funds are converted from sterling to the local currency. You may incur charges by your service provider for internet usage.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
Quote from: Mike Hearn
This leads to the question of why the USA is so far behind Europe in payment card security. Though EMV has been deployed for years across many different countries, deployment in the US has barely begun. The answer may lie in the structure of the card industry.
I may be wrong but I was under the impression that the reason was because most of the patents for the chip are owned by european companies (Gemalto aka Gemplus). For example, smartcards with chips in them were being used for phone booths when I visited France in the 1989.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
The solutions the OP describes are just connecting phones to the existing payment card infrastructure. I believe that model will be superceded by  banks developing their own smartphone payment apps and services. Visa and Mastercard may lose marketshare as a result.

Barclays Pingit in the UK, is one example. Neither the purchaser nor the merchant need a credit card account. You run an app on your smartphone that is linked to your bank account. You open the app, type the recipients phone number and click send. Quick and easy.

These payment apps will be heavily restricted to what they can do. Pingit has limits on amounts you can send. Banks and governments dont want people moving millions of dollars around by phone. So bitcoin will always have an advantage in that regard.

Pages:
Jump to: