Topic: Converting Bitcointalk to a decentralized Forum (Non-technical explanation) - page 2. (Read 466 times)

Then build it A quick Google search shows you're not the first.
But I already see a problem: I'd have to install software, which I don't often do (for security reasons). To take your Telegram example: I only use it in a VM. Bitcointalk (or any other forum for that matter) doesn't require me to install anything.

Some would say "build it first let's see".
My reply: how am I sure you will believe when it's built. You may consider it magic or voodoo because it is too advanced for you.

Thanks LoyceV

I can think of so many reasons why this won't work... Where to start:
Messaging clients nowadays use centralized servers, and users only download data that's relevant for them. Downloading all posts from a forum will easily fill tens of gigabytes, and it grows continuously.
Satoshi isn't around, so giving Satoshi access to any data won't work.
Gmail is a bad example: any POP3 email client used to have all emails available offline. But they all relied on a centralized server. By now, being online isn't a problem, but sharing your IP-address with all other forum users (just like when you use Torrents) is not a good practice.

---

---

Theymos has posted some good ideas about a decentralized forum. I remember the idea of ignoring users based on a system similar to the current Trust list. Without central moderation, everyone will have to choose for themselves who's ignore list to follow.

---

---

As much as I like the idea, there's a reason I haven't seen any real decentralized forum. The cons don't outweigh the pros.

I think part of the issues here is lack of understanding of my post and suggestions. I wish I could share this with optimists or people who would not believe my simple ideas are impossible to implement. I actually prefer to solve problems alone than involving people unless I could control what they say. It's hard to find people like me.
Incase you are not aware, I contributed to Gmail current method of categorizing received messages/mails, but when I initially contributed to the idea on Google Plus, I'm not sure anyone supported it until I saw it implemented later on Gmail. We are currently enjoying it.


Anyway, anyone can recommend to us how we can easily download our data from Bitcointalk. That is the major reason I want a decentralized forum - to be able to control my data or have copies of my posts/comments saved in my devices so that I can search through them whenever I want, even if the forum nolonger exist. I found an interesting tool yesterday called "DocFetcher". It's a bit like Google Search  for your local data. It should enable me search for posts/writeup I saved in my laptop. It would be nice using that for all of my valuable posts on the internet saved in my devices.
I want something that could serve me well whenever I start moving more often as a nomad, without the internet.

As far as I'm aware most websites which appear to be decentralised, are only somewhat decentralised. pseudo-decentralised might be the word for it. As in, they allow contributions from the community, and largely there's no central figure, but ultimately someone controls it, and if they wanted could indeed intervene even if it hasn't as of yet.

Although, I'm not even aware of many websites that are decentralised. One could argue that the projects on Github are, and therefore Github is, but that's not entirely accurate either. Although, I agree, and it might even change my mind if I could be shown some websites which have actually successfully implemented it. Although, from my thoughts on it, it either can't be entirely or it'll be detrimental rather than beneficial. 

@Ucy can you please give me a few examples of decentralized websites you know of or even use? Not necessarily offline ones, those are a bonus!

There's still archive sites that make periodic backups of public information from the forum, there's also some forum members that scrape and store parts of the website themselves.

I don't know if decentralised forums are yet a thing. Stacker news has been mentioned here before but they're a while from being decentralised and probably won't fully be unless they enforce their login via lightning network instead of allowing users to use other credentials like an email address.

It's possible to make the forum decentralised but we're also waiting on things to be done with the new forum software which Theymos seems against doing after it's been made (I'm fairly Indifferent to its use especially if it isn't cross compatible).

Exactly In the current span there is still lot of spam and daily hundred of reports are submitted so in the absence of it what would happen and would you call it a forum? It would be filled with spam posters if we think of going decentralised and it's not at all good idea with complete delegation of powers.

But yes we still enjoy the freedom of posting and share ideas with each other like the open discussion forum but why you want more freedom? As a member I feel free to write and see any board and mods are doing their job unless you make any mistake you don't need to worry but @OP idea doesn't seems to please me as well because we have seen that part which he is ignoring but see this is still freedom that you can share your opinions in the meta about what changes you want or forum related discussion but this doesn't imply all will get accepted.

Despite of the good suggestions about the forum upgrades. Let's don't forget that there is still epochtalk ^{(new forum software)} and its been how many years since it was started.
Now talking about a new forum software ^{(mentioned in this thread)}, i don't think another to be developed software and another set of budget will be considered.

Anywhere that a system doesn't take care of itself or doesn't need any intervention is where decentralisation makes somewhat sense, bar a few exceptions. A place like a forum which is subject to tens of thousands of spam posts every week, probably isn't the best place to have a popularity contest for moderators or ones that have simply been here the longest. That's not how you get a system that keeps itself in check.

Decentralisation is brilliant, but only when correctly implemented into something that actually works better decentralised. For a currency that makes absolutely perfect sense. Potentially for holding certain records via the blockchain, that aren't data sensitive it makes perfect sense, but a forum it doesn't, and the moderator selection issue is only part of the problem. Very likely, users would've stopped using the forum before this issue even became apparent.

So far the forums have been great and there's no need for changes that can look like wild social media.
This is indeed a Bitcoin forum and as we all know that Bitcoin is a decentralized currency, it is not necessary for this forum to be decentralized. It means I agree with you that not everything should be changed to decentralization.

The last change proposed by our friend @PowerGlove has been approved looks pretty good, namely the placement of (OP) in each username to indicate the person who created the topic.

So, what you're suggesting is some sort of end to end encryption sort of how Whatsapp does it? I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but how would that work on a public forum?

I personally don't get the obsession with changing everything to decentralisation, since it isn't something that needs to be implemented into everything, in fact I tend to believe in certain situations, decentralisation is a horrible idea.

Also, the forum doesn't need to be decentralised, and quite frankly at least from how I envision it would be absolutely horrible, and no one would use it. There's a reason why there's no true decentralised forum out there, since it would just become unusable, and way too much effort to implement in the first place without any real upsides to it.

You cannot be more wrong.
A forum that doesn't allow administration and censorship is the recipe for disaster. Although the forum, as it is now, allows freedom of speech, it still prohibits spam, plagiarism and spreading malware. Probably more too. And hundreds of posts (at least) are removed daily because of this.
On the other hand, a forum like you propose will be the ultimate garbage collector.

So my proposal is, like I tell those who want to create a better Bitcoin too: be my guest, make your own and see how many will embrace your idea. Then you will see if the idea was good or not.

Telegram that you used as an example is not decentralized, it is completely centralized. If this forum works like telegram, it does not mean it is still safe as long you have to still send posts online. PMs and anything you want to send on this forum with data, you have to go online. This forum do not nead any app for now, what matters most that members are demanding for is the new forum software, maybe it is going to come with apps or not.

I think Gmail business account should be able to do that, but you have to pay for it like subscription. You want people to also pay before they can be able to make use of the offline version? It is not an easy work, it will cost than you think.

I am perfectly fine with how this forum is.

I have been considering discussing this for a while now but didn't see any strong need for it. I think it needs to be considered now for several reasons. Some of which are, to make the forum hard to take down, to have post of members preserved even if the forum database is destroyed/corrupted from a single point etc. Incase of the latter, the forum copies can replicate and continue to exist possibly with another domain name (if necessary). The right domain name which should be accepted as the real forum domain name could be choosen via consensus involving most/all forum participants


So, I'm suggesting the development of a forum that works offline with members forum data saved in their devices, more like how Telegram or similar messagers do it. Such offline forum would enable members create posts, change forum settings and have them synced later with whoever is having the full forum data. Forum members can hold any amount of forum data the wish, whether it's the full/whole data or parts of it, such as their posts, threads they are posted in and their (members) forum settings. In regards to holding the full forum's data, I think it should be done in such a way that forum data that should not be seen or accessed by the holders is thoroughly encrypted, only the owners of the data can decrypt and access them. This would mean no one will be able to access or change Satoshi forum data (not even theymos or other high ranking admins) except Satoshi, who will be the only one with the decryption keys for his forum data... All other members including theymos will have their own decryption keys too.

The forum can exist in one or two forms/versions: the offline and online forms. I remember Gmail existing in similar manner (offline/online Gmail) with the offline one use for composing, sending email (and for other uses) offline, which later synced probably with the online version, with the latest state of the owner's account updated. For example, if an owner sends mail with the online version, the offline gmail will be updated to the latest "sent message" when the owner connects it to the internet... and vise-versa . Unfortunately, this Gmail method is still centralized, as users can only have copies of their own data rather than the whole Gmail data encrypted and saved in holders devices. With my method, any Bitcointalk members should be able to hold the full forum data in very secured manner.. It should be impossible for the holders to access people private data more like the Bitcoin system and Blockchain. This would also make forum moderation decentralized, open, community-based, transparent etc. With this method, members can rank up automatically to become moderators, moderators ranked up to become higher mods. Higher ranks will automatically get higher moderators access. And moderators should be ranked based on merit. I have developed and discussed a merit-based ranking system that's fraud-proof/fool-proof ... it can only rank up reputable moderators/members. Incase you are interested, let me know and I will share it here.

I guess the "Gmail offline" is available for both PC and Android devices assuming it's still in use. The forum offline version could exist in similar manner mostly for the sake of flexibility. You could either download the forum on your laptop/pc or on your android (or other mobile operating systems) devices.




You may move this post to the  right section if this is not the right place to post it.

---

Post Edit History:

Last edited:  10:38am GMT, Nov 7 2022
Post before the edit can be found here: https://archive.ph/sdklz