Pages:
Author

Topic: Could this be the reason why Satoshi never made himself known to the public? - page 2. (Read 293 times)

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
@CryptoHeadlineNews, didn't you understand anything from your previous thread when it comes to AI? You want to appear smart, but if you can't think for yourself, no AI chat will help you with that...
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 403
Compare rates on different exchanges & swap.
The so called Intelligent AI doesn't seem intelligent or truthful. Satoshi never claimed he's anonymous, so, the AI needs to quite trying to force the idea that he's anonymous into humans head. It's clear the inventor called himself Satoshi Nakamoto and claimed he's from Japan, so a truthful or professional AI or human should always assume Satoshi is right until proven otherwise. Calling him pseudonymous while he already told you his name is like saying he is lying. Besides, no one has been able to conclusively prove that Satoshi Nakamoto is not his name.
I know couple of legendary Bitcoiners who probably use their real names, yet they encourage anonymity and they made themselves public, why should Satoshi  case be different?

It's honest and professional to say Satoshi Nakamoto is probably his true name rather than denying it outrightly as if Satoshi told the lying AI they are his pseudonyms. It wrong to conclude without concrete proofs.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
Why did you ask AI?  Roll Eyes

I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.
Satoshi Nakamoto leaked his real name and address but deleted it shortly. We still don't know who is (are) Satoshi Nakamoto. It is all we can know.

1, 2, and 4 exist in the staff forum. 3 was permanently deleted at some point (it must have contained Satoshi's real name and address).
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
AI is not a truth finder

AI uses trends to use as answers. and so if there is a echo chamber of a fantasy AI will use it . thus continue the fantasy..

AI is only as good as the information that is available and all satoshi stories are based on random opinion of 99.99% of people that never interacted with him
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 577
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Op you have f you were a committed reader in the forum, you would have seen good answer that are even more than ChatGPT answers. ChatGPT answers are just like repetition of many threads and comments. Without even using ChatGPT I know some of the reasons why Satoshi Nakamoto is anonymity even in this forum. He is with us here because Satoshi Nakamoto can not just create bitcoin and also create a website for it and leave the both inventions and be on his own. That never done in anywhere, he has to be here to monitor the system how is goes. That is why the system is working fine.

So your thread is not a new thread in the forum, I have seen similar threads in forum time without number. Op I may also ask you a question, why are you anonymous here? Is that your real identity? I believe some these answers from you will also answer your op questions.
jr. member
Activity: 235
Merit: 5
Somehow no one considers the possibility that Satoshi could have just died, e.g. from a disease (let's say a coronavirus). So he might not have had time to reveal himself publicly, if he wanted to do so at all.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
ChatGPT, in my opinion, cannot know exactly where Satoshi Nakamoto has gone.  ChatGPT simply uses for its answers the information that was contained on the Internet on this issue until 2021. 

Satoshi Nakamoto was well aware that the most dangerous thing for his project is the human factor.  That is why he designed Bitcoin in such a way that it could function effectively without human intervention.  In some cryptocurrencies, certain issues are resolved by voting of the owners of coins or tokens.  There is nothing like this in the case of Bitcoin! 

I think that Satoshi Nakamoto initially decided that the first cryptocurrency should function without the participation of its creator.  Therefore, it is quite possible that he voluntarily stepped down from managing the Bitcoin project.  However, it is possible that he was killed.

Of course it can't, ChatGPT just compiles all the info from the internet, it can't think, guess or make conclusions. The reason why is he anonymous will forever be hidden, unless he reveals himself, I don't think that speculating about it is worth our time.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1775
Catalog Websites
ChatGPT, in my opinion, cannot know exactly where Satoshi Nakamoto has gone.  ChatGPT simply uses for its answers the information that was contained on the Internet on this issue until 2021. 

Satoshi Nakamoto was well aware that the most dangerous thing for his project is the human factor.  That is why he designed Bitcoin in such a way that it could function effectively without human intervention.  In some cryptocurrencies, certain issues are resolved by voting of the owners of coins or tokens.  There is nothing like this in the case of Bitcoin! 

I think that Satoshi Nakamoto initially decided that the first cryptocurrency should function without the participation of its creator.  Therefore, it is quite possible that he voluntarily stepped down from managing the Bitcoin project.  However, it is possible that he was killed.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 531
Chatgpt can't answer us, it's just a man-made tool, the answer we get is just someone else's synthesized by the chatbot, so there's no guarantee what it says is true. I agree with what rikafip said, why don't you give your own opinion about Satoshi? You have to rely on the chatbot's answer. It is not divine and may give the exact answer we are looking for. I know it's useful to many people, but we shouldn't overuse Chatgpt. I don't even want to use it.

I dare to disagree. It managed to answer the question very well and cover most angles. I'm satisfied with its answer while being a bitcoiner, so a person who is new to this should be too.

The main reasons that come to mind is:
He didn't want to be attacked by the government if bitcoin ever threatens its monetary policies. As the creator, he would be the weak point of the system, the way Vitalik is for ETH.
How many times these people, like Buterin, Hoskinson, Garlinghouse were targeted, commented on, sued even? The lack of founder that can become the target is one of the biggest strengths of bitcoin.

Another reason is that at some point he might want to retire and that would put unneeded pressure on bitcoin, the way Lee weakened LTC when he abandoned the project and sold his coins.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1288
It seems that you do not know how ChatGPT or artificial intelligence in general works. It is not a magic tool that you can find answers to all the questions that humans are unable to arrange. And if he gives you an answer, it is just speculation and not facts or words of importance or scientific support.

There is no point in such questions and there is no meaning in such answers, and they are nothing more than guesses.

the screenshot may give data about you, because it may show the type of phone you are using, and the time zone you are in.
with the data that you entered, it will be easy to identify you, so if you are concerned about your privacy, be more careful in the future
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 1089
Since Satoshi is the inventor of bitcoin then we cannot predict the be precise about his motive than the ones stated on bitcoin whitepaper,
The topic is not about Satoshi's motive, it is about his identity, and the whitepaper does not say anything about Satoshi's identity or why he didn't want to be known personally as the one who created BTC.

But it is not difficult to guess around 10 or more reasons why Satoshi never made himself known, and many people have talked about this reasons for years, and that's how ChatGPT came up with its answers, there is nothing unique about answers you get from a chatbot.
hero member
Activity: 1960
Merit: 537
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Chatgpt can't answer us, it's just a man-made tool, the answer we get is just someone else's synthesized by the chatbot, so there's no guarantee what it says is true. I agree with what rikafip said, why don't you give your own opinion about Satoshi? You have to rely on the chatbot's answer. It is not divine and may give the exact answer we are looking for. I know it's useful to many people, but we shouldn't overuse Chatgpt. I don't even want to use it.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
It looks like the OP is equating ChatGPT with some kind of super-smart that knows something no one else does. More proof of how AI is taking over the minds of people who rely on robots as their last resort
OP, ask where ChatGPT can get such answers. And in addition, ask how many bugs and incorrect answers this artificial creature gave.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 588
You own the pen

ChatGPT has only answered what everyone else is writing over and over again on the internet.
You can't say that there is anything new in his answer.

Everyone here knows the benefits of privacy, I tend to think that people who are interested in Bitcoin for reasons other than pure speculation don't need to think long and hard to come to the same thoughts as ChatGPT.

Its answers are what most people posted on the internet and I think ChatGPT just summarizes all the closes answers for the average people to understand. As for the privacy of Bitcoin's creator Satoshi Nakamoto, no one really knows about his reasons for not wanting any publicity even his own face. If people really admire his work, it's best for them to leave him alone and stop tracking the answers of how he doesn't appear in public despite all of the fame and merits he earned all around the world.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
Do we really need these kind of topics where people will dicuss what chatbot said about various topics?

Why don't you instead share yours own opinion about it rather than asking some chatbot what he has to say, like he can say anything other than what's been said many times before.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 416
stead.builders
Since Satoshi is the inventor of bitcoin then we cannot predict the be precise about his motive than the ones stated on bitcoin whitepaper, which i believe should be the ultimate guide we all should work upon, alot of people have been coming out to claim that bitcoin is this abd that, but we rarely believe on what they give because Satoshi real personality couldn't have gone that way far as the behaved.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 332
ChatGPT is not wrong. These are the reasons that people have always speculated about when it comes to Satoshi and I agree with them. There are also many other conspiracy theories as to the inventor of Bitcoin but these are the most logical. We know that logic does not answer all questions at every given point in time but I believe logic answers this particular question.
Bitcoin might have probably been easier to fight if the government can point to somebody as the creator or if the person or people that invented it were called "the owner(s)", then in that sense Bitcoin has lost its decentralized nature.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 1065
Crypto Swap Exchange
So was ChatGPT able to give any valid point? Or do you have anything contrary to say?

Please share your thoughts on this

ChatGPT has only answered what everyone else is writing over and over again on the internet.
You can't say that there is anything new in his answer.

Everyone here knows the benefits of privacy, I tend to think that people who are interested in Bitcoin for reasons other than pure speculation don't need to think long and hard to come to the same thoughts as ChatGPT.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 747
Today I just seem to be experimenting with the use of A.I, and a thought just came into my head that what if I ask ChatGPT what could possibly be the reason why the famous inventor of Bitcoin "Satoshi Nakamoto" never made himself known to the public and here is what ChatGPT has to say regarding this topic that has been a bone of contention on this forum for over a decade now.

So what have you to say about this, do you agree with ChatGPT or not?







So was ChatGPT able to give any valid point? Or do you have anything contrary to say?

Please share your thoughts on this

Pages:
Jump to: