I've removed it now because I think it's justifiable considering this user is no longer using signature and avatar from scam campaign.
A nice decision from you, he is lucky to have a second chance and I trust he would be a good forum member from henceforth.
But I really regret his act of deliberately applying and not doing research on the campaign he will promote, his regret really doesn't make sense even though in the end I've removed the tag.
Him claiming not to be aware that 1xbit is a scam company is the more reason I believe he's sincere in his claims. If an active forum member buys an account, atleast he should be aware of the deadened reputation of 1xbit in this forum. For not making research, I know the feeling when one is looking for some pay with red eyes, especially when the next day meal is not guaranteed.
I don't expect some other people after this to complain about the same reason, they should legitimately get negative tag even if accepted or not in campaign because basically they consciously want to earn few dollar by submitting application on campaign.
Well, I could differ here. I would only tag someone who wears the signature and avatar of a scam company and who is accepted in the campaign.
When I checked your sent feedbacks, about the users promoting 1xbit, your statement wasn't consistent. For some you said 'Promoting or promoted 1xbit " while some you said "Trying to promote 1xbit ".
I would suggest you go back to those feedbacks, confirm if those trying to promote are promoting it already, the you change the feedback to "Promoting 1xbit"
