That may be dinofelis but Monero would fall into the same category too.
Some people here say other newer coins (i won't name) are better for ANON tech.
There isn't, indeed, any good reason to "relaunch" monero, not more than there is a good reason to relaunch dash or there is a good reason to relaunch bitcoin.
These all have at least historical importance. If for one or another reason, one doesn't like the way their financial dynamics got started, there's no reason to "do it over", because there is, indeed, better tech around. That said, *at this moment* I still think that on the anonymous side, monero is one of the best. It has also fundamental problems which will bring it maybe to an end one day, but *today* I think it is still the best anon option.
I will tell you why: I only know of one better tech for anonymity, and that is ZKproofs, of the kind ZCASH implemented. But ZCASH made fundamental errors, and this is NOT because the boys that made it are idiots, but rather because the *implementation* of ZK proofs is, as of today, in fact way too heavy to be scalable to a sufficient extend. This is why they made the anonymous option on ZCASH and derivatives optional, because it is in fact not really usable if you need to process many of them on limited hardware. This will improve. But as of today, nobody knows how to make this slick.
Also, good crypto needs some time to mature before one can be reasonably sure that it doesn't contain gaping holes.
All this means that *at the moment* monero still has the best compromise between practical usability (and even on that side, the problems with GUI and light wallets are showing) and good anon tech.
Another issue is PoS. A premine/instamine is way way worse on a PoS system than on a PoW system, because with the former, the instamine gets amplified, while with the latter, it gets diluted. And tail emission makes every "wrong" initial distribution even out somewhat more.
This means that in the long run, a PoW coin with tail emission doesn't really care about any "initial unfairness", while a "sound money" coin with PoS can only get worse that way.
With DASH, this poses the extra problem of the potential collusion of masternodes. I have to say that I don't know how severe this problem is. But the day that Evan is made "an offer he can't refuse" to hand over all masternodes under his control, directly or indirectly, to TPTB, I don't know how much of DASH's anon remains.
But, as I said, DASH is what it is, and the people wanting to use it, can do so. Like bitcoin users use bitcoin. DASH *does* have some nice features over bitcoin (ALL altcoins have nice features over bitcoin, which is one of the worst coins out there).