Topic: Copyright Registrations Do Not Recognize Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto - page 2. (Read 325 times)

The guy might be crazy but he isnt stupid, this was part of his strategy, i doubt he randomly decided to fill the papers now. Bitcoin sv was pumped to the moon so thats that.

With all the negative implications of the US Copyright Office's decision, it's actually a good thing for them to clear out all the doubts casted by those who feared CSW taking over anything with bitcoin's name on it. If anything, the Copyright Office gained a couple dollars from CSW by filing that paper and making himself look like a clown for the crypto community. What antics and facepalm moments would this guy serve next for our plates, I wonder.

Hey, finally some great news for today.
Yesterday's info was rather scary. I'm relieved that it was fake news. Stupid me, didn't double check, although since it was about CSW I should have triple-checked.


Edit: I'm curious if this John McAfee's Satoshi "info" was also based on this guy's attempt for copyrighting Bitcoin.

What Craig did was stupid. He wants to be regarded as satoshi in this way.
The entire crypto community knows that Satoshi deliberately disguises his identity and all agree to it, so that no one is looking for who the founder of bitcoin is to keep bitcoin neutral and cannot be controlled by anyone.

Sometimes it just makes me wonder why he is doing all of this . If you take a look at interviews he did , i would say there is something wrong with him . why he is trying to make people believe he is satoshi ? If he really is ( there is no chance he is ) he could prove it with few simple steps . Whats next Craig move ? Currently i see alot of news sites posting that probably Craig is Satoshi .

BSV pump was artificial? lol, that was so obvious that only newbies could bought at $120. Most of pump he bough his coins himself with not too many real buyers.

Not by him, he simply filled the papers, he knew all the idiots would say he is recognized as satoshi just because he was granted the copyright rights, which one can get about anything by paying a small fee.

In most probability, that is what happened here. Just filing the copyright claim for him means he is now the owner of the Bitcoin  WhitePaper and all the rights inherent with it. Wrong move. Craig Wright never amazes us all with all of his funny actions and even comments which the media loves to play with. He is a good joker, to say the least. I am sure that someone will contest this registration and a big and enjoyable war can ensue. The man is just downright crazy but then he is making money along the way especially with his BSV which pumped two days ago due to the copyright claim news.

So at the end of the day, we could be laughing at him while he is actually laughing to the Bank of Wright or Wrong!

So, the announcement that says U.S copyright office recognizes Craig Wright as satoshi is not really officially announced by, and it was just announced by Craig's spokesman? Unbelievable, Craig never stops to amuse me, he never stops to make an action that will make him as a clown in crypto community.  

Copyright registrations for the Bitcoin white paper and the bitcoin (BTC) source code by the United States Copyright Office do not mean that Australian computer scientist Craig Wright is recognized as Satoshi Nakamoto by the government, the Financial Times reported on May 22.

The development follows news that Wright filed copyright registrations for the Bitcoin white paper authored under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. A news release from May 21 claims that U.S. officials received confirmation that Wright is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, but the news has been met with skepticism from the crypto community.

A spokesman for Wright told the Financial Times that “the registrations issued by the U.S. Copyright Office recognize Wright as the author — under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto — of both the white paper and code,” claiming the Office to be the first government agency that recognizes Wright as the creator of the leading digital currency.

However, the claim has no basis in reality as when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, it does not investigate the truth of any statement made in that application, nor the identities of people registering for copyright. The Office told the Financial Times:


Moreover, the registering the source code does not protect the intellectual property of bitcoin as an invention.

The Copyright Office can cancel a registration application if it is certain that presented information is a false claim and the person claiming to be the author of a work is in actual fact not who they claim they are.

Recently, a scandal around bitcoin SV (BSV) — the altcoin backed by Wright —  placed Wright  at the center of international attention when cryptocurrency exchanges began delisting the coin amid Wright’s campaign to deanonymize one of his critics, so called Hodlonaut.

Hodlonaut targeted the Australian businessman with offensive tweets, calling him “a very sad and pathetic scammer. Clearly mentally ill,” and allegedly participated in creating the #CraigWrightIsAFraud hashtag.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/copyright-registrations-do-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi-nakamoto