Pages:
Author

Topic: [CONCEPT] Solution for IPOs : Proof of Person - Equal Stake - page 2. (Read 1573 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
Proof of Person - Equal Stake is a proposed solution for the problem of Greed and Envy during the startup of second generation crypto currencies:

Even though technically some of the second generation cryptocurrencies have turned out to be exciting technical successes, many of the recent projects that featured pre-mined ‘Proof of Stake’ concept currencies - NXT, Qora, and now also NEM -  have been plagued by the perception that the process of starting up the currency is not fair, but hampered by greed and envy.

I do acknowledge that greed and envy may have a useful role to play in society, but I have the suspicion that in the case of establishing buy-in and confidence into a currency, it would be more likely to succeed if the currency is perceived as fair, and of a steady value.


Initial axioms:

1. Distribution has to be fair, not only at a certain point in time, but for all future generations.

2. Every living, adult human should have equal access to the currency.


Proposed mechanism of distribution:

3. Every living, adult human should receive one free stake of currency, once in their life, with the opening of their account.

4. The opening of a new account is the occasion when new coins are forged or ‘mined’. That process might be drawn over a period of time, for instance over one year, in order to average the received value and also to introduce the newling to the concept of currency.

5. Opening of a new account is supervised by multiple existing mature accounts, called bankers, by vouching for the Proof of Person:

6. Biometric identification of sorts as well as two forms of traditional identification are hashed into or included with the account number.



The benefit of such a system might be that the value of the currency would not fluctuate that much over time, because essentially you are having IPO’s year round, and the ratio of coins to individual is maintained.

This concept of distribution can be applied to any other 100% Proof of Stake design.

Clearly the rewards for maintaining nodes, the network and incentives for development can co-exist along the Proof of Person - Equal Stake concept.

Pentamon



I am thinking about that since months now, but didn't post, because there will be people using half ready concepts and destroy the possiblity at the beginning. Because the first time you can maybe reach people. If it was somehow wrong the second time you bother them already. And the 3rd time is only spam.

I think its too early for it. I have also a few concepts for it, thinking a little further with privacy, but they are all not really useable yet.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Quote
Proof of Person

Death of privacy.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
proof of person?i dont mean
hero member
Activity: 678
Merit: 500
It is a great idea,really something new.

I support the project and will keep eyes on it.

Good luck ,dev.

 Smiley
hero member
Activity: 619
Merit: 500
Go Bitcoin
watching!! interested!!!
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
(Optional concepts:
The account of a person goes through life stages:
Initially in the first year, the coins are mined, then after another year, the account matures into a banker, provided there is a certain proof of use in that account: activity and a positive balance.
Every human should receive one stake of currency, that is ‘colored’ similar to an unique asset. These coins are going to move through the big pool during the life of the individual, but they sort of want to magnetically move back to the originator. Once the person dies, the coins start to wither away… essentially dying with the person.)

Pentamon
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Proof of Person - Equal Stake is a proposed solution for the problem of Greed and Envy during the startup of second generation crypto currencies:

Even though technically some of the second generation cryptocurrencies have turned out to be exciting technical successes, many of the recent projects that featured pre-mined ‘Proof of Stake’ concept currencies - NXT, Qora, and now also NEM -  have been plagued by the perception that the process of starting up the currency is not fair, but hampered by greed and envy.

I do acknowledge that greed and envy may have a useful role to play in society, but I have the suspicion that in the case of establishing buy-in and confidence into a currency, it would be more likely to succeed if the currency is perceived as fair, and of a steady value.


Initial axioms:

1. Distribution has to be fair, not only at a certain point in time, but for all future generations.

2. Every living, adult human should have equal access to the currency.


Proposed mechanism of distribution:

3. Every living, adult human should receive one free stake of currency, once in their life, with the opening of their account.

4. The opening of a new account is the occasion when new coins are forged or ‘mined’. That process might be drawn over a period of time, for instance over one year, in order to average the received value and also to introduce the newling to the concept of currency.

5. Opening of a new account is supervised by multiple existing mature accounts, called bankers, by vouching for the Proof of Person:

6. Biometric identification of sorts as well as two forms of traditional identification are hashed into or included with the account number.



The benefit of such a system might be that the value of the currency would not fluctuate that much over time, because essentially you are having IPO’s year round, and the ratio of coins to individual is maintained.

This concept of distribution can be applied to any other 100% Proof of Stake design.

Clearly the rewards for maintaining nodes, the network and incentives for development can co-exist along the Proof of Person - Equal Stake concept.

Pentamon

Pages:
Jump to: