Pages:
Author

Topic: Continuum Mining Pool: No fees; Client uptime monitoring via twitter and email - page 14. (Read 50243 times)

sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
Apparently I inspired this image.
I have noticed this also

Could be in my head. For the record, here're my current stats:

Code:
Pool: 4065964415, Worker: 200434865 (4.92957745179873 %)
Balance: 1.69809988, Unconfirmed: 2.03382808121629
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
Apparently I inspired this image.
Hello, I joined your pool today and have not yet received payout even though I have accrued balance in excess of 3. Is the payout broken?

Yeah I think also my unconfirmed balance dropped?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Hello, I joined your pool today and have not yet received payout even though I have accrued balance in excess of 3. Is the payout broken?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Does twitter do anything besides down-miner notifications? To test should I just shut it off for the period (currently set to 10 by me)?
Yep, just shut your miner down and you should get an alert after 10 minutes of downtime. That's all Twitter alerts do for now but I am thinking of adding other things though it'll change the RPC API some.
Notify when the pool finds a block. That can be done with a regular tweet. Though might get spammy depending on the hashrate of the pool. For now though it makes sense.
Notification when client is paid.
So we'll see how that goes.
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
Apparently I inspired this image.
Does twitter do anything besides down-miner notifications? To test should I just shut it off for the period (currently set to 10 by me)?
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
Apparently I inspired this image.
I put my idle 5770 on there, let's see how it goes. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Yep, thank you.  I get the impression there's only about 3 or 4 miners here.  Anyone for a free pool?
www.continuumpool.com
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
And did you break the "last round" stat or me?  http://www.continuumpool.com/roundstart.php reports nothing for me.
Sorry, I broke it. Should be working now. Thanks for the heads up.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
You are, of course, correct on probability.  I look at it from the gambler's point of view, not the mathematician's.  Six days of nothing means good luck's comin'.  Is your server really in Canada?  I'd guess Texas.

And did you break the "last round" stat or me?  http://www.continuumpool.com/roundstart.php reports nothing for me.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
The hashrate calculation uses a 5 minute window so that's very strange indeed. I was doing some database work today so maybe that might explain it.
We actually found 3 blocks on 17-may.
It's worth noting that the probability of finding a new block doesn't increase with the round duration. It is the same for a 1 minute round as it is for a 4 day round.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
I see miner stats swinging from 440 to 930 Mhash; must be a very short duration (instantaneous?) calculation.   And with a current Overall hashrate of 3.X Ghash/s and no block since 5/17 ... we're likely to be solving one soon.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
with Eligius down, just moved my 700+ Mhash miner to Continuum.  Smooth sailing so far.  Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 575
Merit: 500
The North Remembers
Anyone want to setup a neat graph thingy like someone did for Eligius? I am lazy. Tongue
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
We are now hosted on a commercial softlayer server. Not that uptime has been a problem but now we can do fallback if we need to. New host is continuumpool.com for mining and rpc.continuumpool.com:8330/rpc for RPC interface.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
By "no fees", you mean a balancing negative fixed fee?
Correct, that was the only way I could see to implement this. So c = 0.001 and f = (-0.001/0.999) or -0.001...
Right. Be mindful of the effect these parameters have on the variance of yourself and the participants'.
Indeed. I'm still not commited to the current value of c but in my local testing it performed alright. It will be interesting to give it more wider testing.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Cool, a Canadian based pool Cheesy ! I definitely shall give your pool a try.
I would appreciate any feedback.
Quote
Do you pay out from generated blocks or directly like Luke's (Eligius) pool?
Up until last round, the payouts were from generated blocks IE 120 confirmations later. However, I think I have direct payment working. We'll see if it generates direct payments on the next block and go from there. But that is the direction in which I would like to go.

Quote
Seems like a clone of Luke's (Eligius) pool, but it doesn't really matter. The more pools the better.

Eligius is an Excellent pool. I wanted to do more with notifications of downed miners though. IE when a miner is down, I want an SMS etc. Luke definitely has the payment system right though.

Quote
Now for some quick questions. Are you running this off of a dedicated connection (data center) or a shaw cable connection Wink? Do you have a backup server or some sort of high availability setup?

I have two servers, though only one is currently running the pool. I will either do a failover DNS setup or possibly a round-robin approach to balance the load between the two servers. For now though, I am more focused on seeing whether the system will stand up to some load other than that which I impose myself. I imagine most folks have failover setups of their own. IE if a pool fails, fallback.

Quote
Also where do you guys get the pool software from? I too would like to setup a similar type of pool for me and a bunch of friends. Any chance of sharing the software?

I am using pushpool for the backend. It is written by someone else but is free software. You can search the forums. The database and RPC stuff is custom. Though I would be happy to share it, it probably wouldn't be very useful.
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
By "no fees", you mean a balancing negative fixed fee?
Correct, that was the only way I could see to implement this. So c = 0.001 and f = (-0.001/0.999) or -0.001...
Right. Be mindful of the effect these parameters have on the variance of yourself and the participants'.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I'm very excited to hear this! I'm switching my 2.2 GH/s from slush as soon as I have the time. I'll be happy to further advise you about the implementation details.

I would appreciate that. The implementation is pretty simple and is in a single PLPGSQL function I would be happy to post in your thread.

Quote
By "no fees", you mean a balancing negative fixed fee?
Correct, that was the only way I could see to implement this. So c = 0.001 and f = (-0.001/0.999) or -0.001...
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054
I am using the scoring algorithm described here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/geometric-method-new-cheat-proof-mining-pool-scoring-method-4787
It was designed to prevent pool-hopping attacks.
I'm very excited to hear this! I'm switching my 2.2 GH/s from slush as soon as I have the time. I'll be happy to further advise you about the implementation details.

By "no fees", you mean a balancing negative fixed fee?
Pages:
Jump to: