Pages:
Author

Topic: Conservative Bigots Heckle Muslim Americans Attempting to Sing National Anthem (Read 1844 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
The funny thing is that the Jihadists agree with these guys. It is the moderate, educated Muslims who threaten Al-Qaeda and Dasch. Those bigoted protestor-hillbillies are a lot like the Jihadists and would get along smartly. Just as civilized people would get along with the Muslims who want peace. 

Man, you really, really, really do not know hillbillies.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1145
The revolution will be monetized!
The funny thing is that the Jihadists agree with these guys. It is the moderate, educated Muslims who threaten Al-Qaeda and Dasch. Those bigoted protestor-hillbillies are a lot like the Jihadists and would get along smartly. Just as civilized people would get along with the Muslims who want peace. 
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386

I know I was right.
If you don't click, you are not a bait.
I like kisses, fake or not, so thank you.

The big question is: How can we progressively change the mind of all those conservative bigots regarding our muslim american brothers? We know that will take years. We need to find a faster solution...

Um, you mean we should stop thinking they are a bunch of racist intolerant homophobic fascist woman-beaters like the norm in the countries they come (or fled) from?

Probably has some truth in it, that statement.

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.


a-fake-smile-can-be-bad-for-your-health


New research suggests that putting on a fake smile to mask your unhappiness or displeasure may have unexpected consequences. It can actually worsen your mood and cause you to withdraw from tasks.

Scientists examined what happened when people engaged in fake smiling, an activity also known as "surface acting." They also examined what happened when the same people engaged in "deep acting," a genuine smile. On days when smiles were forced, the participants' moods got worse and they tended to withdraw from work.

The New York Times reports:

"Trying to suppress negative thoughts, it turns out, may have made those thoughts even more persistent ... Women were affected more than men."

Stay healthy my friend

 Cool



What does the research say about typing "hahaha" to indicate actual laughter occurred?  Grin

Fake is the opposite of actual. I knew no actual "hahahah" happened when it was typed. It is better for the soul to say what we feel...

 Smiley (I am actually smiling)


You're right, it was an actual "hahaha". The unintentionally irony of someone complaining about me changing their quote with a FTFY device was literally laugh-out-loud funny. I guess you better stick to what you actually know, because your insights have proven as accurate as the conservative click bait you post.    Kiss  <--- Not an actual kiss.

I know I was right.
If you don't click, you are not a bait.
I like kisses, fake or not, so thank you.

The big question is: How can we progressively change the mind of all those conservative bigots regarding our muslim american brothers? We know that will take years. We need to find a faster solution...




legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.


a-fake-smile-can-be-bad-for-your-health


New research suggests that putting on a fake smile to mask your unhappiness or displeasure may have unexpected consequences. It can actually worsen your mood and cause you to withdraw from tasks.

Scientists examined what happened when people engaged in fake smiling, an activity also known as "surface acting." They also examined what happened when the same people engaged in "deep acting," a genuine smile. On days when smiles were forced, the participants' moods got worse and they tended to withdraw from work.

The New York Times reports:

"Trying to suppress negative thoughts, it turns out, may have made those thoughts even more persistent ... Women were affected more than men."

Stay healthy my friend

 Cool



What does the research say about typing "hahaha" to indicate actual laughter occurred?  Grin

Fake is the opposite of actual. I knew no actual "hahahah" happened when it was typed. It is better for the soul to say what we feel...

 Smiley (I am actually smiling)


You're right, it was an actual "hahaha". The unintentionally irony of someone complaining about me changing their quote with a FTFY device was literally laugh-out-loud funny. I guess you better stick to what you actually know, because your insights have proven as accurate as the conservative click bait you post.    Kiss  <--- Not an actual kiss.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.


a-fake-smile-can-be-bad-for-your-health


New research suggests that putting on a fake smile to mask your unhappiness or displeasure may have unexpected consequences. It can actually worsen your mood and cause you to withdraw from tasks.

Scientists examined what happened when people engaged in fake smiling, an activity also known as "surface acting." They also examined what happened when the same people engaged in "deep acting," a genuine smile. On days when smiles were forced, the participants' moods got worse and they tended to withdraw from work.

The New York Times reports:

"Trying to suppress negative thoughts, it turns out, may have made those thoughts even more persistent ... Women were affected more than men."

Stay healthy my friend

 Cool



What does the research say about typing "hahaha" to indicate actual laughter occurred?  Grin



Fake is the opposite of actual. I knew no actual "hahahah" happened when it was typed. It is better for the soul to say what we feel...

 Smiley (I am actually smiling)



legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.


a-fake-smile-can-be-bad-for-your-health


New research suggests that putting on a fake smile to mask your unhappiness or displeasure may have unexpected consequences. It can actually worsen your mood and cause you to withdraw from tasks.

Scientists examined what happened when people engaged in fake smiling, an activity also known as "surface acting." They also examined what happened when the same people engaged in "deep acting," a genuine smile. On days when smiles were forced, the participants' moods got worse and they tended to withdraw from work.

The New York Times reports:

"Trying to suppress negative thoughts, it turns out, may have made those thoughts even more persistent ... Women were affected more than men."

Stay healthy my friend

 Cool



What does the research say about typing "hahaha" to indicate actual laughter occurred?  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.
Nope.  All you have to do is point to specific, black letter paragraphs of Sharia that conflict with the US Constitution and or the Bill of Rights.  And there are bunches of those.  There's a valid concern that someone/some group in the USA would attempt to create enclaves with laws different than the basic Constitutional rights.

Likely the best known example of this is polygamy.  Sharia says a man can marry four women.  Minnesota says no. 

State wins.

No, there is exactly zero concern that some group in the USA would attempt to create enclaves with laws different than the basic Constitutional rights, because the only entities that can create laws are the government. Some wacko cult/religion passes a "law"? It has zero binding on American citizens.

As you've already demonstrated with your example on polygamy, actual laws trump religious rules. You've actually just proven my point that anti-Sharia law is redundant because actual law already governs.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.


a-fake-smile-can-be-bad-for-your-health


New research suggests that putting on a fake smile to mask your unhappiness or displeasure may have unexpected consequences. It can actually worsen your mood and cause you to withdraw from tasks.

Scientists examined what happened when people engaged in fake smiling, an activity also known as "surface acting." They also examined what happened when the same people engaged in "deep acting," a genuine smile. On days when smiles were forced, the participants' moods got worse and they tended to withdraw from work.

The New York Times reports:

"Trying to suppress negative thoughts, it turns out, may have made those thoughts even more persistent ... Women were affected more than men."

Stay healthy my friend

 Cool




legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.
Nope.  All you have to do is point to specific, black letter paragraphs of Sharia that conflict with the US Constitution and or the Bill of Rights.  And there are bunches of those.  There's a valid concern that someone/some group in the USA would attempt to create enclaves with laws different than the basic Constitutional rights.

Likely the best known example of this is polygamy.  Sharia says a man can marry four women.  Minnesota says no. 

State wins.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought.  

Hahaha, mate, I pointed out plainly I was changing the quote. FTFY = Fixed That For You. It's used to indicate someone altered a quote to make it more accurate. In this case, I was making it reflect reality. You missed the joke. The point was you're stating as fact something that isn't.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

See, my point is they're not protesting CAIR. They don't reference CAIR in signs or speech. They are protesting a gathering of Muslims. That's why they're bigots, as evidenced by the definition you quoted.

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

The woman was not invited to speak at the podium. She is using someone else's equipment without permission, which is inherently a use of force. To the extent anyone responds to take the property that does not belong to her away, it's self defense. They didn't deny her speech, they denied her access to their property. She was perfectly free to shout her hate speech without their microphone, but she wanted to make sure she was the center of attention. Mission accomplished!

Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.

Anti-sharia legislation is redundant on the grounds that the government can't enforce any religion in the first place, or the laws any religion has. Any law that attempts to tell a religious community what rules can govern its own religion is unconstitutional, whether it be sharia law with arbitrary rules for Muslims within the Islamic faith, or the arbitrary Christian rules they impose upon themselves.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
And here's one of the counter protesters not interfering with the event to spread her very unbigoted message:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpuhYSyb8yY

I said this...
   
The simple fact is that CAIR, a known terrorist organization, organized an event at the Texas Capitol and they got called on it, in a counter protest.  The signs are actually kind of funny-

You changed it to this...

Quote from: Spendulus on January 31, 2015, 10:01:37 PM
The simple fact is that CAIR, a commonly alleged terrorist organization by conservative and christian groups, organized an event at the Texas Capitol, which sparked a counter protest by christian and conservative activists.

But you changed what I said without indicating that you had done so.  Would have been nice if you'd just indicated you were making a change to what you thought. 

Because I wasn't talking about it being so called by conservative groups.

Somehow you seem convinced the counter protesters are "bigots".   But I am not seeing the evidence of that.  It's simply hard to dislike CAIR, a known terrorist organization, and be a bigot, you see.

From Wikipedia-
Bigotry is a state of mind where a person strongly, obstinately, irrationally, unfairly or intolerantly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

OK.  Now let's go to your "evidence."

This shows the blond lady talking, and the microphone being rudely taken away from here.
How very rude!  She didn't push or shove anyone, and they denied her freedom of speech!

Let's look at what you asserted in post #2:

This vitriolic rhetoric cannot be left unchecked because the sentiments displayed informs policies that directly impact American Muslims (as well as other faith communities). Anti-sharia legislation has been introduced in 32 states, and these unconstitutional laws, which prohibit the free expression of religion, have actually passed in multiple states – including North Carolina, Alabama and Arizona.



Now this is pretty weird.  Anti-sharia legislation is certainly constitutional.  But to you, apparently it is the reverse?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
And here's one of the counter protesters not interfering with the event to spread her very unbigoted message:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpuhYSyb8yY
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
Any group of Muslims is welcome to come to the Texas Capitol and do whatever they want, and if they start by emphasizing sincerely that they do not support violence, I am certain that even groups that came there to protest would be very impressed.

Nothing more American than gathering to sing the national anthem and talk about getting more people involved in government. The Christian bigots there were determined to not let that happen. Your certainty that a group of bigots would keep an open mind is unconvincing. The picture of the crusaders says it all:



What a fine group of open-minded individuals these must be!
Hmm....

Are you implying that this was not a LEGAL counter protest?  It doesn't matter what their signs say, actually I find them somewhat funny.

Your argument is full of exaggeration and innuendo, isn't it?

The Christian bigots
a group of bigots
picture of the crusaders


The simple fact is that CAIR, a known terrorist organization, organized an event at the Texas Capitol and they got called on it, in a counter protest.  The signs are actually kind of funny-

radical islam is the new nazi
us border -you are entering a sharia free zone
go home and take obama with you


Nobody was arrested, so I'm not seeing any significant interference existed.  

Unless you are also going to suggest the Capitol police were in on the conspiracy?

1) Never implied anything about illegal counter protest; the counter protest is perfectly legal I'm assuming on the basis that no protest should ever be illegal. I'm just remarking on the disgrace of a bunch of bigots who are proud of how bigoted they are.
2) These people aren't protesting CAIR. They're protesting Muslims. The signs make it plain exactly who their target is, and why they're protesting. Note the total lack of mentions of CAIR, in fact, I'd be surprised if any of those yokels pictured even know what CAIR stands for. They're just proud to be there doing the lord's work of yelling at people with a different god than them.
3) Apparently in your world, the interference of an event is only evidenced by arrests. How drole!
4) My argument is full of innuendo, yes, and plenty of judgment. But exaggeration, no. Bigots gonna bigot, and I'm gonna call them on it, because they're a disgrace to this country. But you're perfectly free to continue defending the bottom feeders as noble folk. After all, if they didn't have the admiration of like-minded folks somewhere, they might be shamed into being decent, or at least quiet.

The simple fact is that CAIR, a commonly alleged terrorist organization by conservative and christian groups, organized an event at the Texas Capitol, which sparked a counter protest by christian and conservative activists.
FTFY

Btw, the signs are funny, but probably not in the way you think, and more of a I can't believe there are actually people who are so misguided kinda way. That woman on the right... classic conservative!

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
Any group of Muslims is welcome to come to the Texas Capitol and do whatever they want, and if they start by emphasizing sincerely that they do not support violence, I am certain that even groups that came there to protest would be very impressed.

Nothing more American than gathering to sing the national anthem and talk about getting more people involved in government. The Christian bigots there were determined to not let that happen. Your certainty that a group of bigots would keep an open mind is unconvincing. The picture of the crusaders says it all:



What a fine group of open-minded individuals these must be!
Hmm....

Are you implying that this was not a LEGAL counter protest?  It doesn't matter what their signs say, actually I find them somewhat funny.

Your argument is full of exaggeration and innuendo, isn't it?

The Christian bigots
a group of bigots
picture of the crusaders


The simple fact is that CAIR, a known terrorist organization, organized an event at the Texas Capitol and they got called on it, in a counter protest.  The signs are actually kind of funny-

radical islam is the new nazi
us border -you are entering a sharia free zone
go home and take obama with you


Nobody was arrested, so I'm not seeing any significant interference existed. 

Unless you are also going to suggest the Capitol police were in on the conspiracy?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
Any group of Muslims is welcome to come to the Texas Capitol and do whatever they want, and if they start by emphasizing sincerely that they do not support violence, I am certain that even groups that came there to protest would be very impressed.

Nothing more American than gathering to sing the national anthem and talk about getting more people involved in government. The Christian bigots there were determined to not let that happen. Your certainty that a group of bigots would keep an open mind is unconvincing. The picture of the crusaders says it all:



What a fine group of open-minded individuals these must be!
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Oh please, I don't trust either of them, as people accuse Matriarchs ( fake feminists ) of being, these groups are professional victims and they do an excellent job of getting powerful people on their side because of it.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
Christians still believe in all sorts of medieval and intolerant bullshit, they are hardly in the right as much as Muslims, the thing that pisses me off the most about all of this is that we're supposed to fucking respect people who are a bunch of intolerent cunts and often act on it, I'm not talking about protesting but the active subversion of the law and the murder of people they disagree with. Sure, you rant about homosexuality being a sin and the earth being 5000 years old or how women shouldn't be allowed to do anything without a man's permission, but if you act on it and try to enforce your doctrine out in the real world then you and I will have a problem.
That's not me, since I'm an atheist.  Mostly.

But I think what you are saying is that both Xtians and Mussies pretty much piss you off?

Yup, it's like watching Republicans and Democrats try to blame each other for fucking up their country.
Just for kicks and grins, you might want to check out if a full copy of this supposed confrontation is available, then evaluate if it is a contrived and false news story intended to portray the CAIR group as the victims.

You might be being played like a fiddle.

Manipulating public views was about all Yassir Arafat even did well....
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Christians still believe in all sorts of medieval and intolerant bullshit, they are hardly in the right as much as Muslims, the thing that pisses me off the most about all of this is that we're supposed to fucking respect people who are a bunch of intolerent cunts and often act on it, I'm not talking about protesting but the active subversion of the law and the murder of people they disagree with. Sure, you rant about homosexuality being a sin and the earth being 5000 years old or how women shouldn't be allowed to do anything without a man's permission, but if you act on it and try to enforce your doctrine out in the real world then you and I will have a problem.
That's not me, since I'm an atheist.  Mostly.

But I think what you are saying is that both Xtians and Mussies pretty much piss you off?

Yup, it's like watching Republicans and Democrats try to blame each other for fucking up their country.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386

They [christians] are stupid enough to play their["radical islam"] game, ostracize normal muslins so it becomes easy for these groups["radical islam"] to recruit. Same thing in France...

BY this logic a Christian values group protesting outside a strip club would cause more girls to become strippers.

And a Christian group protesting against inadequate fire trucks and funding for a city would cause more fires.

This is about as much about "tolerance" as Islam is about "peace."

Let's correct the thread title, okay?

Conservatives Protest Terrorist Organization, CAIR, holding meeting at Texas Capitol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMEVpP7DT9E


Here: http://boingboing.net/2015/01/08/sharpening-the-contradictions.html
That's a very perceptive article and does in fact illustrate a primary method of muslims, which is to evoke their appearance as victims.  I note in going through Youtubes, that they did this 2 years ago at the Texas Capital.  So we should expect it on a regular basis.

Any group of Muslims is welcome to come to the Texas Capitol and do whatever they want, and if they start by emphasizing sincerely that they do not support violence, I am certain that even groups that came there to protest would be very impressed.

But....they won't....
Pages:
Jump to: