core or xt ? | Bitcointalksearch.org

600watt

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 2106

Quote from: meono on August 21, 2015, 06:02:18 AM

Quote from: 600watt on August 20, 2015, 11:03:48 AM

since almost all the threads are discussing this question, which of the two options would you prefer ?

ok, this is not representative, but it may give us an idea where this forum is leaning to.

feel free to discuss, but please keep it friendly.

edit: not self moderated... Roll Eyes

OP, dont you think we have enough polls on these?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up-noonoopol-1091654

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up-68655

The above threads have the most number of votes. This section is pathetic to collect any meaningful poll

You should make a poll of "support BIP101 or no" Simple as that and the result would tell us more.

i agree. since the polls you are quoting were "hidden" in threads that were not titled with the poll question i overlooked them. in addition, i wanted to ask the speculation subforum, but the poll was moved as being off topic.

meono

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: 600watt on August 20, 2015, 11:03:48 AM

since almost all the threads are discussing this question, which of the two options would you prefer ?

ok, this is not representative, but it may give us an idea where this forum is leaning to.

feel free to discuss, but please keep it friendly.

edit: not self moderated... Roll Eyes

OP, dont you think we have enough polls on these?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up-noonoopol-1091654

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up-68655

The above threads have the most number of votes. This section is pathetic to collect any meaningful poll

You should make a poll of "support BIP101 or no" Simple as that and the result would tell us more.

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: vero on August 20, 2015, 05:27:34 PM

I support bitcoin core with bigger block size. bitcoin XT i will say no !!!!! go to hell XT!!

No problem. Implement BIP101 into core. It will be counted as well to the 75% needed.

roadbits

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Let the dust settle, emotions calm and then we go from there. basically everybody wants an increase. The question is "how much increase to start with, when to start, and how much to increase yearly".

Sumerian

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Bitcoin Core has already built its fundamentals. It's the start of it all and is the strongest survivor. I'd choose Bitcoin Core anyday

vero

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

I support bitcoin core with bigger block size. bitcoin XT i will say no !!!!! go to hell XT!!

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

Quote from: Zarathustra on August 20, 2015, 04:42:58 PM

Quote from: RaXmOuSe on August 20, 2015, 01:19:40 PM

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

Well, who is in charge of core?

Blockstream

This, pretty much. I don't understand how people can be comfortable that a private company is actually running the show.

Zarathustra

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1004

Quote from: RaXmOuSe on August 20, 2015, 01:19:40 PM

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

Well, who is in charge of core?

Blockstream

RaXmOuSe

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Quote from: hodedowe on August 20, 2015, 01:33:15 PM

Quote from: RaXmOuSe on August 20, 2015, 01:19:40 PM

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

Well, who is in charge of core?

No one, it's a dev collaboration just like the Bitcoin network. That's what some people don't like. They want someone in control...but with that you also get things like address and IP blacklisting. I don't know about you, but I don't want any one person in control of my bitcoins.

so, these are the devs on core https://bitcoin.org/en/development

From what I've heard, Wladimir J. van der Laan won't talk to XT devs.

foxbitcoin

sr. member

Activity: 593

Merit: 250

I'm a neutral observer, I don't care whether XT wins or Core "wins" because I think Bitcoin's evolution is going to be ultimately formed by its contact with fixed natural boundaries and self-limiting pressures, and will end up looking the same one way or the other.

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: RaXmOuSe on August 20, 2015, 01:19:40 PM

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

Well, who is in charge of core?

No one, it's a dev collaboration just like the Bitcoin network. That's what some people don't like. They want someone in control...but with that you also get things like address and IP blacklisting. I don't know about you, but I don't want any one person in control of my bitcoins.

aakashsangwan

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

PUGG.io

Quote from: unusualfacts30 on August 20, 2015, 01:19:28 PM

XT offcourse. Core is missing a leader lol

Hmmm as XT is having a leader and it opposes the idea behind decentralized Bitcoin, as if majority chooses Bitcoin XT then it will fall into hands of a few people and God knows what they will do to Bitcoin.

BTW for a soft fork to become a hard fork the 95%adaption was required previously and why this time only 75%is the minimum requirement for XT to become hard fork Huh

RaXmOuSe

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

Well, who is in charge of core?

unusualfacts30

hero member

Activity: 1540

Merit: 500

XT offcourse. Core is missing a leader lol

tadakaluri

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

I support only Bitcoin Core. If any changes or implementations needed, they must be done to Bitcoin Core only!

knight22

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

--------------->¿?

BIP101 or else. No matter if it is XT or Core. Let solve the scalability once and for all.

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: helmax on August 20, 2015, 12:33:44 PM

this FUCKING STUPID this war wht for choose

only you lost your money usd in bitcoin

if choose XT we have future for increase value BITCOIN

wht part this childs dont understand!

This is a false assumption fueled by panic.
You can't allow for more cheap transactions, blacklisting of addresses, and then say your currency is going to be of more value.

As for the 1mb limit, let the limit be touched more often than once in a blue moon and the limit will likely be raised in Core, just as other fixes have been implemented as they have popped up. Devs handle problems when they arrise, not when people get wormy.

Personally I think the whole "reindex for 3 days every time you lose power" problem is much more pressing than the 1mb limit.

dothebeats

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1352

Cashback 15%

I prefer core with bigger block size depending on the future adoption growth (2mb onward is enough for the next 3-5 years, I think). I want XT's concept, but I don't like how they introduce it to the masses.

doc12

legendary

Activity: 1284

Merit: 1042

Why not implement a dynamic block size like Monero for example, which is calculated from x previous blocks Huh

And a minimum fee to prevend spam attacks and dust transactions.

With adaptive blocksize we could always achive a high block fillrate and give an incentive to pay a transaction fee, if the adaptive timeframe would be 1 day for example (calculated form a moving average over the last 144 blocks). This would always make the blockchain space scarce for a given timeframe. If you want a fast transaction, you have to pay a higher fee.

IMO this is a very good soultion, to establish a fee system and allow more tps when the network grows with time.

What do you think ?

amaclin

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1019

There are at least two additional choices:
i) Both XT and Core in different datadirs
ii) I prefer fiat currency

Topic: core or xt ? (Read 1678 times)