Topic: Contribute, or die. - page 3. (Read 2259 times)
Well, by now just about everything is a taxpayer-funded "right". I´m sure you have noticed that din. Total deadbeats must have their rights.
And how exactly would we determine who is "contributing"? 
What if... You put everyone into space launching programs. Some will build the rockets and the others get into them. That way you solve 2 thread problems at once.
What if... You put everyone into space launching programs. Some will build the rockets and the others get into them. That way you solve 2 thread problems at once.
I am probably going to get a lot of disgust for this. For that I do not care.
What is the point of forcing mentally ill, physically ill, or handicapped people to live? What is the point of that at all? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
What is the point of forcing mentally ill, physically ill, or handicapped people to live? What is the point of that at all? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
You're right. Those views are disgusting. But shared by many people unfortunately. Would you have killed the child Helen Keller because she was handicapped for example? Was she useless? She was a socialist so maybe many of you would say yes. Despite all her work. Mentally or physically ill people aren't useless. They are people. They have families. Many can be productive in the right conditions. And illness can happen to anyone. Rich or poor. But the poor don't have the money for those conditions. And what if instead of blaming the poor and homeless for using social services you blamed the rich for hoarding all the wealth they can get? And bribing politicians so they can evade more taxes and get richer at the expense of the rest. What was it? The top 20 wealthiest people in america have the same wealth as the bottom 50% of americans? And getting worse each year. And the tendency is the same in many countries. Do you think that creates conditions for a stable society? For people to have fair access to education and be productive in their lives?
If you don't contribute positively to society, you should die.
I am probably going to get a lot of disgust for this. For that I do not care.
What is the point of forcing mentally ill, physically ill, or handicapped people to live? What is the point of that at all? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
What is the point of forcing mentally ill, physically ill, or handicapped people to live? What is the point of that at all? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
You're right. Those views are disgusting. But shared by many people unfortunately. Would you have killed the child Helen Keller because she was handicapped for example? Was she useless? She was a socialist so maybe many of you would say yes. Despite all her work. Mentally or physically ill people aren't useless. They are people. They have families. Many can be productive in the right conditions. And illness can happen to anyone. Rich or poor. But the poor don't have the money for those conditions. And what if instead of blaming the poor and homeless for using social services you blamed the rich for hoarding all the wealth they can get? And bribing politicians so they can evade more taxes and get richer at the expense of the rest. What was it? The top 20 wealthiest people in america have the same wealth as the bottom 50% of americans? And getting worse each year. And the tendency is the same in many countries. Do you think that creates conditions for a stable society? For people to have fair access to education and be productive in their lives?
Dear Diary,
His threads have hit new, unspeakable lows; like the angry ramblings of a retarded monster. I find myself wondering: should I say something?
Also, Jimmy was so hot today. I totally want to do him.
His threads have hit new, unspeakable lows; like the angry ramblings of a retarded monster. I find myself wondering: should I say something?
Also, Jimmy was so hot today. I totally want to do him.
There is a common rule that 20% of people contributes 80% of all commonwealth. But if another 80% will be "killed" don't you think that you won't be in that "best" 20% ?
I am probably going to get a lot of disgust for this. For that I do not care.
What is the point of forcing people who don't work to live? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
What is the point of forcing people who don't work to live? Same goes for people that simply do not want to work but want to ride government issued services. We hard working taxpayers are forced to pay our money to the homeless that sit around wanting people to take care of them. Half of them use these services for drugs. They are dead weight and do not need to be alive. The same can be said for people who work but do not contribute anything useful or positive to society like Kim Kardashian. At least her husband runs many charitable organizations, won more than ten Grammy awards and has indeed proven himself to be a noble asset to society. I work. I contribute and I still struggle for my living while other people's livings are being handed to them. I don't know what Trump's demands are as president but if he wins, I hope he puts everyone that doesn't want to work and everyone that's not positive aid to society to sleep. They are useless to us. When people like Snooki are dead, we can rejoice.
Jump to: