Oh, is that what it shows? . How did you get so good at reading charts?
I didn't expect you to grasp that point I was making. No hard feelings.Obviously there is a bulge of deaths right after the injection and it decays.
Except there isn't. You cannot possibly state there is a "bulge of deaths after the injection" when the graph does not show any data whatsoever prior to the injection. That's the whole point. As with everything anti-vaxxers do, you are taking incomplete or deliberately misleading data and then making a massive leap of faith to completely incorrect conclusions. I was simply pointing out that I can do that do to make the data "prove" the complete opposite of what you have wrongly assumed.You are the only 'doctor' I know of who is arguing that the Pfizer and Moderna goodness are such a powerful elixer of life and health that they drop the background death rate from 2000 down to 50 or whatever. That really is 'pushing the bounds of science' as it were.
Ergo no spike in injury after the injection go into the body...never mind the people being wheeled out of the mass injection events on gurneys with 'medical staff' feverishly pumping on their chests. I mean we've all seen the vids but but only a fraction of peeps can write it off to 'coincidence'. That ability is one of the 'super-powers' of the vax cult so it seems.
---
And again, so we don't lose track of the big picture here, if one takes a pencil and circles all of the deaths up to around day 45, note that these people are NOT 'vaxxed'. Thus, they are 'unvaxxed' and that's the number they pump out in the mainstream media often enough as evidence of 'vaccine safety and efficacy'. That was the same trick they used in the 'warp-speed trials' as well.
