Pages:
Author

Topic: Concern? over 50% of miners controlled by two pools - page 3. (Read 3534 times)

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
It is not a good thing that is for sure.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Any of the major pools with cap themselves if they even got close. BTCGuild has had to do that a few times. Nothing to worry about unless they suddenly announce a merger.

what if the same guy already owns them both ?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Any of the major pools with cap themselves if they even got close. BTCGuild has had to do that a few times. Nothing to worry about unless they suddenly announce a merger.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Because it makes it easier to pull off a 51% attack?
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
No, it is not a concern.  Why?  Are you concerned?  If so, can you explain exactly why you are?
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Should we be concerned that over 50% of the mining power is controlled by two pools? https://blockchain.info/pools

This seems like a really bad concentration of power for a network that is supposed to be decentralized.  Sure, it's handy when you need to fix a bug in the system, but it's also a weak point that can be exploited.  Thoughts?
Pages:
Jump to: