Topic: Could Someone Re-Launch Dash - Fairly ? (Read 1748 times)

I think that relaunch Dash it's make everything worse. What's the difference between relaunch and hardfork?  ETH made a mess when they did the hardfork

You need to ask about SEC Safe Exchange Coin

I think we dont need to relaunch dash, so far dash have a good track

Wasn't my first priority, but you've prompted a rekindling of my interest in anonymity.

Frankly I have nothing but vaporware and a lot of work to do, so let's not talk about it. I will post about it when it is time to talk about it. You need to deal with what is real and mine isn't real.


I've found some flaws in your idea, and I replied on that thread.

Yes please

It just an idea, not sure its my pet idea, my main pet ideas are not crypto-currency related.

I will never develop it as I dont have the ability, i'm just kinda... throwing the idea out there.

I hope for the sake of your interesting though mysterious sounding project (and the future of humanity?) your health will improve and you will get your energy back.

Something I meant to ask, that is probably here somewhere, but that I never did, does this mysterious bitcoin killer of yours have privacy included as standard?

Yet you want me to analyze your pet idea.   (I'll take a look because you also helped me with your threads)

I am discussing very important matters today which pertain to choices about funding and feature sets. Doesn't mean I am going to continue posting. I have 20 more days remaining on an intensive 4-drug anti-Tuberculosis medication, thus I am not cognitive energy wise up to full coding speed so I can use this cognitive downtime for something important (also so I am not bored laying in bed like a zombie). My history is I have been chronically ill since 2012 (to some lesser degree since 2006 and worsening in 2010), but only found out in January 2017 that (one of?) my illness(es?) is disseminated, extrapulmonary Tuberculosis (also in my left lung). I had become progressively less productive and more lunatic in 2015 and 2016 as the illness was getting to the point where I was starting to dream of suicide for relief late last year (5 years of grinding misery wears down the will to live). Posting here is relatively easy compared to doing intensive technical work. (I have a slight brain fog right now due to the meds, which is making my thinking slow and noisy, but I can sort of wade through it). My energy level is rising the past several days, so I may be back to full speed soon (I hope).

P.S. the reason for the poor medical care and delayed diagnosis was a mix of things, but primarily being stuck in the Philippines, including mistakes of my part. I received some angel funding to travel to Singapore for medical tests in January.


Last night I really didn't like seeing my username on every thread at the top of the 1st page of forum. I felt I was being redundant.

But there are some things I want to discuss today. I want to discuss a bit about legalities and more about ideas about funding models.

Doesn't matter--a POS system that exacerbates its centralization with a instamine is a POS system that exacerbates its centralization with a instamine.

Or--just because another duck quacks, doesn't mean that we don't call the duck (we are currently looking at) a duck.

Or--Scam logic, "Other people are doing it, so why can't we/they?"

Pre-mine fiasco, lol? I find XEM has massive part of coins are belonging to the dev team, at least 20%, but no one blame them pre-mine, unfair and biased community?

Yes, but i'm different, I really am going to leave, just as soon as someone tells me why my idea here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/altcoin-concept-come-poke-holes-in-my-idea-1805042

Is no good. Or, if noone can tell me that, i'll have to stick around untill someone creates and launches it so I can go mine it

I mean I had "left" but then I was watching cryptocurrency youtube videos and though of that idea, then though about it overnight, then just had to come back and post a thread on it.

I am disappointed that such as active poster as yourself is yet to comment on it!!

I am also amused that you are "developing" a bitcoin killer while posting 600 posts a day on here lol.......

@AusKipper, everyone that says they are going to leave BCT, seems to always get drawn back. Click "Legendary" in my signature and see I am a habitual offender of "leaving". Lol.

Hey I wouldn't be shy about your thread, as I see some meaningful discussion. Also afaics, you are an impartial and fair poster so far. And also I think you have a good point that Dash's marketing is currently producing a good ROI in combination with the circumstance. For as long as those circumstances remain, it may continue to do well, although haven't both Dash and Monero had very large gains recently. That is why I suggested Bitcoin for the time being as it seems like it is just breaking out to ATHs and ready to rumble. But my speculation intuition could be wrong. Either or both of these altcoins could be poised to take more investment from Bitcoin as the Bitcoin scalepocalypse continues to play out. Smaller marketcaps have more upside potential, but also more downside volatility risk.

Hahaha yes, it is of course possible to do worse than bitcoin, and some idiots did so indeed

Thats a really good point Dinofelis, I didnt think of that aspect of the premine (being worse in POS than POW)

Maybe 10% into Dash was a mistake.

Still, I believe its the second most visible coin to joe blow, so..., I dont know, we will see I guess.

Thanks for your detailed reply.

I am not sure that we can say Bitcoin is the "worst" coin on the tech side, I see some altcoins about that I just think have to be doomed to fail (Sia that gives tokens to people who offer storage, and then give more out to people who mine? I dont see that working) but you probably know a lot more than me.

I would love it if you could come and reply to this thread that I created about an "imaginary" coin that uses a proof of storage system https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/altcoin-concept-come-poke-holes-in-my-idea-1805042

Everyone is ignoring that thread on me but I think its a really good concept.

This thread here can die now, i'm happy that re-launching Dash COULD be done, but if it was it would fail fast, even with a fair launch.

There isn't, indeed, any good reason to "relaunch" monero, not more than there is a good reason to relaunch dash or there is a good reason to relaunch bitcoin.

These all have at least historical importance.  If for one or another reason, one doesn't like the way their financial dynamics got started, there's no reason to "do it over", because there is, indeed, better tech around.  That said, *at this moment* I still think that on the anonymous side, monero is one of the best.  It has also fundamental problems which will bring it maybe to an end one day, but *today* I think it is still the best anon option.

I will tell you why: I only know of one better tech for anonymity, and that is ZKproofs, of the kind ZCASH implemented.  But ZCASH made fundamental errors, and this is NOT because the boys that made it are idiots, but rather because the *implementation* of ZK proofs is, as of today, in fact way too heavy to be scalable to a sufficient extend.  This is why they made the anonymous option on ZCASH and derivatives optional, because it is in fact not really usable if you need to process many of them on limited hardware.  This will improve.  But as of today, nobody knows how to make this slick.
Also, good crypto needs some time to mature before one can be reasonably sure that it doesn't contain gaping holes.

All this means that *at the moment* monero still has the best compromise between practical usability (and even on that side, the problems with GUI and light wallets are showing) and good anon tech.

Another issue is PoS.  A premine/instamine is way way worse on a PoS system than on a PoW system, because with the former, the instamine gets amplified, while with the latter, it gets diluted.  And tail emission makes every "wrong" initial distribution even out somewhat more.

This means that in the long run, a PoW coin with tail emission doesn't really care about any "initial unfairness", while a "sound money" coin with PoS can only get worse that way.

With DASH, this poses the extra problem of the potential collusion of masternodes.  I have to say that I don't know how severe this problem is.  But the day that Evan is made "an offer he can't refuse" to hand over all masternodes under his control, directly or indirectly, to TPTB, I don't know how much of DASH's anon remains.

But, as I said, DASH is what it is, and the people wanting to use it, can do so.  Like bitcoin users use bitcoin.  DASH *does* have some nice features over bitcoin (ALL altcoins have nice features over bitcoin, which is one of the worst coins out there).

No, I am new to crypto-currency.

This was my first thread here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-cryptocurrency-is-closest-to-my-ideal-monero-1796575

I think if you read that it would be somewhat obvious that I am no bag holder. In fact by the end of that thread I was telling iamnotback that Dash has advantages over Monero (marketing) that had caused the price to go higher (iamnotback thinks its because the founders are selling to each other).

Coming from the outside recently, I can tell you there is a LOT more publicity out there in the face of the "general public" for Dash (paid advertising) than there is for Monero (there is none for Monero that I saw).

This was supposed to be my last post in that thread:


So, as you can see, I DO like Monero more, but I do not discount Dash. Note that decision was made AFTER Dash overtook Monero on coinmarketcap.
 
IMHO Marketing counts for a lot in this world, and because of that I give Dash a much better chance than most of the "technical" people around here.

+1 @dinofelis. Again and again he is very good at distilling to the generative essence and articulating it.

That may be dinofelis but Monero would fall into the same category too.
Some people here say other newer coins (i won't name) are better for ANON tech.
BUT !
Their initial launch is far worse.. AKA: The infamous "Genius Tax"  

@dinofelis
You did a great job side stepping the trolling and posting the most pertinent info.
It's highly suspicious this was a Monero wacko trolling Dash with this topic and a puppet account.
But you simply avoided the issue LOL

Those two will be at it till the cows come home.. hahahha

I wouldn't see the purpose.  DASH (when it was still darkcoin) was important back then, because it was one of the first coins to see the fundamental problem of bitcoin which was its failed anonymity, the traceability of coins which propagates partial information on the block chain and kills off the pseudonymity mechanisms for anonymity.  People were setting up tumblers, but these were risky points of trust.  
Darkcoin implemented most probably the best way to tie these tumblers to correct functioning with a kind of smart contract: the masternodes.   The burden that came with that was a partial breaking of the trustlessness, a forced PoS system and the need for a complicated governance system (which has been turned in a lucrative business by the instamine, but here it is not clear what is cause and what is consequence).

So yes, Darkcoin was the best anonymous coin back then: it automated tumblers, and took most of their risk away with the master node smart contract system.

However, this was because Darkcoin simply used the known cryptography of bitcoin, and didn't implement more advanced cryptography that could provide anonymity automatically.  It is "bitcoin's pseudonymity with smart contract mixers", and the whole financial structure of Darkcoin/DASH is built around that needed smart contract for mixers.

Once cryptonote and zerocoin came out as cryptographic schemes, the need for this complicated smart contract system was done with. In other words, DASH has a large historic importance, but is using depreciated technology.  It is what it is, and it can continue living its life, but there's no point in doing this again, when better tech is now out and available, that doesn't need to build a "state and banking structure" with smart contracts in order to get these tumblers work correctly.

DASH went as far as one can go with bitcoin technology on the anonymous side.  But there's better tech known now.

And on the side of building "state and banking" structure with smart contracts, I think there are other "smart contract" type of coins like ethereum which allow you much easier to build even much more crazy things.  So on the "smart contract" side, DASH has nothing to offer that isn't implemented better elsewhere.

Again, DASH is what it is, like bitcoin is what it is.  Nobody in his right mind would want to "launch bitcoin again".  It is the oldest, most primitive crypto tech that is around !  Bitcoin is probably the worst coin on the tech side.  It is what it is.  But if you launch something new, better use more advanced tech.  Same holds for DASH.

ahhhh there it is  

Dash doesn't offer enough differentiation from Bitcoin ?  

You been here 2 weeks ?  

Premine  

Admit it your a pissed off bag holder that DASH blew past Monero http://coinmarketcap.com/

LOL, give me 7 million premined coins @ +20$ and I will seed 4400+ nodes.

DASH is premined.  Deal with it at your own risk.

It is an ICO.  For better or worst.