Topic: Conservatives/Republicans should be banned from America - page 2. (Read 1616 times)

It may be vice versa - indigenous society will assimilate into immigrants' culture. If the are a lot of insane conservatives in midland US, you can dilute them with massive influx of immigrants from poorer liberal countries.

It seems to me that mixing the indigenous population with immigrants is a bad idea. Migrants need to assimilate into society and then they will become full members. Otherwise it will be a constant conflict in society.

No, they should not be banned.
But we should mix them with even more immigrants, with LGBT people, with feminists, with liberals and democrats and so on.
Sometimes life experiences are quite useful.

That is why America is considered the Bastion of democracy. Many people have many opinions. However, this does not mean that after the victory Trump can do anything. Every step Trump and his team is now examined under a microscope. Paradoxically but in this situation he is less likely to make a mistake than Obama.

You have to understand that we live in the free world, democracy.
In the free world, all people are free to think what they want, and express their opinions freely.
You can't ban people because they don't think like you.
In our societies, we are free to think and act if we don't hurt others.
In the free elections, we freely choose our representatives and president.
We can say it's not perfect political system but still it's much better than political system in north Korea or Saudi Arabia, for example.
Think about it.

 

Responding to political dissent by deportations and state directed violence is very close to fascism, actually. Which is precisely what OP is proposing here. Otherwise, I agree with your post completely, sir. When I am unable to prove my point to the other party, it doesnt mean other party needs to be deported. It simply means that I am either wrong and/or terrible at argumenting.

It's certainly not fascism, but it is not democracy. Bans parties will not forbid people have an opinion. If people disagree with your statements then you do not know how to persuade or your opinion is wrong. Only in a dispute born truth.

Yeah, only difference between such SJWs and KKK is that they would cleanse according to nominal political orientation, not amount of melanin in skin. I wonder when did America went full retard and become a gulag?

And there are more questions. Would he cleanse only registered republicans or anybody with "conservative" leanings? What is "conservative", anyway? If one is registered democrat but considers heterosexual family to be building stone of society... will he get deported too?

How about black and/or muslim people, who are opposed against transgender lobby? Load them onto trains to camps too? Or will they get pass because minority status?

The more you start thinking about this, the more obvious it is, that these people are neither liberal, not democratic. In fact they passionately hate both.

I find it hilarious that you object against stereotyping people, yet that is precisely what you are doing here. Ie. anybody with "conservative" beliefs is evil, you are not even ashamed to lump them together with historical KKK organization.

And what do you propose to get rid of the boogieman? Basically, a genocide. Going house to house and cleansing country in fire.

I think, you should look into mirror very thoroughly. Social justice warriors seem to have uncanny habit of becoming the very thing they claim to fight against. Bigoted haters.

 The problem with those articles (the first one doesn't connect) is that they are opinion and not proof of anything - for the love of (my) god, dailyKos is a political blog and can't be put forth as proof of anything but perhaps your political leanings. Tell me, how is it okay to prohibit the use of coal in America (to in fact say, "Yeah you can have your coal plant but we will bankrupt you") where in fact, efforts were underway to produce clean emissions and employ the use of CO2 scrubbers and ship the production of your greedy desires over to China where they have little or no concerns at all for not only CO2 emissions but pollution in general?  You drive up the price of the things you need in USA for basic survival such as heat and electricity, remove employment from Americans who once produced things rather than simply consuming and you haven't done a damn thing to protect the environment.  It probably is in fact more detrimental to the earth to have allowed the production of every disposable item we use over to China.  It has certainly proven to be detrimental to them in every way other than monetarily but even that is dubious (we should have a discussion about wage slavery).

 Don't slot me into your preconceived notion of Christian beliefs.  I have neither the time nor the inclination to discuss abortion.

 Currently I own no guns but as I said, if there would be terrorists like you trying to run me out of my country for my beliefs or political leanings, perhaps I should obtain a few. Thanks for the warning about buying from a shop.

   

As far as I know there's roughly two groups of people in America, democrats and republicans. Someone who wants to ban one of those groups is likely to belong to the other group.  Why would want to ban a group that serves as your counterpart in political discussion? Is it because you can't get the other group to accept your points of view? Then you're no good at debating, or your arguments are to weak.

But simply banning because you disagree or because you think these people are bad for your health. That sir, is uncut fascism.

Removing American Citizens from America is not a good solution to the problem. The best way to solve the problems is to select good politicians that can amend laws that really protects life and environment. A good leader from the seat of the president up to the lowest ranked political leader in the society must be placed in order to realize that haven kind of society. If we can fulfill this, the  fake rights made from idiotic behaviors of people who want sex but does not want to get pregnant and killing the baby, fake rights made by the abnormal behavior of homosexuals such as LGBT will not be give consideration.

http://time.com/4657438/congressional-republicans-environmental-regulations-coal-streams/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/1/8/1268055/-Henry-Waxman-report-House-Republicans-voted-109-times-against-environmental-protection-in-2013
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/republicans-abortion-platform-225391

http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/19/news/guns-background-checks/


+ literally thousands of other articles proving what I'm saying.

Your christian beliefs are trying to be implemented into the laws of the U.S by right wing republicans. Your christian beliefs are against women having their own rights concerning their own body. Your beliefs on lack of gun control is why the U.S has so many mass shootings by people who buy guns without a license .

The only time people like you rally over this is when a loved one of yours is killed or something due to gun violence. Wonder why most of these shootings occur in states without much restrictions on firearms? Yea, you dumbass. In Alabama for example you can go buy a gun without a license, even if you're a criminal, a serial killer, rapist, etc, it doesn't matter because there is no background check.

I think there must be a worldwide (UN) ban on ideology, which promote the same time social conservatism and laissez-faire capitalism. It always lead to degradation!

 Freedom of speech is a requirement for a free society; it is therefore essential to allow dissent in order that we may hear all points of view.  Your idea of social control doesn't fit with the democratic principles of the USA.  You give no proof of your claims and you have used absolutely no logic in coming to your conclusion.  Feel free to put your thoughts on a placard and wave it in our faces so we can laugh at your reasoning.  This is why people need to own guns; to protect themselves from radicals like you who would try to run them out of their own country simply for their Christian beliefs.  <insert middle finger emoji here>

Alright, let's see. Conservatives tend to be

1) Religious/Christian and try and make laws that suit their (false and hypocritical) beliefs. Yea gay marriage shouldn't be allowed but divorcing is totally fine? A prime example of a hypocrite

2) Believe that global warming does not exist (Global warming does exist, not just by the hole in the ozone layer, but by obvious things, go take into account the millions of cars, airplanes, coal plants, etc releasing tons of abnormal and excess carbon dioxide, monoxide, etc and tell me that doesn't affect the environment. All that man-made technology has to have an affect on a planet which has never experienced any such thing before)

3) Are usually sexist and tend to not support women's rights such as the right to have an abortion(Abortion is NOT the killing of babies, abortion is basically the taking of stem cells before they form into an actual fetus. If you consider "cells" as being alive, then everyone on planet earth is a murderer because our skin sheds millions of cells everyday)

4) Tend to be more racist than any other political party as proven by the fact that most KKK members and other racial groups identify as conservative

5) Support having low to no restrictions on gun handling and buying. Let's take this into account, in order to drive a car you need a license and rigorous training of the laws of the road, as well as how to actually drive the car. Well, in some states you don't even need to have a gun license to buy a gun or even know how to shoot the gun in order to buy one. Does that make any damn sense when a average gun is far more dangerous and cheaper to buy than a car ? No, therefore I come to believe that anyone who supports the buying of guns without rigorous testing and at least having a license, is heavily retarded or wants to watch the world burn



The only logical conclusion is to get rid of conservatives from america. Like how trump is deporting illegal immigrants, well conservatives go against the constitution itself(such as trying to integrate religious belief with law, etc)