Topic: Courier Network (For real) - page 2. (Read 11494 times)
No fuel, ok but what powers the electronics and servos?
What about this.
A robotic ocean-going sailboat.
No fuel required. No traffic/obstacles. You can start out pretty small. It would have instant value, as opposed to a more localized courier.
eg: http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/06/roboat-a-robotic-sailboat-powered-by-linux/
A robotic ocean-going sailboat.
No fuel required. No traffic/obstacles. You can start out pretty small. It would have instant value, as opposed to a more localized courier.
eg: http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/06/roboat-a-robotic-sailboat-powered-by-linux/
I've already done this with BitDropor Shady Delivery Network.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.92782
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.92782
I dunno... That seems to be going even more complicated. Cables (getting tangled in crap), a second recovery trip (more overhead), possible theft of expensive package containers...
exactly. Start small. We can think about all sorts of new technology in time...who knows, we might vast arrays of solar powered personal helicopter drones at some point in this crazy future....for now though, I say we reel it back in and try to come up with a solution using our primitive cryptography and blood/sweat
That's fine and dandy, but this thread is about a robotic courier network.
It seems to me that most people here in this thread are trying to model the robotic courier network (RCN? RoCoN? RoCoNe? RoCoNet?) after something that already exists - humans. So why not figure out how humans do it most efficiently and justly first?
Robot see, robot do. (So do it right the first time)
I'm going to start a new thread for those who want to explore the human courier network (HCN? HuCoN? HuCoNe? HuCoNet?).
Packages could have accelerometers, GPS, and cell phones. When it lands it can send its location via text to the recipient.
That is pretty expensive for a box. Would they be reused? If so, how?
Same as amateur high altitude balloonists. I have a Motorola 425i that I broke and installed some java that sends GPS (lat,lon,alt) to instamapper. That should get you close enough to see it or switch to other telemetry. Paid $35 for the phone $10 for the prepaid card.
o_o *looks around*
...
my mistake!
*backs out slowly*
...
my mistake!
*backs out slowly*
I dunno... That seems to be going even more complicated. Cables (getting tangled in crap), a second recovery trip (more overhead), possible theft of expensive package containers...
exactly. Start small. We can think about all sorts of new technology in time...who knows, we might vast arrays of solar powered personal helicopter drones at some point in this crazy future....for now though, I say we reel it back in and try to come up with a solution using our primitive cryptography and blood/sweat
Another drone could come and retrieve it. Perhaps using something like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system
Packages could have accelerometers, GPS, and cell phones. When it lands it can send its location via text to the recipient.
If you're going to go the airborne route - and I do think that's the most feasible currently for short-distance - then I think you'd be better off not landing at all. mount a smartphone with 3g connection on the drone, facing down. Set flight altitude to 50 metres or whatever is high enough to avoid any buildings in the flight path. When the drone reaches the dropoff point, check video from the phone to see that the area below is clear enough and drop down to 5 metres or so, maybe less. Then drop the package. Obviously you'll need a way to drop it, but that shouldn't be too difficult. Set the drone to automatically return after a few minutes of inactivity, in case something goes wrong - 3g fails, whatever.
Wouldn't shaded packages just attract attention though? As a result, contraband senders would just not label their packages as shaded. Why not make all packages shaded?
Personally, I love the idea of flying, autonomous delivery services as much as the next guy, but I think this conversation needs some re-alignment. The issue more presently at hand is that of a lack of decentralized distribution services. I had an idea for such a system.
BitDrop.
Bitdrop would be a system for human "runners" to pass goods from person to person in the most cryptographically secure way possible.
Person A negotiates a sale of an item to person B online.
Upon deciding on BitDrop as means of distribution, distance would be calculated and current gas prices would be tabulated. This is the base shipping cost.
Person A types in their "willing to travel" radius, and, the machine would chew on the data and randomly/securely spit back out an exact lat-lon point within that radius.
A nearby runner gets notified that a package is ready for distribution. He's signed up with his own "willing to travel" radius as well. Ideally, if there are enough warm bodies in the chain, the venn diagrams all start overlapping, and form a human supply chain.
Upon the completed transaction, all runners in the chain would receive good feedback (ideas for delivery confirmation? sms? scanned qr codes?), and get higher GPG rankings, which would enable them to deliver goods that had been marked with higher trust requirements...and likewise, the more you're trusted in in the chain, the more the runners can charge. Seller wants to sell something of importance/high value? they can raise the trust threshold (and subsequently, the shipping rate)
As far as black market goods go, I've thought of this scenario. The TOS for bitdrop would state specifically that transfer of illegal goods is strictly prohibited; however, you may anonymously mark your package "shaded" if you feel the contents pose risk for any member of the chain, including senders, receivers and most importantly, runners. Shaded goods may be distributed exclusively via dead drops, and runners can opt into notifications of shaded packages, but only after a GPG trust threshold is passed, so a significant time expenditure is required before you go "googling for drugs". You basically knowingly waive your rights when you deal with shaded transacations. That being said, I'm sure it would turn into a profitable venture for risk-takers, while keeping clean runners away from things that could land them in jail for trafficking.
There are other details I've thought of, including the distinction between dead drops and trusted drops. Dead drops would be entry-points into the runner market. Let's say I want to make some extra money, and I want to sign up as a runner. I go to the bitdrop site and sign up for an entry-level position. This requires that I pledge a deposit for the first item I'll deliver. This means that new runners will mainly focus on delivering items of little value. It's a Low-risk, low-return scenario for everybody involved with the transaction. Once I, the runner, complete my transaction, the deposit is returned to my account, as well as the base shipping cost + small delivery fee. Part of becoming a runner is setting up GPG-Authentication. The buyer and seller then add ratings to my transaction, and after a threshold is reached, I'm allowed to forego placing a deposit on items of certain values or lower. Eventually, dead drops would give way of chains with "trusted drops", where people who've established their trust arrange meetups based on encrypted lat-lon values and anonymous instructions. The specifics should be debated about at length to promote the safety and longevity of the chain
I don't expect my first ramblings to be the end-all-be-all of this system, but unless I'm way off base, I think the concept has potential. I actually wrote up an extensive post detailing this idea yesterday, and stupidly hit f5 before I sent it, erasing my whole post instantly... I'd love to hear feedback and concerns.
BitDrop.
Bitdrop would be a system for human "runners" to pass goods from person to person in the most cryptographically secure way possible.
Person A negotiates a sale of an item to person B online.
Upon deciding on BitDrop as means of distribution, distance would be calculated and current gas prices would be tabulated. This is the base shipping cost.
Person A types in their "willing to travel" radius, and, the machine would chew on the data and randomly/securely spit back out an exact lat-lon point within that radius.
A nearby runner gets notified that a package is ready for distribution. He's signed up with his own "willing to travel" radius as well. Ideally, if there are enough warm bodies in the chain, the venn diagrams all start overlapping, and form a human supply chain.
Upon the completed transaction, all runners in the chain would receive good feedback (ideas for delivery confirmation? sms? scanned qr codes?), and get higher GPG rankings, which would enable them to deliver goods that had been marked with higher trust requirements...and likewise, the more you're trusted in in the chain, the more the runners can charge. Seller wants to sell something of importance/high value? they can raise the trust threshold (and subsequently, the shipping rate)
As far as black market goods go, I've thought of this scenario. The TOS for bitdrop would state specifically that transfer of illegal goods is strictly prohibited; however, you may anonymously mark your package "shaded" if you feel the contents pose risk for any member of the chain, including senders, receivers and most importantly, runners. Shaded goods may be distributed exclusively via dead drops, and runners can opt into notifications of shaded packages, but only after a GPG trust threshold is passed, so a significant time expenditure is required before you go "googling for drugs". You basically knowingly waive your rights when you deal with shaded transacations. That being said, I'm sure it would turn into a profitable venture for risk-takers, while keeping clean runners away from things that could land them in jail for trafficking.
There are other details I've thought of, including the distinction between dead drops and trusted drops. Dead drops would be entry-points into the runner market. Let's say I want to make some extra money, and I want to sign up as a runner. I go to the bitdrop site and sign up for an entry-level position. This requires that I pledge a deposit for the first item I'll deliver. This means that new runners will mainly focus on delivering items of little value. It's a Low-risk, low-return scenario for everybody involved with the transaction. Once I, the runner, complete my transaction, the deposit is returned to my account, as well as the base shipping cost + small delivery fee. Part of becoming a runner is setting up GPG-Authentication. The buyer and seller then add ratings to my transaction, and after a threshold is reached, I'm allowed to forego placing a deposit on items of certain values or lower. Eventually, dead drops would give way of chains with "trusted drops", where people who've established their trust arrange meetups based on encrypted lat-lon values and anonymous instructions. The specifics should be debated about at length to promote the safety and longevity of the chain
I don't expect my first ramblings to be the end-all-be-all of this system, but unless I'm way off base, I think the concept has potential. I actually wrote up an extensive post detailing this idea yesterday, and stupidly hit f5 before I sent it, erasing my whole post instantly... I'd love to hear feedback and concerns.
I think it's a great idea, especially the shaded package concept, and is doable. As a delivery network it won't be fast but I couldn't imagine it being more expensive than say USPO for national delivery.
What we need is a strong leader to make the courier network run on time.
Who else but Megatron?
What we need is a strong leader to make the courier network run on time.
when you say reliability, are you talking about timeliness specifically? If so, perhaps the runner can designate a delivery schedule (available weekends, tuesdays after 8pm) kinda thing so everybody knows what sort of time-frame all the links in the chain are running on. If the package needs to be delivered to the next runner or the destination before this runner can deliver it based on their schedule, they're opted out of the "delivery available" message all together.
Likewise, if they agree to run a package and are late circumstantially, a negative mark should be considered. If a theft occurs by a runner, the account will essentially self-destruct, and their deposit (if applicable) should be either given to seller, buyer, or donated to a fund to be voted on by the two. At this point, criminal proceedings may occur.
I guess it's a semantic thing. Labeling people as untrustworthy when that isn't really the case doesn't sit well with me.Likewise, if they agree to run a package and are late circumstantially, a negative mark should be considered. If a theft occurs by a runner, the account will essentially self-destruct, and their deposit (if applicable) should be either given to seller, buyer, or donated to a fund to be voted on by the two. At this point, criminal proceedings may occur.
Yeah, but how would you do that with robots?
The same way, except the runners would be robots managed by an operator. 
when you say reliability, are you talking about timeliness specifically? If so, perhaps the runner can designate a delivery schedule (available weekends, tuesdays after 8pm) kinda thing so everybody knows what sort of time-frame all the links in the chain are running on. If the package needs to be delivered to the next runner or the destination before this runner can deliver it based on their schedule, they're opted out of the "delivery available" message all together.
Likewise, if they agree to run a package and are late circumstantially, a negative mark should be considered. If a theft occurs by a runner, the account will essentially self-destruct, and their deposit (if applicable) should be either given to seller, buyer, or donated to a fund to be voted on by the two. At this point, criminal proceedings may occur.
Likewise, if they agree to run a package and are late circumstantially, a negative mark should be considered. If a theft occurs by a runner, the account will essentially self-destruct, and their deposit (if applicable) should be either given to seller, buyer, or donated to a fund to be voted on by the two. At this point, criminal proceedings may occur.
Also, in addition to tracking trust, I think the system should also track reliability separately. A perfectly trustworthy person might be late for reasons beyond his control.
sure! They could be easily integrated into the system 
Drone operators could participate in BitDrop too, no?
Jump to: