It's sorted based on the highest ranked oldest? DT1's trust list in which they appear. The DT1s are sorted based on account age.
The first 34 entries are all included on theymos' trust list. The next 32 (from 35 - 66) are on gmaxwell's trust list. The next 17 (67 - 83) are on phantastisch's trust list. And so on. It obviously doesn't display duplicates. It also doesn't matter if a user is trusted or distrusted by the DT1 member in question - if they are anywhere on their trust list, they will be grouped under that user. For example, Gavin Andresen is number 36, under gmaxwell's group, despite being excluded by gmaxwell.
Thanks, I hadn't looked into it, but this makes a lot of sense. I'll quote you in the OP.
I edited your quote, do you agree?I used the same order as used on
Trust settings, I'm not sure what it's based on.
- In my opinion, a threshold at 25 merit over last year is minimum one to judge quality of DT2 member. The threshold should be higher, 50 or 100. I would prefer to choose the threshold at 100 earned merits.
This is too high considering the threshold for DT1 is only 10 merit. I think either 10 for both, or perhaps 25 or 50 for DT1 and 10 for DT2 would be reasonable.
I'd say 2 inclusions from DT2 would help a lot. DT1 needs at least 10 votes from users with earned Merit, so 2 votes from DT1 isn't that much to ask for.
- It might be good if you can make a list of only DT2 member whom did not earn a signed merit so far, rather than a mixture like current list. It is ridiculous when a real DT2 member has not been able to earn a single merit so far, especially if still being actively in the forum last year.
Wait for it.........
